Point system adjustment.

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
Txflier
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 5:38 pm
Gender: Male
Location: usa

Point system adjustment.

Post by Txflier »

[Delete Me]
PLACE THE NAME OF THE SUGGESTION IN THE SUBJECT LINE!

Things to remember when posting a new suggestion are that the dice are random, and that lots of analysis has been done on them both internally and public by community members. Also, please take time to search for previous similar suggestions and, if possible, to check current and archived threads before posting something "new". Delete the xxxxxxx, and substitute your text.

Any questions, contact one of the Suggestions Moderators.
[/Delete Me]


Concise description:
  • Not sure about a concise fix. but it would be nice for higher ranks to have motivation to play lower ranks. It would help promote game play on the site.
Specifics/Details:
  • Some way to even out points in games. Why would anyone want to play a cook and get 1 point when you could lose 70 points. It would be nice to have a way for higher ranks want to play lower ranks.
How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:
  • It would help by getting more of the higher ranks into games with lower ranks, and hence get more players playing each other and interested in the site. I'm all for playing newbs, but not if I'll drop a rank if I happen to get a bad drop and horrible dice.
User avatar
TheForgivenOne
Posts: 5998
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME

Re: Point system adjustment.

Post by TheForgivenOne »

And how do you suggest we do this? Giving away an even 20 points won't work, as players will rocket up the scoreboard if they farm a map against low ranks who don't know what they are doing.
Image
Game 1675072
2018-08-09 16:02:06 - Mageplunka69: its jamaica map and TFO that keep me on this site
User avatar
TheMissionary
Posts: 1724
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:02 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Wyoming

Re: Point system adjustment.

Post by TheMissionary »

I agree with the current points system. Making higher ranks less vulnerable to point loss would defeat the purpose.
Image
chapcrap
Posts: 9686
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Gender: Male
Location: Kansas City

Re: Point system adjustment.

Post by chapcrap »

I also like the current point system.

Also, want to point out the fact that you can never lose 70 points in a game. You probably know that, but want to state it.
User avatar
greenoaks
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Re: Point system adjustment.

Post by greenoaks »

have i understood your suggestion right?

after benefiting from being a low rank playing higher ranks for lots of points and successfully achieving a high rank you want the system changed so the current crop of low ranks can't do to you what you did to those before you.
User avatar
Metsfanmax
Posts: 6619
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Point system adjustment.

Post by Metsfanmax »

chapcrap wrote:I also like the current point system.

Also, want to point out the fact that you can never lose 70 points in a game. You probably know that, but want to state it.
Sure you can. The maximum you can lose is 100 points in a game, which will happen whenever your opponent's score is less than 1/5 of yours. So a brigadier (say) playing a cook will always lose more than 70 points if he loses the game.
chapcrap
Posts: 9686
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:46 am
Gender: Male
Location: Kansas City

Re: Point system adjustment.

Post by chapcrap »

Metsfanmax wrote:
chapcrap wrote:I also like the current point system.

Also, want to point out the fact that you can never lose 70 points in a game. You probably know that, but want to state it.
Sure you can. The maximum you can lose is 100 points in a game, which will happen whenever your opponent's score is less than 1/5 of yours. So a brigadier (say) playing a cook will always lose more than 70 points if he loses the game.
Ok, i'm an idiot. In my head I was thinking that the max you could lose was 50, but I know that's not true. I can recall a specific game right now where I lost 59.

Mets is right, sorry for being retarded.
User avatar
greenoaks
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Re: Point system adjustment.

Post by greenoaks »

chapcrap wrote:sorry for being retarded.
we're sorry for you too.
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”