Blitz plays a lot of games with players he like. I totally understand if he did not want to play a dug, he just could not behave and tried to get all players in game to do what he wanted them to do. He just could not play his game and let others play theirs, he wanted to control all moves to make him win the game. If you intimidate players to do what you tell them it is pretty easy to win every game. In a singles game you are supposed to be single. I never make any ingame deals as I see that as unethical even if I put it in chat. If you have an ingame deal to offer you probably have a players who need to be dealt with, and if you see that any other good player should see the same thing and go after him/her as well, thus no need for deals.DUG WAS NOT SCARED OF ANY1 DAV. BLITZ WAS SCARED OF DUG. DUG CHALLENGED BLITZ 24/7
Petition For Dugcarr1 Back. Sign Up and Stick It To the Man
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Wrong? You mean like........morally?
Luck is rewarded in the short term, skill is rewarded in the long term
Luck is rewarded in the short term, skill is rewarded in the long term
... This isn't about some silly game. This is about Freedom of Speech, man! This is about our rights, as human beings, being violated by these fascist mods! This is about the people, standing up against the intolerance of these power-mad ... Republicans!
... (please, God, don't let anybody take this seriously!)
... (please, God, don't let anybody take this seriously!)
I like how this is on page 7, and you have 6 people signing your petition. Less then 1 per page.
Roll on dude... you're changing the world 1.67 pages at a time!
Roll on dude... you're changing the world 1.67 pages at a time!
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
- alex_white101
- Posts: 1992
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:05 am
Now this is just me, understand...
If he was banned for 4 months, after all this idiocy has ensued, I would extend the ban to eternal permanence. Just because I like slapping down idiots that run their loud idiot mouths but really have no clue. That's just me.
If he had apologized, and said I was just mad and acted inappropriately out of haste and anger, and it won't happen again, then I would have welcomed him back after the four months.
Me though, at this juncture, I'd have it out of my mind with him gone for good. I'd feel real good about it. I'd laugh at the refund inquiry. It would be a real knee slapper.
If he was banned for 4 months, after all this idiocy has ensued, I would extend the ban to eternal permanence. Just because I like slapping down idiots that run their loud idiot mouths but really have no clue. That's just me.
If he had apologized, and said I was just mad and acted inappropriately out of haste and anger, and it won't happen again, then I would have welcomed him back after the four months.
Me though, at this juncture, I'd have it out of my mind with him gone for good. I'd feel real good about it. I'd laugh at the refund inquiry. It would be a real knee slapper.
Don't forget to spread a little sunshine, and to bring a towel.
- Sammy gags
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 6:26 pm
- Location: ?????
He has shown regret for what he did in some of the game chat, but he won't come back to CC even if the ban is taken offJimRocky wrote:If he had apologized, and said I was just mad and acted inappropriately out of haste and anger, and it won't happen again, then I would have welcomed him back after the four months.

- tahitiwahini
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm
Well then, that changes everything!Sammy gags wrote:He has shown regret for what he did in some of the game chat, but he won't come back to CC even if the ban is taken offJimRocky wrote:If he had apologized, and said I was just mad and acted inappropriately out of haste and anger, and it won't happen again, then I would have welcomed him back after the four months.
Did he show regret that he got caught or that he got banned?
Feel free to post these snippets of regret, I would love to see them.
Do any of these snippets of regret on Dug's part show any understanding that he harmed other players in his game-throwing point-giveaway jihad?
I'm glad to hear he won't be coming back to CC even if the ban is taken off.
If he applogizes and expresses remorse I guess he would be doing those things just because it's the right thing to do and not as any part of a quid pro quo to get back on the site.
Well, I guess we shouldn't be speculating about something that hasn't happened yet, should we?
Cheers,
Tahitiwahini
Tahitiwahini
- No Risk No Fun
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:29 pm
- Location: OH
Rights are a privilige that can be taken away. Even if you are paying for premium, it is still a privilige that you should not abuse. Remember, you are paying for premium, not for a share of the site.Nobunaga wrote:... This isn't about some silly game. This is about Freedom of Speech, man! This is about our rights, as human beings, being violated by these fascist mods! This is about the people, standing up against the intolerance of these power-mad ... Republicans!
... (please, God, don't let anybody take this seriously!)
Listen dumbfuck, this is the internet. You have no right to due process OR free speech. Read the fucking TOS of just about every website and you'll begin to understand.what,me worry? wrote: I agree that what Dug did was wrong, you guys seem to be missing the point....... Let me try you one more time.
Its the way it was handled. Multis get god knows how mant chances, yet Dugg gets the boot after one. Taking Dugg off the score system? WTF? Taking away his right to Rebuttle......... nice one guys, way to deny a man his basic freedom to defend himself. Cancelling games,....... WOW.....Do I even need to comment. Everyone needs to look past the person and look at the basic rights that are being denied. If the mods have a problem with us, then they get to shut us up, cancel our games (even after money has been paid for a service), and have idiot lemmings who dont read between the lines talk sh*t about someone who cant even respond. Sounds great guys. If this is the ideal image of what this site is, then please accept this as my resignation.
