i said "give what you can take only what you need" sure i dont need my computer in the sense you are refering to but is that any reasons to throw it out? you obviously misinterpreted the message. there are lots of things that people do not need thats no reason to not have them is it?DIRESTRAITS wrote:I know. He has no idea what my point was though. Anarchy keeps saying people should only keep what they need, but he doesn't need a computer, so he is in violation of his own doctrineeverywhere116 wrote:Sputnik was the first Soviet sattelite.DIRESTRAITS wrote:What?spurgistan wrote:I'm still not liking this whole "taking the USSR to represent Marxism thing... WHICH IT DIDN'T AND NEVER DID!" thing, but... ya heard of Sputnik? Crazy commies figured out a computer or two.DIRESTRAITS wrote:So Anarchist, do you really need the computer your sitting at?
Marxists Thread
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- Anarchy Ninja
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:12 am
- Location: Back

-
foolish_yeti
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:09 pm
- Location: nowhere
- Anarchy Ninja
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:12 am
- Location: Back
-
spurgistan
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm
If by that you mean the exact opposite, than you're right, as Sputnik, the world's first man-made satellite, forced the West to consider how an "inferior" economic system had bested them, and forced them to redouble their space program to prove to the world that capitalism was better. So, pressure from the Soviet sphere forced the ... ahem... [stifled giggle]... "democracies" [bursts into laughter] to reconsider their system.ksslemp wrote:Do you believe they would have developed these things without the pressure brought on them from the worlds democracies?spurgistan wrote:I'm still not liking this whole "taking the USSR to represent Marxism thing... WHICH IT DIDN'T AND NEVER DID!" thing, but... ya heard of Sputnik? Crazy commies figured out a computer or two.DIRESTRAITS wrote:So Anarchist, do you really need the computer your sitting at?
- everywhere116
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:37 am
- Location: Somewhere on this big blue marble.
And I congratulate you. But, what's this? Applying yourself? Getting an education? Things that we are telling you and everyone you represent to do?foolish_yeti wrote:Actually I'm less than three weeks away from completing my second degree with no debt- nice try, thougheverywhere116 wrote: It takes hard work and having to apply yourself, something it seems you are unwilling to do.
"Disease, suffering, hardship...that is what war is all about."-Captain Kirk, from "A Taste of Armageddon"
- ksslemp
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Slemp, KY 41763 Pop. 'nough
- Contact:
Anarchy Ninja wrote:if it where at all viable i would propose setting up 2 independent cities
1 can live in communist utopia, the other can live in a capitilist society
i personally believe that if the capitilist society would either destroy them selves in a revoloution or after using all their resource attempt to kill the communists
Please put the capitalist city close the communist one, I'd hate to have the communists have to travel too far for spare parts.
No Offense meant!
-
foolish_yeti
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:09 pm
- Location: nowhere
Not sure what risk has to do with this. At birth what made you more deserving of your privileges than the next baby? Do I think everyone should have an opportunity for success? Yes.DIRESTRAITS wrote:so we should equalize everything? Using your logic, a game of risk should start with everyone moving simultanueosly and everyone owning the same territories on a symmetrical board
- everywhere116
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:37 am
- Location: Somewhere on this big blue marble.
Then define communism and what the USSR was.Anarchy Ninja wrote:how many people have already told you that was NOT COMMUNISMeverywhere116 wrote:I believe that the communists will be sick of living in communism and move to the capitalistic city. This has been done before. See: Berlin, 1946-1989.
"Disease, suffering, hardship...that is what war is all about."-Captain Kirk, from "A Taste of Armageddon"
- DIRESTRAITS
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 6:27 pm
- Location: Smacking everyone who says Oreeegone
-
foolish_yeti
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:09 pm
- Location: nowhere
Not sure who I represent to you...everywhere116 wrote:And I congratulate you. But, what's this? Applying yourself? Getting an education? Things that we are telling you and everyone you represent to do?
But I am privileged. I recognize that I have had much more help in succeeding than many students can ever hope to get.
- Anarchy Ninja
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:12 am
- Location: Back
the capitalist city would be welcom to come as close as they wish, they might learn how to run an utopian societyksslemp wrote:Anarchy Ninja wrote:if it where at all viable i would propose setting up 2 independent cities
1 can live in communist utopia, the other can live in a capitilist society
i personally believe that if the capitilist society would either destroy them selves in a revoloution or after using all their resource attempt to kill the communists
Please put the capitalist city close the communist one, I'd hate to have the communists have to travel too far for spare parts.
No Offense meant!

- Anarchy Ninja
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:12 am
- Location: Back
its kind of in the name you know, united soviet SOCIALIST republiceverywhere116 wrote:Then define communism and what the USSR was.Anarchy Ninja wrote:how many people have already told you that was NOT COMMUNISMeverywhere116 wrote:I believe that the communists will be sick of living in communism and move to the capitalistic city. This has been done before. See: Berlin, 1946-1989.

