danryan wrote:joe snuffy wrote:Look deep at the starfish. When it winks, they will know defeat.
You know the stunner is coming.
The shocker for you, my friend!
Moderator: Clan Directors
danryan wrote:joe snuffy wrote:Look deep at the starfish. When it winks, they will know defeat.
You know the stunner is coming.
eggrollonedolla wrote:Ill kiss it.
I'MA MAN, BABY!!!!!
Gunn217 wrote:eggrollonedolla wrote:Ill kiss it.
I'MA MAN, BABY!!!!!
Dude! You just got married!?! Why are you talking about kissing starfishes?
danryan wrote:Gunn217 wrote:eggrollonedolla wrote:Ill kiss it.
I'MA MAN, BABY!!!!!
Dude! You just got married!?! Why are you talking about kissing starfishes?
He just got married. No more sex. Quod Erat Demonstratum.
eggrollonedolla wrote:danryan wrote:Gunn217 wrote:eggrollonedolla wrote:Ill kiss it.
I'MA MAN, BABY!!!!!
Dude! You just got married!?! Why are you talking about kissing starfishes?
He just got married. No more sex. Quod Erat Demonstratum.
TheMissionary wrote:What's the story with GG/AOD? We are ready to get started over here at the airport.
Gunn217 wrote:Please don't get negative in the main thread. If you want to continue to bitch, do it in PM or in the GG/AOD thread. You've done a fine job, DJ.
you sure ? you keep changing your mind if you want quotes from where you said they did i will ok here you goDJ Teflon wrote:On inspection, they hadn't violated in any games they won, although it didn't help I took AOD on their word initially when they started complaining.
GG have violated the rule (where applicable to the map) 7 times in team games:
Game 9718975 AOD Won anyway
Game 9734213 GG close to winning
Game 9703281 - AOD Won anyway
Game 9703284 - GG won
Game 9703286 - GG won
Game 9703288 - AOD Won anyway
Game 9703292 - AOD Won anyway
This effectively means GG lose 4 points, and thereby hands the tie to GG - a sad end but rules are rules.
CORRECTION :
The FOW Rule breach is only relevent in this game:
Game 9703284
kennys777 wrote:Gunn217 wrote:Please don't get negative in the main thread. If you want to continue to bitch, do it in PM or in the GG/AOD thread. You've done a fine job, DJ.
Isn't "if you want to continue to bitch" a negative comment in itself? Save your rhetoric for someone else, I believe I am afforded the right to speak about how this tournament was run.
DJ Teflon wrote:Never mind, at least the South Park Kenny kept his mouth shut
Seriously though, AOD are annoyed as GG were messy with the FOW courtesy. On inspection, they hadn't violated in any games they won, although it didn't help I took AOD on their word initially when they started complaining.
To complicate things AOD want an alternative to the CLA FOW rule to apply.
There is also debate about a remade game. A deadbeat situation led to this. MOWs suggested a remake, voiding the original game. AOD want to undo this, claiming duress.
A further complaint relates to minimal consequences imposed when GG were late creating and joining games. This has occured in many ties and leeway was given.
Going into round 3, FOW will be clarified, no action taken on deadbeating (unless there is evidence its deliberate), consequences of lateness imposed strictly, and complaints must be made when violations occur (and not as ties reach a conclusion).
stahrgazer wrote:Remaking a game when another team deadbeated, and no action taken? Seems wrong, especially since that's the only real 'CC rule': no deadbeating is a rule here, while the other things are gentlemen's agreements only.
stahrgazer wrote:But overall, if a team is consistently violating the little things, those little things add up into something bigger ... Yeah, little things rub, and when repeated, it's like continually rubbing at a scab: eventually it gets more sore, more raw, and more bloody, even if "rubbing" itself doesn't make wounds.
Sorry you had an un-enjoyable time, AoD.
stahrgazer wrote:DJ Teflon wrote:Never mind, at least the South Park Kenny kept his mouth shut
Seriously though, AOD are annoyed as GG were messy with the FOW courtesy. On inspection, they hadn't violated in any games they won, although it didn't help I took AOD on their word initially when they started complaining.
To complicate things AOD want an alternative to the CLA FOW rule to apply.
There is also debate about a remade game. A deadbeat situation led to this. MOWs suggested a remake, voiding the original game. AOD want to undo this, claiming duress.
A further complaint relates to minimal consequences imposed when GG were late creating and joining games. This has occured in many ties and leeway was given.
Going into round 3, FOW will be clarified, no action taken on deadbeating (unless there is evidence its deliberate), consequences of lateness imposed strictly, and complaints must be made when violations occur (and not as ties reach a conclusion).
Interesting.
If there was some abuse of whatever 'gentleman's agreement' was made, I can see where AoD wouldn't be too thrilled.
Remaking a game when another team deadbeated, and no action taken? Seems wrong, especially since that's the only real 'CC rule': no deadbeating is a rule here, while the other things are gentlemen's agreements only.
Lateness can be aggravating, but it happens, so again, imposing consequences for that, "strictly," where deadbeating gets no action? Interesting. It does, however, make sense that complaints should be made immediately, not just if a game is going against the group that wasn't late.
But overall, if a team is consistently violating the little things, those little things add up into something bigger, so AoD's disgruntlement should be understandable; and since whatever venting took place here didn't violate any forum rules, what's the problem with them venting? Some of you may remember a similar series of miniscule infractions LoW witnessed in another series, that finally added up into something greater than the tiny parts. Little action was taken then, either, the reason given: no punishments for those infractions were stated up-front. But the other team WAS severely warned to stick to their agreements, which was something.
Yeah, little things rub, and when repeated, it's like continually rubbing at a scab: eventually it gets more sore, more raw, and more bloody, even if "rubbing" itself doesn't make wounds.
Sorry you had an un-enjoyable time, AoD.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users