Why Did The Chicken Cross The Road?

[hecter]

Did it even cross the road at all?
http://www.infiltec.com/j-chick2.htm

[yrral]

To prove to the possum it could actually be done!

[jonesthecurl]

jonesthecurl: For some fowl purpose.

[jiminski]

because a jay-walker from Missouri had his cock stuck in it?

[strike wolf]

Hecter owed it money on the other side.

[vodean]

the grass was greener on the other side

[ser stiefel]

In order to foster the eternal question. Wicked, wicked chicken!

[Army of GOD]

Because it's what all the "cook kids" were doing.

[jonesthecurl]

jonesthecurl(again):

There once was a rooster called Pluck
Who gave an appreciative cluck
at a lovely young hen
'cross the road and so then
he crossed over to get a good
look at her because he really found her quite attractive.

[daddy1gringo]

...because he wanted to be poultry in motion.

[pimpdave]

According to Fred Durst, he did it all for the nookie.

[pearljamrox2]

the bigger question is, why can't this harmless little bird go for a little stroll without you or someone else question is fucking motivation?

[jonesthecurl]

Because he's wearing a turban.

[DAZMCFC]

...because there was a Veggie restaraunt on the other side.

[ser stiefel]

because

[Gypsys Kiss]

I asked her, and she said it was none of my fucking business.....

[ser stiefel]

The chicken did not cross the road.

For motion to be occurring, an object must change the position which it occupies. In any one instant of time, for the chicken to be moving it must either move to where it is, or it must move to where it is not. However, it cannot move to where it is not, because this is a single instant, and it cannot move to where it is because it is already there. In other words, in any instant of time there is no motion occurring, because an instant is a snapshot. Therefore, if it cannot move in a single instant it cannot move in any instant, making any motion impossible.

[jonesthecurl]

The chicken did not cross the road.

For motion to be occurring, an object must change the position which it occupies. In any one instant of time, for the chicken to be moving it must either move to where it is, or it must move to where it is not. However, it cannot move to where it is not, because this is a single instant, and it cannot move to where it is because it is already there. In other words, in any instant of time there is no motion occurring, because an instant is a snapshot. Therefore, if it cannot move in a single instant it cannot move in any instant, making any motion impossible.

Bugger. And I was just gonna go down the pub.

[vodean]

The chicken did not cross the road.

For motion to be occurring, an object must change the position which it occupies. In any one instant of time, for the chicken to be moving it must either move to where it is, or it must move to where it is not. However, it cannot move to where it is not, because this is a single instant, and it cannot move to where it is because it is already there. In other words, in any instant of time there is no motion occurring, because an instant is a snapshot. Therefore, if it cannot move in a single instant it cannot move in any instant, making any motion impossible.

but you typed that. fallacy fail

[hecter]

The chicken did not cross the road.

For motion to be occurring, an object must change the position which it occupies. In any one instant of time, for the chicken to be moving it must either move to where it is, or it must move to where it is not. However, it cannot move to where it is not, because this is a single instant, and it cannot move to where it is because it is already there. In other words, in any instant of time there is no motion occurring, because an instant is a snapshot. Therefore, if it cannot move in a single instant it cannot move in any instant, making any motion impossible.

The definition of motion is movement over time. So, in order for there to be motion, two of those snapshots must be compared.