In rememberance of Koolbak.
The point of ALL of this is that Dugcarr CHEATED this site and CHEATED however many HUNDREDS of other people who PAID for a membership. Is it fair to anyone on this site to be robbed of their enjoyment by some dumbfuck with an axe to grind?
f*ck Dugcarr and his cheating ass, and f*ck you for licking the cum drippings off his nuts.
There is no luck, only preparation and execution.
Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
- what,me worry?
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:40 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Bay area, California
Wow.... this 12 year old has some spunk. if you talk sh*t I hope your ready to back it up. I'll set up 11 doubles games, loser leaves CC. Lets go hero.IronE.GLE wrote:Listen dumbfuck, this is the internet. You have no right to due process OR free speech. Read the fucking TOS of just about every website and you'll begin to understand.what,me worry? wrote: I agree that what Dug did was wrong, you guys seem to be missing the point....... Let me try you one more time.
Its the way it was handled. Multis get god knows how mant chances, yet Dugg gets the boot after one. Taking Dugg off the score system? WTF? Taking away his right to Rebuttle......... nice one guys, way to deny a man his basic freedom to defend himself. Cancelling games,....... WOW.....Do I even need to comment. Everyone needs to look past the person and look at the basic rights that are being denied. If the mods have a problem with us, then they get to shut us up, cancel our games (even after money has been paid for a service), and have idiot lemmings who dont read between the lines talk sh*t about someone who cant even respond. Sounds great guys. If this is the ideal image of what this site is, then please accept this as my resignation.
In rememberance of Koolbak.
The point of ALL of this is that Dugcarr CHEATED this site and CHEATED however many HUNDREDS of other people who PAID for a membership. Is it fair to anyone on this site to be robbed of their enjoyment by some dumbfuck with an axe to grind?
f*ck Dugcarr and his cheating ass, and f*ck you for licking the cum drippings off his nuts.
Make it 1 game, and I'll take Benji you bitch.what,me worry? wrote: Wow.... this 12 year old has some spunk. if you talk sh*t I hope your ready to back it up. I'll set up 11 doubles games, loser leaves CC. Lets go hero.
*after looking at benjij's profile, I retract the previous statement
Sequential, flat rate, unlimited.*
There is no luck, only preparation and execution.
Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
- tahitiwahini
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm
One has to be nuts to accept a challenge from one of Dug's Praetorian guard if the stakes are that the loser has to leave CC. It's a lose - lose proposition for the challenge acceptor.
If you win, Dug's friend will theoretically leave the site, which most of them have been threatening to do ad nauseum already. As such they have nothing of value to them at stake in the challenge. Also, one has to ask whether they would honor their commitments. After all they have threatened repeatedly to leave and haven't done so.
If you lose, you would have to leave the site. Dug's friends would insist on that and you being an honorable player would be bound to do so.
The person who would accept the challenge under those circumstances is a fool.
If you win, Dug's friend will theoretically leave the site, which most of them have been threatening to do ad nauseum already. As such they have nothing of value to them at stake in the challenge. Also, one has to ask whether they would honor their commitments. After all they have threatened repeatedly to leave and haven't done so.
If you lose, you would have to leave the site. Dug's friends would insist on that and you being an honorable player would be bound to do so.
The person who would accept the challenge under those circumstances is a fool.
Cheers,
Tahitiwahini
Tahitiwahini
Honestly I'm not that concerned about it. He keeps whining and 'threatening' to leave CC, but has yet to do so. I cannot resist the irony of the entire situation.
There is no luck, only preparation and execution.
Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
- Sammy gags
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 6:26 pm
- Location: ?????
- what,me worry?
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 3:40 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Bay area, California
mmm....the smell of fear. I'll compromise. Best of 7 leaves. And Dont worry, I have some partners in mind. Pack your sh*t up sparky, your out of here.IronE.GLE wrote:Honestly I'm not that concerned about it. He keeps whining and 'threatening' to leave CC, but has yet to do so. I cannot resist the irony of the entire situation.
Tahititwit shut the f*ck up....you are so fucking annoying ! Hey why dont you team up with the other dumbfuck there and play. I will be glad to back up WMW in a elimination match to get rid of your dumbasses. K now go ahead and keep posting your rebuttles you fucking pussy, seriously all talk....just keep responding behind the safety of your keyboard. You would get slapped silly live sir.
-Sub-
-Sub-
- tahitiwahini
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm
Subjekt, can you name a single person who has left the site as a result of Dug's ban? I mean besides Dug, who's actually still got 5 games to finish before he fades away.subjekt wrote:Tahititwit shut the f*ck up....you are so fucking annoying ! Hey why dont you team up with the other dumbfuck there and play. I will be glad to back up WMW in a elimination match to get rid of your dumbasses. K now go ahead and keep posting your rebuttles you fucking pussy, seriously all talk....just keep responding behind the safety of your keyboard. You would get slapped silly live sir.
