allmaneaglesfan & taenicole [cleared]

[jak111]

Accused:

allmaneaglesfan
taenicole


The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy


Game number(s):

Game 9406293 (game I'm in)
Game 9364518 (their first game)
and EVERY SINGLE game that Taenicole has ever played.


Comments:
Well first I joined a game and nothing seemed out of place, just another 4 player free for all. Then I noticed this round (round 9 for after this round passes) Green had a chance to break Red and never did so when he is clearly winning. So just thinking it was nothing but checking just in case I found every single game Taenicole has ever played was with allmaneaglesfan. I don't know if they do this often but allmaneaglesfan seems to win the majority.

Now this might just be nothing but I'd like this looked into just in case this is a secret diplomacy or multi's.
Note though: allmaneaglesfan and taenicole's first game togeather was a PRIVATE 1v1 game. Then the rest are all public's.

Also note that: checking their turn logs it seems there's usually a 30-60min break in between turns, either their a skilled multi that waits before they go with their other account or they could just be Secret Diplomacy and helping each other over pm's.

LASTLY note that: Their very first game they never spoke in public chat so presumming that it was in deed private chat from the beggining, it could be friends doing secret diplomacy's.

EDIT

Both are in the US but there's thousands of users in the US, but that narrows down the chance of multi's not being possible due to their within the same country, area though is unknown to me.

So if a mod or someone could check into this I'd be thankful, I don't mind playing against good strategising short term teams in free for all, but if its cheating involved I don't wish to be playing them if they can't fight fair.

Also, tae joined a day after eagles. That might not mean anything but it adds to the questioning of possible multi's.

[king achilles]

Cleared of being multis. As for a possible secret diplomacy, right now, perhaps green is more keen in defending his area bonus than break red's area bonus in Canada.

[jak111]

Alright, thanks for the quick reply, though any news on the all games green played has been with red? that's what really got my attention to the whole thing.

EDIT*

relooking at their games all of their free for alls have been won by one of them or a new recruit thats also in a few of their games named izzer except for like 3-6 games.. Their also playing team doubles of course.. on the same teams.

Thats just some added info in case it wasn't checked, but if not enough for a re-evaluation its alright.

EDIT EDIT*

Wow, even blue won't target red. I just broke both of their bonuses with what troops I had left. If this suspicious gameplay continues can there at least be a noted for any future complaints on these three??