Seriously though no-one said anyone "deserved" to die. That's a big leap to make.You agreed with MV's comments that an American soldier deserved to die for merely being in Afghanistan.
Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
- ksslemp
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Slemp, KY 41763 Pop. 'nough
- Contact:
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
- ksslemp
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Slemp, KY 41763 Pop. 'nough
- Contact:
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
But hey if it makes you feel special, do it.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
I guess I would definitely have to disagree with you on that one. It definitely does seem to be. But you probably wouldn't want to be seen agreeing with Woodruff the Marxist anyway.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
- Army of GOD
- Posts: 7185
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
Responding to a quote to yourself and double posting was invented in McGill.ksslemp wrote:But hey if it makes you feel special, do it.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
And I'm just showing an example. Too many people have done it in this thread.
mrswdk is a ho
- ViperOverLord
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
- Location: California
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
- ksslemp
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Slemp, KY 41763 Pop. 'nough
- Contact:
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
Woodruff wrote:I guess I would definitely have to disagree with you on that one. It definitely does seem to be. But you probably wouldn't want to be seen agreeing with Woodruff the Marxist anyway.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
Didnt know you were a Marxists but not surprised. That would explain the schoolteacher job as well.
Thank God these kids have parents who can explain to them that their teacher is FOS
- MeDeFe
- Posts: 7831
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
- Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
You suck at drawing conclusions regarding what things qualify as and what they don't qualify as.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
- Army of GOD
- Posts: 7185
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
He never agreed with what MViola said. He agreed that what MViola said was brave.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
Though, agreeing that something is brave and then saying that the same exact thing is not cowardly is kinda redundant. Still...
No one ever said troops deserve to die.
mrswdk is a ho
- The Bison King
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
- Location: the Mid-Westeros
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
Honestly it seems like everyone here has completely lost the point. Especially Ksslemp who has digressed to making fun of Woodruff's Avatar. VOP made a statement he couldn't back then disappeared, and no so will I. Time to get drunk.
- ksslemp
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Slemp, KY 41763 Pop. 'nough
- Contact:
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
I'd have agree.MeDeFe wrote:You suck at drawing conclusions regarding what things qualify as and what they don't qualify as.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
Are you seriously retarded? And I ask that question in entire seriousness, because it's really the only explanation I can see for you to say such a thing.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
I did not IN ANY WAY support his claim that men and women in uniform deserve to get killed for being in Afghanistan, and you're really going to have to correlate exactly how you believe that's what my statement means...please start now. And be specific.
And I certainly cannot possibly see how you can see my statement as holding the men and women in uniform in contempt, so please explain that as well, again being specific.
In addition to that, I stated that mviola was not cowardly, which it certainly wasn't. How can speaking out about something in an unpopular manner POSSIBLY be cowardly? That's like the definition of not being cowardly.
Perhaps you should read ALL OF MY STATEMENTS in this thread prior to that one and see how you still feel about it, you fucking idiot.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
- ViperOverLord
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
- Location: California
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
How about a little more specificity.MeDeFe wrote:You suck at drawing conclusions regarding what things qualify as and what they don't qualify as.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
I'm not even remotely Marxist...that's simply yet ANOTHER claim that ViperOverLord made about me while refusing to support it with any actual statements of mine. It's his typical methodology here.ksslemp wrote:Didnt know you were a Marxists but not surprised.Woodruff wrote:I guess I would definitely have to disagree with you on that one. It definitely does seem to be. But you probably wouldn't want to be seen agreeing with Woodruff the Marxist anyway.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
You don't really have a strong understanding of the subject I teach, do you?ksslemp wrote:Thank God these kids have parents who can explain to them that their teacher is FOS
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
- Georgerx7di
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
First time I've ever seen woody show emotion.Woodruff wrote:QUOTE ME, MOTHERFUCKER. WHERE DID I SAY THAT? AS I ASKED...BE FUCKING SPECIFIC, COWARD. In fact, I have absolutely disagreed with most of mviola's statements...not that I think you can actually read.ViperOverLord wrote:That's pretty simple. You agreed with MV's comments that an American soldier deserved to die for merely being in Afghanistan.Woodruff wrote:
Contempt? WHERE have I shown ANY contempt for the men and women currently protecting me, jackass? Where? Let's be specific. And maybe you won't run from this one like the fucking coward YOU are, as you have in the past. I definitely have contempt for you, though. You disgust me.
No, I've been quite contemptuous of sanctimonious assholes who believe in waving the flag and talking out of their asses.ViperOverLord wrote:Not only that you have been quite contemptuous against the people supporting the troops if you want to circle the landing pad that way.
- ksslemp
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Slemp, KY 41763 Pop. 'nough
- Contact:
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
Isn't the mere site of his avatar FUN? Spock is great and to prove it.The Bison King wrote:Honestly it seems like everyone here has completely lost the point. Especially Ksslemp who has digressed to making fun of Woodruff's Avatar. VOP made a statement he couldn't back then disappeared, and no so will I. Time to get drunk.
