What a suprise
Moderator: Community Team
Since rankings are based on score, not number of games, I don't see this necesarilly being a problem on the scoreboard. If you're talking about rank, then yes, the premium members will be shooting up in rank, but rank doesn't really mean squat.vyvyan wrote:A humble question from a humble man.......
Are those who can affort this new membership and can therefore play amny more games destined to rule over those who can't in the Scoreboard?
Aye, having multiple prices is Good Business. I'd make it $2.50 though.Hey, is there a way you could to a month to month sponsorship, because I'm considering sponsoring, but I'm not too sure if I'm going to be playing 1 year down the line. I wouldn't mind pay a little more if that's a problem. Maybe have a choice between a yearly sponsorship for $20 and a monthly sponsorship for like $3 (over a course of a year that'd come out to $36)
In the military, your promotions are based on the time spend in the Forces(number of games played) & on your efficiency (score). The same basis is used on CC, so I really don't see why Lack should change anything about that...fishfleas wrote:Personally I think that Rank with the military ranking should be based on the score..... number of games played should be independant..... seems to make more sense that way to me...... I mean really would you rather have a guy who won all 5 wars he fought in lead your army or would you have someone that fought in 30 and lost all of them leading your army....Just a thought