- ksslemp
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Slemp, KY 41763 Pop. 'nough
- Contact:
If indeed you believe this, I feel sorry for you.spurgistan wrote:If by that you mean the exact opposite, than you're right, as Sputnik, the world's first man-made satellite, forced the West to consider how an "inferior" economic system had bested them, and forced them to redouble their space program to prove to the world that capitalism was better. So, pressure from the Soviet sphere forced the ... ahem... [stifled giggle]... "democracies" [bursts into laughter] to reconsider their system.ksslemp wrote:Do you believe they would have developed these things without the pressure brought on them from the worlds democracies?spurgistan wrote:I'm still not liking this whole "taking the USSR to represent Marxism thing... WHICH IT DIDN'T AND NEVER DID!" thing, but... ya heard of Sputnik? Crazy commies figured out a computer or two.DIRESTRAITS wrote:So Anarchist, do you really need the computer your sitting at?
Don't fear Truth, Embrace it!
Sputnik was a paper tiger.
- everywhere116
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:37 am
- Location: Somewhere on this big blue marble.
To me you represent the liberals and their stance you are taking.foolish_yeti wrote:Not sure who I represent to you...everywhere116 wrote:And I congratulate you. But, what's this? Applying yourself? Getting an education? Things that we are telling you and everyone you represent to do?
But I am privileged. I recognize that I have had much more help in succeeding than many students can ever hope to get.
But I thought school was free, and, in fact, forced? How can you deny they cannot get an education?
"Disease, suffering, hardship...that is what war is all about."-Captain Kirk, from "A Taste of Armageddon"
- everywhere116
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:37 am
- Location: Somewhere on this big blue marble.
Thats not defining it. I mean, how did thier systems differ?Anarchy Ninja wrote:its kind of in the name you know, united soviet SOCIALIST republiceverywhere116 wrote:Then define communism and what the USSR was.Anarchy Ninja wrote:how many people have already told you that was NOT COMMUNISMeverywhere116 wrote:I believe that the communists will be sick of living in communism and move to the capitalistic city. This has been done before. See: Berlin, 1946-1989.
"Disease, suffering, hardship...that is what war is all about."-Captain Kirk, from "A Taste of Armageddon"
- DIRESTRAITS
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 6:27 pm
- Location: Smacking everyone who says Oreeegone
okay, I lied. This is my last post for real. Yes, Everyone should have a chance at success, which they do in capitalism. But if you even everything out from the start, when the two babies grow up, they will be forced to live under the same conditions as each other, even if one person is more talented that the other. This creates a society completely made up of lower middle class people. By giving everybody an equal chance to succeed, you are giving no one a chance.foolish_yeti wrote:Not sure what risk has to do with this. At birth what made you more deserving of your privileges than the next baby? Do I think everyone should have an opportunity for success? Yes.DIRESTRAITS wrote:so we should equalize everything? Using your logic, a game of risk should start with everyone moving simultanueosly and everyone owning the same territories on a symmetrical board
-
spurgistan
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm
Man, I am b.o.r.e.d.everywhere116 wrote:Then define communism and what the USSR was.Anarchy Ninja wrote:how many people have already told you that was NOT COMMUNISMeverywhere116 wrote:I believe that the communists will be sick of living in communism and move to the capitalistic city. This has been done before. See: Berlin, 1946-1989.
Anyways, the differences between Russian-style communism (boo!) and Marxism (yay!) are far too many for me to document at 2:13 with two papers due tomorrow (
- Anarchy Ninja
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:12 am
- Location: Back
on the topic of space suprerioty you know whats funny. all the US style space shuttles are grounded because they keep finding faults with them, yet the old russian space rocket design seems to continue to performksslemp wrote:If indeed you believe this, I feel sorry for you.spurgistan wrote:If by that you mean the exact opposite, than you're right, as Sputnik, the world's first man-made satellite, forced the West to consider how an "inferior" economic system had bested them, and forced them to redouble their space program to prove to the world that capitalism was better. So, pressure from the Soviet sphere forced the ... ahem... [stifled giggle]... "democracies" [bursts into laughter] to reconsider their system.ksslemp wrote:Do you believe they would have developed these things without the pressure brought on them from the worlds democracies?spurgistan wrote:I'm still not liking this whole "taking the USSR to represent Marxism thing... WHICH IT DIDN'T AND NEVER DID!" thing, but... ya heard of Sputnik? Crazy commies figured out a computer or two.DIRESTRAITS wrote:So Anarchist, do you really need the computer your sitting at?
Don't fear Truth, Embrace it!
Sputnik was a paper tiger.

