WWII Operation Iwo Jima [Quenched]

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 5:45 am

Perchorin you right

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 6:06 am

Okay, I'll support this map, because it's turning out fine. Except, the grid lines kind of annoy me and get in the way, maybe you should put Iwo Jima infront of those lines and make it just the background and not infront of Iwo Jima.

Also, you need to spell things correctly. Like 'tunels' and 'filds', Tunnels. Fields. Just to make more sense.

Coming along nicely, Qwert.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:26 am

Skitles my work in these map stand, becouse i waith vote result,

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 4:23 pm

new upload coming soon

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:36 pm

OK here a new update of WW2 IWO JIMA STRATEGIC MILITARY MAP.

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:39 pm

Oooh... the Yes's have pulled ahead...

Think its gonna be a photo finish.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:45 pm

strange 50%-49% where 1% go

Guiscard · Post by **Guiscard** » Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:51 pm

spooky

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 2:33 am

qwert wrote:Skitles my work in these map stand, becouse i waith vote result,

What?

And I was telling you how to spell tunnels and fields correctly. Not my fault you're so stubborn.

Anyway.
The map is looking good, and the lines are good now. I like the colours.

Keep going on this!

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:52 am

Skittles! wrote
And I was telling you how to spell tunnels and fields correctly. Not my fault you're so stubborn

Ups, soory i forgot, english its not good, but no wory in next update i will change these

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 1:41 pm

Here new update, and i change tunnels and fields(language mistake)

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:15 pm

so what you think guys

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:22 pm

I would like to know what the machine guns do, and the fox holes.

Enigma · Post by **Enigma** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:37 pm

i like the graphics, but dont understand the gameplay from just looking at the map. and judging from ur attitude on ur other maps... perhaps theres no point in continuing. *shrugs* but i havent voted either way yet.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:44 pm

Skitles its defens sumbol, present defens line and you can not cross these barier

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:46 pm

Enigma
i like the graphics, but dont understand the gameplay from just looking at the map. and judging from ur attitude on ur other maps... perhaps theres no point in continuing. *shrugs* but i havent voted either way yet.

What you dont understand?

KEYOGI · Post by **KEYOGI** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:11 pm

qwert wrote:so what you think guys

Maybe you should wait more than 5 hours for a response. People will have input when they have something to say.

The map still has no interest for me. The only thing I can recommend is drawing your own compass and objects rather than copying them from somewhere else. But don't worry, I'm not going to bother you with suggesting any further changes.

Enigma · Post by **Enigma** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:12 pm

qwert wrote:
Enigma
i like the graphics, but dont understand the gameplay from just looking at the map. and judging from ur attitude on ur other maps... perhaps theres no point in continuing. *shrugs* but i havent voted either way yet.

What you dont understand?

well,
-bonuses
-the difference between anti-tank barriers and anti-tank trenches
-the purposes of machine guns, foxholes, and covered artillery--if all of these things do the same then i would suggest that this is mentioned (like say "barriers:" in the legend) or that you just use 1 symbol
-also not sure bout the setup of the territories in 4th, 5th, A, and B. they each only have 2 borders. not much variety.

but i love the graph paper/ hand drawn graphics.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 7:24 pm

Keyogy you very smart you know these,The only thing I can recommend is drawing your own compass and objects rather than copying them from somewhere else.. Why you dont show me how to draw Compass,Chronogram, diverse and wooden meter to look real, i realy want to see these.

Enigma reply
-I dont put bonuses its to erly for these
-i put these diferent barier to look interest but if people want to see only 1 barier i can change
-4th have 4 borders,5th have 4 borders,A have 4 borders, B have 3 borders you dont count good

Enigma · Post by **Enigma** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:41 pm

qwert wrote:-4th have 4 borders,5th have 4 borders,A have 4 borders, B have 3 borders you dont count good

uhh- i said borders. not attack routes. am i just missing sumthing? for example, green has 2 borders: 4th M D and Yellow 1

which brings up another point- the names dont make any sense at all.

and btw- keyogi is amazing at drawing w/ a mouse

go look at his mountains in the middle east revamp.

4get it qwert, ur attitude hasnt changed.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:44 pm

That i mean atack route(i dont count defese barier)All have 4 atack route

hulmey · Post by **hulmey** » Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:21 pm

very nice map qwert...You have got to be one of the top map makers on this site!!!!!

This map looks very authentic and real. Good work and i must say that i love following these threads.....At least they are never quiet

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:53 am

Thanks hulmey, i try to create map to look like real map of Atack to Iwo jima

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 3:11 pm

Well my map its in Developmental Atlas and i think that vote pool show that i have support to continue work in these map. Thanks for all who give me support.

Qwert · Post by **Qwert** » Sat Mar 03, 2007 6:03 pm

here new update, i change defense bariers and now 1 sumbol present these, and put bonuses.