Withdrawn [Closed]

ryanalexander · Post by **ryanalexander** » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:30 pm

Accused:

Withdrawn
Withdrawn

The accused are suspected of: Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

[game]Withdrawn[/game]

Comments: Withdrawn

God Emperor Q · Post by **God Emperor Q** » Tue Jan 19, 2010 7:59 pm

If it is done where all players can see it, then it is not secret diplomacy. I think that ClapMan should be advised to use game chat, but it looks like he did already.

Snowgun · Post by **Snowgun** » Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:04 pm

God Emperor Q wrote:If it is done where all players can see it, then it is not secret diplomacy. I think that ClapMan should be advised to use game chat, but it looks like he did already.

This isn't true. The conversation should always be in game chat. It isn't the other player's responsibility to be checking everyone's wall, signing on to live chat, ect.

Rule #2: No secret diplomacy

Any form of diplomatic discussion between opponents must be posted in the game chat in English or in a language that all opponents understand.

Snowgun · Post by **Snowgun** » Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:09 pm

You made this report at 7:30, then told him to use game chat at 9:30 ish, in which case he started using it.

Could have told him first, and saved a C&a report... but what if you wouldn't have caught him? He is still breaking the rules whether caught or not.

I dont' know... Light noodle lashing?

ryanalexander · Post by **ryanalexander** » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:28 pm

Withdrawn

Snowgun · Post by **Snowgun** » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:46 pm

ryanalexander wrote:He has already negatively impacted the game, as clearly the strategy of Chelslife went from a "stocking" to an attacking shared borders post-comment. The integrity of this game has been compromised by using a wall as a communication point. If it had been posted in "Game Chat" I may have had the opportunity to offer a truce to Chelslife, or make a case for an alternate strategy. I'd prefer it if the game itself was nuked to avoid any further controversy, or frustration on the part of any involved party.

well they ain't gonna nuke the game. but you have a point. probably a warning..

king sam · Post by **king sam** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:51 pm

well we didnt catch this in time and the OP withdrew the accusation.

If you feel there is a violation in this case and want to report it please do so in a new thread or via an E-Ticket.

Closed

KS

ryanalexander · Post by **ryanalexander** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:57 pm

Clearly there was some secret diplomacy involved in this case, as noted in previous posts, but I withdrew the complaint my preference was to whoop the cheater in the game, which I did.