- ksslemp
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Slemp, KY 41763 Pop. 'nough
- Contact:
And like the "Democratic Republic of North Korea"Anarchy Ninja wrote:its kind of in the name you know, united soviet SOCIALIST republiceverywhere116 wrote:Then define communism and what the USSR was.Anarchy Ninja wrote:how many people have already told you that was NOT COMMUNISMeverywhere116 wrote:I believe that the communists will be sick of living in communism and move to the capitalistic city. This has been done before. See: Berlin, 1946-1989.
-
foolish_yeti
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 5:09 pm
- Location: nowhere
Just a question- if poor people are poor because of lack of education and motivation, then it would also follow that racial minorities are inherently stupid and lazy.DIRESTRAITS wrote:my last post before I go to bed. There are 3 things a person needs to do to "break the cycle" and get out of povert.
1) GET EDUCATED!!!!!!(you can do it)
2) don't have babies before you're ready (use a condom)
3) Don't get into drugs
And we're not even looking outside of North America here.
Have fun getting an education if you live in a developing country. My god, how can entire countries be stupid and lazy? If only they'd pull up their bootstraps and hit the books!
I apologize at the sarcasm.
- everywhere116
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:37 am
- Location: Somewhere on this big blue marble.
- everywhere116
- Posts: 1718
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:37 am
- Location: Somewhere on this big blue marble.
Will a commie please respond to this?everywhere116 wrote:To me you represent the liberals and their stance you are taking.foolish_yeti wrote:Not sure who I represent to you...everywhere116 wrote:And I congratulate you. But, what's this? Applying yourself? Getting an education? Things that we are telling you and everyone you represent to do?
But I am privileged. I recognize that I have had much more help in succeeding than many students can ever hope to get.
But I thought school was free, and, in fact, forced? How can you deny they cannot get an education?
"Disease, suffering, hardship...that is what war is all about."-Captain Kirk, from "A Taste of Armageddon"
- Anarchy Ninja
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:12 am
- Location: Back
from memory the USSR was under entirely different system then communism and marxist it was defined as leninist or marxist-leninist, because they are differing systems. marxist is a form of socialism, socialism is supposed to be before communism as it is implemented before there is enough of everything for everyone.ksslemp wrote:And like the "Democratic Republic of North Korea"Anarchy Ninja wrote:its kind of in the name you know, united soviet SOCIALIST republiceverywhere116 wrote:Then define communism and what the USSR was.Anarchy Ninja wrote:how many people have already told you that was NOT COMMUNISMeverywhere116 wrote:I believe that the communists will be sick of living in communism and move to the capitalistic city. This has been done before. See: Berlin, 1946-1989.

- ksslemp
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Slemp, KY 41763 Pop. 'nough
- Contact:
Is Hail a Fault? HmmmAnarchy Ninja wrote:on the topic of space suprerioty you know whats funny. all the US style space shuttles are grounded because they keep finding faults with them, yet the old russian space rocket design seems to continue to performksslemp wrote:If indeed you believe this, I feel sorry for you.spurgistan wrote:If by that you mean the exact opposite, than you're right, as Sputnik, the world's first man-made satellite, forced the West to consider how an "inferior" economic system had bested them, and forced them to redouble their space program to prove to the world that capitalism was better. So, pressure from the Soviet sphere forced the ... ahem... [stifled giggle]... "democracies" [bursts into laughter] to reconsider their system.ksslemp wrote:Do you believe they would have developed these things without the pressure brought on them from the worlds democracies?spurgistan wrote:I'm still not liking this whole "taking the USSR to represent Marxism thing... WHICH IT DIDN'T AND NEVER DID!" thing, but... ya heard of Sputnik? Crazy commies figured out a computer or two.DIRESTRAITS wrote:So Anarchist, do you really need the computer your sitting at?
Don't fear Truth, Embrace it!
Sputnik was a paper tiger.
I dont remember ever seeing a russian reusable shuttle, i remember they were working on a design and not surprisingly it looked like the U.S. shuttle.
I'm not trying to make this an American against Russian thing, I'm just saying that without the pressure of the cold war, they would have no desire for those kinds of advancements. They would keep the status quo.
- Anarchy Ninja
- Posts: 1357
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:12 am
- Location: Back
just because it is free and forced does not mean that everyone will still get the opportunityeverywhere116 wrote:Will a commie please respond to this?everywhere116 wrote:To me you represent the liberals and their stance you are taking.foolish_yeti wrote:Not sure who I represent to you...everywhere116 wrote:And I congratulate you. But, what's this? Applying yourself? Getting an education? Things that we are telling you and everyone you represent to do?
But I am privileged. I recognize that I have had much more help in succeeding than many students can ever hope to get.
But I thought school was free, and, in fact, forced? How can you deny they cannot get an education?