-Sub-
I don't mean threatened to leave, I mean left. As in not here anymore. As in not continuing to post in the forums and play games. I mean the kind of leaving where if you didn't know better you'd think the person wasn't here anymore.
That's not a very difficult challenge is it? You can respond from behind the safety of your keyboard if you'd like.
Sorry wicked, I got a little bit out of control there. I'll try to watch my language better in the future. It won't happen again.
Cheers,
Tahitiwahini
Tahitiwahini
There is no compromise. ONE game, sudden death. Lose you leave.what,i better start to worry! wrote:mmm....the smell of fear. I'll compromise. Best of 7 leaves. And Dont worry, I have some partners in mind. Pack your sh*t up sparky, your out of here.IronE.GLE wrote:Honestly I'm not that concerned about it. He keeps whining and 'threatening' to leave CC, but has yet to do so. I cannot resist the irony of the entire situation.
How is that for fear?
There is no luck, only preparation and execution.
Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
tahitiwahini wrote:Subjekt, can you name a single person who has left the site as a result of Dug's ban? I mean besides Dug, who's actually still got 5 games to finish before he fades away.
I don't mean threatened to leave, I mean left. As in not here anymore. As in not continuing to post in the forums and play games. I mean the kind of leaving where if you didn't know better you'd think the person wasn't here anymore.
obviously the impact this has on the community wont be an overnight ordeal. I'm starting to think you live in a bubble and can't comprehend how things in life actually work. Maybe you're just a little boy and that would explain things better to me. So I'm just going to look at you as a little boy so I can dumb myself down for you...
In situations like this one (little timmy) people get upset. When they get upset they tend to avoid (not bother with) things that make them feel this way. Are you still with me (little timmy)? Just because it makes them upset a couple times here and there it doesn't make them want to completely stop when they can have so much fun doing it. Well (little timmy) if people continue to be upset by something more and more they tend to stop liking it as much as they once did.
This is the problem we have now (little timmy) is because those people who have become upset by this are not enjoying it as much as they once did.
- tahitiwahini
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm
Little timmy wants to know: So all the talk about leaving wasn't really true then? It was a temper tantrum? When little timmy gets upset his mommy usually sends him to his room for a timeout. Is that where the people have gone then? Little timmy is just asking because clearly you are someone who knows how things in life actually work. Little timmy might even venture to guess that you don't live in a bubble. If you need to you can dumb yourself down another couple of notches if you think it helps you make your argument. So if you could just answer little timmy's question that would be great.Molacole wrote:tahitiwahini wrote:Subjekt, can you name a single person who has left the site as a result of Dug's ban? I mean besides Dug, who's actually still got 5 games to finish before he fades away.
I don't mean threatened to leave, I mean left. As in not here anymore. As in not continuing to post in the forums and play games. I mean the kind of leaving where if you didn't know better you'd think the person wasn't here anymore.
obviously the impact this has on the community wont be an overnight ordeal. I'm starting to think you live in a bubble and can't comprehend how things in life actually work. Maybe you're just a little boy and that would explain things better to me. So I'm just going to look at you as a little boy so I can dumb myself down for you...
In situations like this one (little timmy) people get upset. When they get upset they tend to avoid (not bother with) things that make them feel this way. Are you still with me (little timmy)? Just because it makes them upset a couple times here and there it doesn't make them want to completely stop when they can have so much fun doing it. Well (little timmy) if people continue to be upset by something more and more they tend to stop liking it as much as they once did.
This is the problem we have now (little timmy) is because those people who have become upset by this are not enjoying it as much as they once did.
Who has left the site due to Dug's being banned.
You can write the name of the player who has left right here (with a crayon if you prefer): __________
Then little timmy will be happy.
Please don't use big words, because little timmy isn't used to that in the bubble. Just a simple name will do.
Please don't keep little timmy waiting....
Cheers,
Tahitiwahini
Tahitiwahini
- tahitiwahini
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:26 pm
Did you dumb yourself down a couple of notches from the last post... because little timmy couldn't tell the difference?Molacole wrote:again you've completely missed the point little timmy. Well done...
obviously the impact this has on the community wont be an overnight ordeal.
It's not about who's leaving and who isn't. It's about who's renewing and who isn't...
Anyway, all these words make little timmy's head hurt.
He's really just waiting for you to name one player who's left the site over Dug's ban. It doesn't even have to be a real player, it could be a multi if that helps. Anyone Molacole? Anyone?
You're putting little timmy through quite an ordeal, because you refuse to give him one name of someone who's left the site over Dug's ban.
If you want to shift your argument away from people actually leaving to people not renewing that's OK (little timmy will be disappointed, but he'll get over it).
Name one player who has not renewed over Dug's banning.
It's not nice to keep stringing little timmy along.
Cheers,
Tahitiwahini
Tahitiwahini