Check this out on Ebay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... K:MESOX:IT
- Army of GOD
- Posts: 7185
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
I believe his "specificity" was in reference to pretty much everything you stated there.ViperOverLord wrote:How about a little more specificity.MeDeFe wrote:You suck at drawing conclusions regarding what things qualify as and what they don't qualify as.ViperOverLord wrote:That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote: I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
- ViperOverLord
- Posts: 2497
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
- Location: California
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
Look dude. If you cannot say that it is a cowardly thing to say that the men and women deserved to die for being in Afghanistan then that is contempt. Just because you are not the one that said it or you don't explicitly agree with it does not let you off the hook regarding contempt. And as I said, if you want to take the long way around the barn then just look at how you are flaming against those that support the troops and supporting those that made such insane claims against the troops.Woodruff wrote:Are you seriously retarded? And I ask that question in entire seriousness, because it's really the only explanation I can see for you to say such a thing.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
I did not IN ANY WAY support his claim that men and women in uniform deserve to get killed for being in Afghanistan, and you're really going to have to correlate exactly how you believe that's what my statement means...please start now. And be specific.
And I certainly cannot possibly see how you can see my statement as holding the men and women in uniform in contempt, so please explain that as well, again being specific.
In addition to that, I stated that mviola was not cowardly, which it certainly wasn't. How can speaking out about something in an unpopular manner POSSIBLY be cowardly? That's like the definition of not being cowardly.
Perhaps you should read ALL OF MY STATEMENTS in this thread prior to that one and see how you still feel about it, you fucking idiot.
Last edited by ViperOverLord on Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
I get a little (ok, not a little) pissed off when someone attempts to portray me as not supporting our military personnel. It's a subject that is extremely near and dear to my heart.Georgerx7di wrote:First time I've ever seen woody show emotion.Woodruff wrote:QUOTE ME, MOTHERFUCKER. WHERE DID I SAY THAT? AS I ASKED...BE FUCKING SPECIFIC, COWARD. In fact, I have absolutely disagreed with most of mviola's statements...not that I think you can actually read.ViperOverLord wrote:That's pretty simple. You agreed with MV's comments that an American soldier deserved to die for merely being in Afghanistan.Woodruff wrote:
Contempt? WHERE have I shown ANY contempt for the men and women currently protecting me, jackass? Where? Let's be specific. And maybe you won't run from this one like the fucking coward YOU are, as you have in the past. I definitely have contempt for you, though. You disgust me.
No, I've been quite contemptuous of sanctimonious assholes who believe in waving the flag and talking out of their asses.ViperOverLord wrote:Not only that you have been quite contemptuous against the people supporting the troops if you want to circle the landing pad that way.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
You gotta read my posts in Spock's VOICE though...definitely adds to the experience. I promise!ksslemp wrote: Isn't the mere site of his avatar FUN?
(Though that's a bit more difficult with some of my more emotional ones in this thread...<grin>)
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
- ksslemp
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 11:30 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Slemp, KY 41763 Pop. 'nough
- Contact:
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
I'm not even remotely Marxist...that's simply yet ANOTHER claim that ViperOverLord made about me while refusing to support it with any actual statements of mine. It's his typical methodology here.ksslemp wrote:Didnt know you were a Marxists but not surprised.Woodruff wrote:I guess I would definitely have to disagree with you on that one. It definitely does seem to be. But you probably wouldn't want to be seen agreeing with Woodruff the Marxist anyway.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
You're the one who claimed to be, Just responding to your statement.
You don't really have a strong understanding of the subject I teach, do you?[/quote]ksslemp wrote:Thank God these kids have parents who can explain to them that their teacher is FOS
And no, i don't know what subject you teach. But if you said you were a Marxist then i would assume whatever it was would be taught from that viewpoint.
- Georgerx7di
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
Wait, Ksslemp is a marxist. I always had a feeling about that guy. I remember when he was saying that stuff about stalin, how great he was. I should have figured it out then.
Last edited by Georgerx7di on Tue Aug 24, 2010 7:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Gamers Can "Play" as Taliban
HE DIDN'T FUCKING SAY THAT, YOU RETARD...CAN YOU NOT FUCKING READ? QUOTE HIM - NOW.ViperOverLord wrote:Look dude. If you cannot say that it is a cowardly thing to say that the men and women deserved to die for being in Afghanistan then that is contempt.Woodruff wrote: Perhaps you should read ALL OF MY STATEMENTS in this thread prior to that one and see how you still feel about it, you fucking idiot.
You really need to learn how to STOP MAKING SHIT UP. I'd think you'd fucking have figured this out by now, but you're nothing but a fucking liar and you need to stop doing it.ViperOverLord wrote:Just because you are not the one that said it or you don't explicitly agree with it does not let you off the hook regarding contempt. And as I said, if you want to take the long way around the barn then just look at how you are flaming against those that support the troops and supporting those that made such insane claims against the troops.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.

