SevenSociety wrote:I wont debate what is a matter of opinion. "And just one more time...the word slander means posts something untrue or made up." You are accusing me of a secret diplomacy and lying. In YOUR opinion you THINK what YOU did was NOT a suicide. You THINK that by handing you the game i could have cleared my name of your accusation. That is cohersion and is not allowed. You posted the facts in spite and that is also not allowed.
"I had posted it well before the game was over and for all I knew, I was going to win, so there simply was no reason for spite of vindictiveness" You claim that you knew you weren't going to win bc there was a secret diplomacy but then you claim for all you knew you were going to win so it wasn't out of vindictiveness. Well which one is it? or do you just want to twist the facts further. You got caught in a meaningless vindictive accusation and we are going to see how this plays out.
Im not caught in any meaningless vindictive accusation in any way.
I have posted that one of you wins in every single 3 player game you have ever played. That looks like cheating. I found it because on turn one, I saw the same thing happening in ours. That is to say, I was suspicious before having been suicided into or losing. In fact, I posted in spite of the fact that posting would probably seal my loss. Or in other words, was so convinced you were cheating, didnt even care about the game I was going to lose, and posted it because stopping two cheaters in my opinion was more important than any single game. That may very well be self-righteous, but it sure the hell isnt vindictive, and we will most certainly see how this plays out. In the past, with players favoring other players in games like this repeatedly and so obviously, they get blocked from playing each other. Otherwise, if enough evidence is not presented, they are cleared.
As far as the game goes, it was not suicide. Suicide is making a turn that insures your death no matter what. What I did was RISKY, but what I deemed my only chance. In fact, it was brilliant and my only possible move, to avoid being executed by forcing you to either lose, or try to win by attacking green whom you were completely ignoring. There was no coercion whatsoever, because I was not asking or suggesting you did anything in that game, ever. I was only informing you that I posted the accusation and that I thought you were cheaters. If anything, it was respectable that I posted the info and didnt do it behind your back, knowing that it might very well mean my death in the game, which as you stated, it did since it was the real reason you attacked me.
But since this accusation is beyond warranted, and tame at least, showing more than enough evidence to support my opinion and the accusation, many of which will believe summarily after looking a those games with you too, thats about the only outcome possible....except im sure you calling me a slanderer again. When you do though, just do me a favor. Quote where I lie or present something not true....just once.
