WWII - Eastern Front-statistic page 1 [Quenched]5000 finish

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:27 am

57 vote more and finish.

t.e.c · Post by **t.e.c** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:00 am

qeee1 wrote:20% ftw

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:02 am

t.e.c wrote:
qeee1 wrote:20% ftw

So many dancing things..

t.e.c · Post by **t.e.c** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:09 am

i really want the 20%. actually i really want the map to get finished, so tis thread can die a death which would have been noble if it had happened, oh, 50 pages ago...

alster · Post by **alster** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:00 am

qwert wrote: vote is in progres please vote

I cannot help to get the feeling that you're spending more time posting in the forum than designing your maps...

(Maps that looks great btw, but you already know I think highly of them.)

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:11 am

These not my fault Alstergren, half of these "problems" will be solve if i have some right in my topic, in these way i dont want too again some minor thing prolonge my work in these map.

Ninja-Town · Post by **Ninja-Town** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:55 am

qwert wrote:Ok ,Ninja Town maybe you dont bee here in last several days, but question is not blur, the river must be smooth not blur, and people vote for these, but how many smooth, we dont know these, and in these poll we will know these.

No I understand, it just seems to me that smoothing out the river is pretty easy to do, and really wouldn't take that long. Your poll means nothing because even zoomed in a bit it looks the same. I don't care what % you do, and Im sure no one else cares what % you do, they just want your map to look like a map and not pixelized. So Why are you wasting so much time?

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:28 am

No i dont waste my time, maybe you dont mine but, belive me people who most atack to rivers bee smooth ,the care so much then you. And if only 1 say"no its not good smooth" all my work is drop in water.

Ruben Cassar · Post by **Ruben Cassar** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:43 am

Just finish the poll today because the options are all so similar that it does not matter much which one you choose and anyway a lot of people have already voted and so the most popular choice will be made. You are just prolonging the process now.

Then after this issue is settled you can start working on the next amendment.

boberz · Post by **boberz** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:40 am

qwert you can do whatever you want to your map and that is fine amd within your right. However what you cannot do is if somebody asks you to change it back or do something different is refue.

Nobody asked to what % the smoothness should be so you should have takent he initiative now you have pointed it out it will take ages to dicuss this is all your own doing

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:54 am

So Boberz you want to say that i decide how much smooth too bee ?

boberz · Post by **boberz** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:00 am

ye si think you should and that is what i voted for but i dont think you should even have bothered put it to a poll these minor choices are what you can decide

hulmey · Post by **hulmey** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:28 pm

hey boberz, whats the rush...At least the map is back and being worked on....

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:04 pm

Ok here a map, the rivers is smooth and borders is blur.
I put something new, only for orientation too people better know wath part of europe these map present, i put names of sea and gulfs, enjoy.

AndrewB · Post by **AndrewB** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:27 pm

You didn't change Ternopil to Ternopol, but you have changed Dnepropetrovsk to Dnipropetrovsk wrongly.

It should be Ternopol and Dnepropetrovsk.

EDIT: Also you have changed Cherkassy to Cherkasy. It should be Cherkassy.

All you needed to change was Ternopil to Ternopol, nothing else. Leave everything else as it was.

EDIT 2: You have also changed Polotsk to Polatsk, Polatsk is Belarusian language, you wanted them all in Russian. Polotsk is Russian name.

Ninja-Town · Post by **Ninja-Town** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:32 pm

its such a cool map!

Lt. Valerian · Post by **Lt. Valerian** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:34 pm

Look, after looking at half a dozen maps of Eastern Europe, including one from the United Nations, I have seen all sorts of variations for the names of these cities. In fact, the UN one had the names the same as Qwert has them here. I think that they are good enough.

Good work Qwert!

AndrewB · Post by **AndrewB** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:09 pm

Lt. Valerian wrote:Look, after looking at half a dozen maps of Eastern Europe, including one from the United Nations, I have seen all sorts of variations for the names of these cities. In fact, the UN one had the names the same as Qwert has them here. I think that they are good enough.

Good work Qwert!

Look, the difference between me and you is that you don't know the history/languages of that region. I grew up there. And I have already explained why different sources have different spelling.

One is Russian transliteration and another is Ukrainian transliteration.

qwert has decided to use Russian transliteration. Me and other people have agreed to that. What happened is that some of the cities are still in Ukrainian transliteration. Both spellings are correct. BUT this is just inconsistent.

It won't matter for most non-Ukrainian/non-Russian speakers of this site, but for some who are, it is just jumps right into face.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:12 pm

OK now andrew, i want to put a combination of belarus, rusian, ukrainian, and others names in map and i will put to stay like now, becouse these names translate to english is not mistake, and i dont want too put names only from rusian translation.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:21 pm

These a combination and no mistake
Dnipropetrovsk-ukrainian translation
Polatsk-belarusian translation
Cherkasy-ukrainian translation
Saaremaa-estonian
Every these names are english translation

AndrewB · Post by **AndrewB** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:47 pm

qwert wrote:These a combination and no mistake
Dnipropetrovsk-ukrainian translation
Polatsk-belarusian translation
Cherkasy-ukrainian translation
Saaremaa-estonian
Every these names are english translation

But you have said:

qwert wrote:well if i can find site for citi names of USSr from 1941 then i will know what to do.

If you are using Ukrainian transliteration, use it everywhere! If you are using Russian transliteration, again be consistent!

It makes more sense to use Russian transliteration everywhere, because in USSR state language was Russian.

Make up your mind, qwert.

hulmey · Post by **hulmey** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:49 pm

i think he has...and discussion closed hopefully

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:57 pm

I did, and these not mistake, becouse i dont know all Rusian names for every terittory, and these is good, and i belive that people agree with these.

AndrewB · Post by **AndrewB** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:10 pm

qwert wrote:I did, and these not mistake, becouse i dont know all Rusian names for every terittory, and these is good, and i belive that people agree with these.

Which one is it? Russian or national language?

Ninja-Town · Post by **Ninja-Town** » Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:11 pm

Okay city names....done
pixelized river blurred.....done

anything else????