Is this fair...?

[Vaati]

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=308237

As you can see, Yellow, or One Warrior is going to throw the game, just because lunchmeat wouldn't form an alliance with him. It'll probably take at least 2 or so turns to take him out, making us wait at least 2 extra days because of him.

I hate deadbeats. This is something negative feedback worthy, correct? Deadbeating because he doesn't get an alliance.

[AK_iceman]

Yeah, feel free to add him to your ignore list and give him negative feedback.

[bjn74]

You kind of jumped the gun on if he will actually deadbeat. Just wait and see.
To me he could just mean he wont really try and win since he knows hes going to lose. But deadbeating is negative feedback worthy, but make sure he does it.

[Vaati]

Oh, of course I'll make sure he becomes a deadbeat first. Doesn't look good to me to leave negative feedback if it wasn't worthy, it'll come back to haunt me. Hopefully he doesn't. I don't want to wait a day when its his turn.

[One Warrior]

Wow... slow down a second. I had no intention of cutting the game. All i said was that i could throw the game, as in change the outcome (who wins) with my last breath. I assume since i only have a few territories i'm going to die. And i didn't hit red because he refused the alliance; i hit him because he took out half of my territories. To me that seems ok. Just wanted to post this in my defense.

[Vaati]

Wow... slow down a second. I had no intention of cutting the game. All i said was that i could throw the game, as in change the outcome (who wins) with my last breath. I assume since i only have a few territories i'm going to die. And i didn't hit red because he refused the alliance; i hit him because he took out half of my territories. To me that seems ok. Just wanted to post this in my defense.

Yes, sorry. I thought when you said throw the game, that you would stop playing. Just a misunderstanding.

[One Warrior]

No worries.