A more democratic sports trivia thread [rules page one]

by **Incandenza** on Fri Mar 02, 2007 11:45 pm

adam dunn, damn.... right on the tip of my brain. I knew it was recent... Nice one, DS.

by **perchorin** on Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:53 am

CRAIG BIGGIO!!!!!
and if it isn't him it should be

by **DIRESTRAITS** on Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:10 pm

perchorin wrote:CRAIG BIGGIO!!!!!
and if it isn't him it should be

Nope. Not even close

by **P Gizzle** on Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:57 pm

i dunno, but who's gonna beat UCLA in a couple minutes?

by **DIRESTRAITS** on Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:59 pm

P Gizzle wrote:i dunno, but who's gonna beat UCLA in a couple minutes?

No one

by **P Gizzle** on Sat Mar 03, 2007 4:00 pm

check the score bud....

HUSKIES FTW!!!

by **DIRESTRAITS** on Sat Mar 03, 2007 4:02 pm

P Gizzle wrote:check the score bud....

HUSKIES FTW!!!

Shit, they are. That's ridiculous. Huskies still won't go to the NCAAs.

by **P Gizzle** on Sat Mar 03, 2007 4:06 pm

DIRESTRAITS wrote:
P Gizzle wrote:check the score bud....

HUSKIES FTW!!!

Shit, they are. That's ridiculous. Huskies still won't go to the NCAAs.

because we don't get no respect....two top 25 wins IN A ROW, and nobody cares.....we beat you guys as well, no respect.....c'mon, we have young guys cut us a LITTLE SLACK....maybe we'll go to the NITs... :roll:

by **DIRESTRAITS** on Sat Mar 03, 2007 4:08 pm

P Gizzle wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:
P Gizzle wrote:check the score bud....

HUSKIES FTW!!!

Shit, they are. That's ridiculous. Huskies still won't go to the NCAAs.

because we don't get no respect....two top 25 wins IN A ROW, and nobody cares.....we beat you guys as well, no respect.....c'mon, we have young guys cut us a LITTLE SLACK....maybe we'll go to the NITs...

Should be in the nit, but the Oregon win has a huge asterisk without Aaron Brooks, and UCLA wasn't even trying today, unlike when the Ducks beat them

by **P Gizzle** on Sat Mar 03, 2007 4:11 pm

DIRESTRAITS wrote:
P Gizzle wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:
P Gizzle wrote:check the score bud....

HUSKIES FTW!!!

Shit, they are. That's ridiculous. Huskies still won't go to the NCAAs.

because we don't get no respect....two top 25 wins IN A ROW, and nobody cares.....we beat you guys as well, no respect.....c'mon, we have young guys cut us a LITTLE SLACK....maybe we'll go to the NITs...

Should be in the nit, but the Oregon win has a huge asterisk without Aaron Brooks, and UCLA wasn't even trying today, unlike when the Ducks beat them

but none of that matters......

does anyone care that the Seahawks were hurt last year? no, why, cuz one player will never make or break a team...bottom line....and to say a team wasn't trying when you weren't even watching the game is absurd...

by **Incandenza** on Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:52 pm

I think we might need a hint, DS.

by **perchorin** on Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:46 pm

Incandenza wrote:I think we might need a hint, DS.

I'd like a hint, but until then I'll go with Ty Cobb as my next guess...

by **Incandenza** on Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:37 pm

Bumpity, definitely need a hint from direstraits...

by **DIRESTRAITS** on Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:46 pm

Ok, He played for The Red Sox in 1930

P.S., if any of you have the book Made to Be Broken about Sports records, it's in there

by **Incandenza** on Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:31 pm

DIRESTRAITS wrote:Ok, He played for The Red Sox in 1930

P.S., if any of you have the book Made to Be Broken about Sports records, it's in there

Then I'll guess jimmy foxx (even tho I barely know anything about the guy)... no clue how many he might have hit... 75?

by **DIRESTRAITS** on Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:38 pm

Nope. Should I just give it up?

by **P Gizzle** on Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:23 pm

wait...........uh.....i know this.......man, i can't think of his name!!! who is it?

by **Incandenza** on Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:33 pm

DIRESTRAITS wrote:Nope. Should I just give it up?

you might as well... I looked it up, and someone would have to be pretty damn good to know the answer.... (I've never heard of the guy)

by **DIRESTRAITS** on Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:39 pm

ok, the answer was Earl Webb, who hit 67 doubles in 1930 with the Boston Red Sox.

New Question: Who has the most all time At Bats in MLB History

by **Incandenza** on Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:08 pm

DIRESTRAITS wrote:ok, the answer was Earl Webb, who hit 67 doubles in 1930 with the Boston Red Sox.

New Question: Who has the most all time At Bats in MLB History

I'll go with Pete Rose.

by **DIRESTRAITS** on Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:11 pm

Incandenza wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:ok, the answer was Earl Webb, who hit 67 doubles in 1930 with the Boston Red Sox.

New Question: Who has the most all time At Bats in MLB History

I'll go with Pete Rose.

Correct! You're up

by **Incandenza** on Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:06 pm

OOOOOkay....

Here's a quickie one that should put a smile on your respective faces:

Which NBA player, when asked why he attempted so many three-point shots, replied, "Because there are no fours"?

by **CBlake** on Sun Mar 04, 2007 11:13 pm

Incandenza wrote:OOOOOkay....

Here's a quickie one that should put a smile on your respective faces:

Which NBA player, when asked why he attempted so many three-point shots, replied, "Because there are no fours"?

Reggie Miller

by **Incandenza** on Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:06 am

CBlake wrote:
Incandenza wrote:OOOOOkay....

Here's a quickie one that should put a smile on your respective faces:

Which NBA player, when asked why he attempted so many three-point shots, replied, "Because there are no fours"?

Reggie Miller

Nope. Please try again.

by **P Gizzle** on Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:13 am

Incandenza wrote:
CBlake wrote:
Incandenza wrote:OOOOOkay....

Here's a quickie one that should put a smile on your respective faces:

Which NBA player, when asked why he attempted so many three-point shots, replied, "Because there are no fours"?

Reggie Miller

Nope. Please try again.

maybe Gilbert Arenas?

A more democratic sports trivia thread [rules page one]

Who is online