Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for children
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
Army of GOD
- Posts: 7178
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Only if we can have a thread dedicated to Jasmine...
mrswdk is a ho
- InsomniaRed
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:58 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: In Nick's heart
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
I would have a thread dedicated to every Aladdin character individuallyArmy of GOD wrote:Only if we can have a thread dedicated to Jasmine...
- I will always love you Nick, Forever.
- I will always love you Nick, Forever.
- Juan_Bottom
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
- Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
- muy_thaiguy
- Posts: 12730
- Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Back in Black
- Contact:
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Wasn't Belle only there for like 3-4 days at the most with talking/singing/dancing household items? Not exactly alone, plus she was more or less free to roam the castle (minus the one room with the flower).Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
-Anonymous
What, you expected something deep or flashy?
- MeDeFe
- Posts: 7831
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
- Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Stockholm Syndrome.Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
And yes, it's a very good explanation for Belle's changing attitude toward her abductor, even to the point of falling in love with him. It's a defense mechanism against being in a situation you have no control over and which goes against your own wishes, if escape is impossible and you cannot influence the situation you have to change your outlook, convince yourself that you approve of the motives of your captor, eventually you adopt them as your own and may choose to remain with your captor even if a chance at escape or rescue presents itself.
The message of the movie then? It's ok to abduct people, eventually they will approve of it themselves.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
- natty dread
- Posts: 12876
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
- Location: just plain fucked
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Take your hate speech elsewhere, please.ben79 wrote:i'll have to clear something out : walt disney hated jews = fact --------- jews are a race = false, it is a religion that's all, so anyone can freely hate jews or any other religious people without being a racist = fact

Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
that's actually hilarious, i never thought about the interpretation of belle having symptoms of stockholm syndrome, although i highly doubt that's what the creators had in mind...
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
- natty dread
- Posts: 12876
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
- Location: just plain fucked
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
It all makes sense if you really think about it!john9blue wrote:that's actually hilarious, i never thought about the interpretation of belle having symptoms of stockholm syndrome, although i highly doubt that's what the creators had in mind...

Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Dear God, how can I ever take my daughter on Peter Pan ride again.


- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
I'm all about Dreamworks and Disney, pretty much animation of all sort's but ahem:


Chel from Dreamworks, Road to El Dorado is like the leading cause of Pre-Teen Boners in North America.
Any way about Disney, Maybe some of the stories have somewhat racist or sexist elements to them, but that doesn't mean that the stories are inherently racist or sexist or preach that kind of message. Besides would you rather that all childrens entertainment become complete sanitized and devoid of everything that's reminiscent of real world situations? Would you prefer that every kids movie be a bunch of big eyed singing mice talking abut friendship and teamwork? People always underestimate the childrens market, and by proxy children.
Also in searching for a good picture of Chel I came across this hilarious little nugget:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Dp22KRD5zM
I hope you like animated Elton Johns!
Dreamworks animation studios is a company that's about creating entertainment for the family, not about showing sex to children or encouraging them to be slutty or stupid.


Chel from Dreamworks, Road to El Dorado is like the leading cause of Pre-Teen Boners in North America.
Any way about Disney, Maybe some of the stories have somewhat racist or sexist elements to them, but that doesn't mean that the stories are inherently racist or sexist or preach that kind of message. Besides would you rather that all childrens entertainment become complete sanitized and devoid of everything that's reminiscent of real world situations? Would you prefer that every kids movie be a bunch of big eyed singing mice talking abut friendship and teamwork? People always underestimate the childrens market, and by proxy children.
Also in searching for a good picture of Chel I came across this hilarious little nugget:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Dp22KRD5zM
I hope you like animated Elton Johns!
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
please tell me where's the hate in that sentence, can you elaborate on it please, i don't see itnatty_dread wrote:Take your hate speech elsewhere, please.ben79 wrote:i'll have to clear something out : walt disney hated jews = fact --------- jews are a race = false, it is a religion that's all, so anyone can freely hate jews or any other religious people without being a racist = fact
- natty dread
- Posts: 12876
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
- Location: just plain fucked
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Surely you understand that saying things like "it's not racism if you hate jews" can be considered hate speech.ben79 wrote:please tell me where's the hate in that sentence, can you elaborate on it please, i don't see itnatty_dread wrote:Take your hate speech elsewhere, please.ben79 wrote:i'll have to clear something out : walt disney hated jews = fact --------- jews are a race = false, it is a religion that's all, so anyone can freely hate jews or any other religious people without being a racist = fact

Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
I think he is just trying to make an argument that anti-semitism is a different form of bigotry and not racist as such.natty_dread wrote:Surely you understand that saying things like "it's not racism if you hate jews" can be considered hate speech.ben79 wrote:please tell me where's the hate in that sentence, can you elaborate on it please, i don't see itnatty_dread wrote:Take your hate speech elsewhere, please.ben79 wrote:i'll have to clear something out : walt disney hated jews = fact --------- jews are a race = false, it is a religion that's all, so anyone can freely hate jews or any other religious people without being a racist = fact

- stahrgazer
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
I guess you missed the part where Beast showed a heart and compassion after all, which is what led to Belle deciding he wasn't such a terrible thing after all?
As for Disney being sexist: sure. Very few he/she's in Disney. Most females had decidedly female attitudes, and most men had decidedly male attitudes. Some women had evil female attitudes, some had benevolent; some men had evil male attitudes, some benevolent.. but definitely there were gender traits.
What, precisely, is wrong with women being women and men being men? I don't get the idea that "human equality means we're exactly the same." I like diversity.
But yeah, let's condemn Disney because Walt was a product of 1920's attitudes and some of his creations show it. My god, he even had an Uncle Rhemus in Song of the South, that terrible man! Then again, was any of that "showing signs of the times" decidedly nasty? No.
As for Dreamworks, there was a movie with ants, and the evil ants happened to be a lot darker than the hero ants... is that a sign of modern racism?

- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
AHA!!! I found it! I was looking for this:
The Disney Vault (TV Funhouse)
It's on Hulu so I apologize for submitting you to whatever advertisement they throw on before it, but it's worth it.
The Disney Vault (TV Funhouse)
It's on Hulu so I apologize for submitting you to whatever advertisement they throw on before it, but it's worth it.
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
That it promotes a flawed idea of gender?stahrgazer wrote: As for Disney being sexist: sure. Very few he/she's in Disney. Most females had decidedly female attitudes, and most men had decidedly male attitudes. Some women had evil female attitudes, some had benevolent; some men had evil male attitudes, some benevolent.. but definitely there were gender traits.
What, precisely, is wrong with women being women and men being men? I don't get the idea that "human equality means we're exactly the same." I like diversity.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
- MeDeFe
- Posts: 7831
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
- Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
I see, so you're saying it's ok to abduct people as long as you're compassionate about it. Great moral of the story, bro!stahrgazer wrote:I guess you missed the part where Beast showed a heart and compassion after all, which is what led to Belle deciding he wasn't such a terrible thing after all?Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
*snip*
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
- Juan_Bottom
- Posts: 1110
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
- Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Did it feel racist?stahrgazer wrote:
As for Dreamworks, there was a movie with ants, and the evil ants happened to be a lot darker than the hero ants... is that a sign of modern racism?
Well I don't actually watch Dreamworks pictures myself. But that's clearly just traditional garb, so I really commend Dreamworks for making a children's film that's fun and friendly to South American traditions. They're like children's PBS in theaters. Unlike Disney with the film Aladdin, which is more destructive to Arab Culture than beneficial to it.The Bison King wrote:Chel from Dreamworks, Road to El Dorado is like the leading cause of Pre-Teen Boners in North America.
- InsomniaRed
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:58 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: In Nick's heart
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Good thing Aladdin was an American movie and not an Arabian one!
- I will always love you Nick, Forever.
- I will always love you Nick, Forever.
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
What?! are you serious? If you don't even watch Dreamworks movies you don't have a clue what you are talking about. Chel was a thief and mega slut. Like the worst example for women ever! Also there's like mass human sacrifice in that movie. Basically the 2 white guys pretty much tell south American Indians that they're doing it wrong, and make them stop.Well I don't actually watch Dreamworks pictures myself. But that's clearly just traditional garb, so I really commend Dreamworks for making a children's film that's fun and friendly to South American traditions. They're like children's PBS in theaters. Unlike Disney with the film Aladdin, which is more destructive to Arab Culture than beneficial to it.
THAT SOUNDS AWFUL! Who want's to watch that?They're like children's PBS in theaters.
Last edited by The Bison King on Thu Mar 03, 2011 5:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- stahrgazer
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Well, if you recall, the supposedly "abducted" people trespassed on Beast's land; it's not like he went to the city looking to abduct Belle. So wasn't it fair of Beast to hold them accountable for trespassing?MeDeFe wrote:I see, so you're saying it's ok to abduct people as long as you're compassionate about it. Great moral of the story, bro!stahrgazer wrote:I guess you missed the part where Beast showed a heart and compassion after all, which is what led to Belle deciding he wasn't such a terrible thing after all?Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
*snip*

Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
Only skimmed thread, but regardless of what Walt was or wasn't, Disney, as a maker of cartoons, is just pretty bad at what they do.
Nick/CN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Disney
Nick/CN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Disney
- stahrgazer
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: Figment of the Imagination...
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
I'd say it's about as racist as the movies you named from Disney. I mean, my gosh, they made the bad guy DARK.. just like, my gosh, Disney made the circus workers DARK.Juan_Bottom wrote:Did it feel racist?stahrgazer wrote: As for Dreamworks, there was a movie with ants, and the evil ants happened to be a lot darker than the hero ants... is that a sign of modern racism?
Wonder how one explains Mickey Mouse (black mouse, but a good guy) in Disney terms, though...

- InsomniaRed
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:58 am
- Gender: Female
- Location: In Nick's heart
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
So if someone walked on my property, I can imprison them for trespassing, as long as I make them fall in love with me afterward? I'm confused at the logic behind this movie now.stahrgazer wrote:Well, if you recall, the supposedly "abducted" people trespassed on Beast's land; it's not like he went to the city looking to abduct Belle. So wasn't it fair of Beast to hold them accountable for trespassing?MeDeFe wrote:I see, so you're saying it's ok to abduct people as long as you're compassionate about it. Great moral of the story, bro!stahrgazer wrote:I guess you missed the part where Beast showed a heart and compassion after all, which is what led to Belle deciding he wasn't such a terrible thing after all?Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
*snip*
- I will always love you Nick, Forever.
- I will always love you Nick, Forever.
Re: Disney is for the sexists/racist, Dreamworks is for chil
The logic some use to make judgments upon very old Disney movies is an example of "Historian's Fallacy- occurs when one assumes that decision makers of the past viewed events from the same perspective and having the same information as those subsequently analyzing the decision."
Some are looking at this stuff through the prism of today's thinking and ignoring the actual times these movies were made. Not only do they make their own subjective judgments about the meanings, but also assume that everyone else should think the same way.
The haters need to relax.
Some are looking at this stuff through the prism of today's thinking and ignoring the actual times these movies were made. Not only do they make their own subjective judgments about the meanings, but also assume that everyone else should think the same way.
The haters need to relax.

