boberz wrote:i believe the opacity of the lines could be looked at (since the major upheavel in the boundries has changed the dynamics of this) whilst i myself do not see it as an issue i understand how it could be for some people and think 5 minutes work is worth this, and the sea names as you mentioned.
AS you have pointed out this is very little work all the more reason to make the few changes there are.
Personally i still wish the bonusses and the title to be changfed but understand why they are not so am not complaining
Like I said, before I thought the borders were fine when they looked "jagged", but you know you make some allowances for people who really care about this sort of thing. But since then they have been changed, and I still think they're fine.
A map should only be held up for so long over an issue which is only a problem for a very small number of people. Besides, the idea of less than opaque borders seems like a bad one to me. I like dark lines.
Having read back over the bonuses, the logic marv seems to have used is that one of the continents has more territories in it and hence a bigger bonus. Also the title thing has been justified several times.