*Avatar* picture on wall posts [Implemented]

[AndyDufresne]

I like the idea. Since lack is the actual originator of the Wall phpBB Forum modification (he created it for CC, and then shared it with the world), he might be the only one who will do this update---since I am not sure another phpBB Mod Developer will come across this idea over the phpBB website. If it doesn't require much coding, I'd like to see it. But there are many other features and updates I desire before this if it does require more than simple coding.


--Andy

[grifftron]

I like the idea. Since lack is the actual originator of the Wall phpBB Forum modification (he created it for CC, and then shared it with the world), he might be the only one who will do this update---since I am not sure another phpBB Mod Developer will come across this idea over the phpBB website. If it doesn't require much coding, I'd like to see it. But there are many other features and updates I desire before this if it does require more than simple coding.


--Andy

Thanks for the support Andy... but like i was told before by the people over at phpBB, it is a simple 5 min job... but if lack created it, he would know best. See what he says...

-griff

[00iCon]

woah, i remember voting and can see the results, but it's prompting me to vote again. glitch?

[grifftron]

woah, i remember voting and can see the results, but it's prompting me to vote again. glitch?

nope i allowed people to change their votes.

-griff

[grifftron]

so... anything?

[TheForgivenOne]

Suggestions don't get done in a day.

Stickying this.

[grifftron]

Suggestions don't get done in a day.

Stickying this.

Thanks TFO

[jefjef]

If this gets instituted does it mean the system gets even slower?

[grifftron]

If this gets instituted does it mean the system gets even slower?

NO. Read the first post. I already talked with the head of what would be the phpBB "tech team" and he said it would not slow down anything, and that it would be a 5 min job. Wonder if lack could comment on this, he was the creator of "the wall" i was told.

-griff

[Darwins_Bane]

in some ways it could cause loading of the page to be slower, but I believe this is due to varying internet connections out there. I could be wrong, but that's my understanding anyways. If this were to be implemented and you were to not like how long it takes to load profile pages, you could probably just turn it off, as this suggestion is about having the option to turn it on.

[stahrgazer]

While he's reprogramming to place avatar pics, have him reprogram to have "check boxes" and "delete all checked" on wall posts like is in the inbox.

[Darwins_Bane]

While he's reprogramming to place avatar pics, have him reprogram to have "check boxes" and "delete all checked" on wall posts like is in the inbox.

I think it would be better if you posted this in the relevant topic here :http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 5&t=116709

[grifftron]

in some ways it could cause loading of the page to be slower, but I believe this is due to varying internet connections out there. I could be wrong, but that's my understanding anyways. If this were to be implemented and you were to not like how long it takes to load profile pages, you could probably just turn it off, as this suggestion is about having the option to turn it on.

That is correct about the option thing... not sure if your correct on the loading problem.

[Army of GOD]

It would lead to slower loading because there would be more information needed to be loaded, but it's pretty miniscule...like, how long does it take to load in the forum? It wouldn't be much longer on the walls...

[grifftron]

It would lead to slower loading because there would be more information needed to be loaded, but it's pretty miniscule...like, how long does it take to load in the forum? It wouldn't be much longer on the walls...

no no no.... this is not how it works man, i am not much of a comp nerd so i couldn't explain it to you, i wish i could find the post that phpBB sent me on this... they pretty much said it would only have to load the first time, after that the catche would grab it automatically and no loading would be needed.

[Darwins_Bane]

sort of...except when you have new wall posts?

[grifftron]

sort of...except when you have new wall posts?

which it would load once and then never again.

[Darwins_Bane]

submitted

[grifftron]

BEST IDEA OF ALL TIME!

[blakebowling]

Done!

Edit: Forgot to mention, thank Dako. He's the one who coded it.

[Victor Sullivan]

*sheds a tear of joy on such a momentous occasion*

-Sully

[grifftron]

Thanks Dako... <3