mandalorian2298 wrote:mandalorian2298 wrote:This time I'll skip the FOSing and go straight to vote.
I
vote unit_2. First he backed up everywhere's No lynch on the start of game one. From then on he kept throwing votes around without explanation. He
feels like a newbie mafia to me wich would explain the lynches: he lynched either Narc or unriggable to throw suspicion on the other guy, but it failed (probably due to an equaly newbish serial killer/second mafia

).
Wisse wrote:feeling mafia make you typ things wrong you know?
I thought that was what he ment by 'feeling mafia' and that by posting wrong he ment me typing 'game one' instead of 'day 1'.
Wait wait wait........ So your point for voting for Unit_2 is because you think he is a noob and he slipped up on his role play?
Try this on for size and maybe consider a more plausible plot such as: He has a sense of humor.
I know I know, it sounds crazy but maybe, just maybe, he made a typo (being human and all). Im more concerned about you Mandalorian than I am Unit_2. But just because your argument is weak, doesnt mean Im going to jump to conclusions like somebody I know.......
So with that said, Im going to
vote for red bull because of this key post:
red bull wrote:no wait i know what happened now !!!!!!!!!! anrak killed unbrige and the mafia killed anark......... atleast that makes the most sence beacuse anark was aruging with unbrige so he killed him beacuse he was mad and the mafia then killed anark just to kill

NOW unit2 where does that come from ??????????

why vote me ??
Why the need to try and spin a story and make something apear to be when there is no evidence of it. I Think Red bull got pretty touchy after being voted for and felt the need to try and blend into into the non-mafia ranks.
All I ask is that you guys dont jump on a band wagon so easily especially without any proof which is what I consider our current band wagon now.