Tess Tickles: Rating abuse [warned/busted]

by **alster** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:29 am

Accused:

Tess Tickles

The accused are suspected of:

Other: Rating abuse (as defined by guidelines/previous C&A decisions).

Game number(s):

n/a

Comments:
I don't think this needs any particular comments, please just see the account's history of given ratings.

by **vodean** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 8:35 am

looks like open and shut. What about motive?

by **Tess Tickles** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:16 am

If I had given everyone five stars would this also be considered abuse?

by **jefjef** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:24 am

Tess Tickles wrote:If I had given everyone five stars would this also be considered abuse?

This is ABUSE. No if's ands or but's. Everyone you play is a cheat? Have a shitty attitude? Has 1 star strategy? Look at the tags you gave too.

Enjoy the warning headed your way and If you continue your abuse CC will disallow you to rate.

by **Tess Tickles** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:25 am

In my OPINION yes they were.

by **karelpietertje** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:26 am

Awesome username 8-[

by **jefjef** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:28 am

Tess Tickles wrote:In my OPINION yes they were.

In your opinion Ukuki was "Quick, Slow, Deadbeat, Friendly"

Quick AND slow? Friendly deadbeat?

Alstergren was a bad teammate? He wasn't YOUR teammate.

Niblets was "Talkative, Silent, Trustworthy, Backstabber"

Talkative and silent. Trustworthy AND a back stabber.

You can not defend this ABUSE.

by **Tess Tickles** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:29 am

Which happens to be YOUR opinion of them. I happened to think otherwise. Sorry if we don't agree on everything, babe.

by **the.killing.44** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:35 am

Tess Tickles wrote:Which happens to be YOUR opinion of them. I happened to think otherwise. Sorry if we don't agree on everything, babe.

Haha. YOUR opinion is that they were quick and slow.

by **Tess Tickles** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 11:36 am

Yes, you can start out quick and then go slow. Yes, that is my opinion.

by **max is gr8** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:01 pm

Has anyone considered that like many on the site tess only rates when she feels a person deserves a poor rating. Many only rate when they feel they deserve a good rating so what is different here?

by **jefjef** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:03 pm

max is gr8 wrote:Has anyone considered that like many on the site tess only rates when she feels a person deserves a poor rating. Many only rate when they feel they deserve a good rating so what is different here?

Look at the ratings tags before you consider that this is tess's honest opinion.

by **the.killing.44** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:04 pm

max is gr8 wrote:Has anyone considered that like many on the site tess only rates when she feels a person deserves a poor rating. Many only rate when they feel they deserve a good rating so what is different here?

I do that mostly, too. But just look at the ratings. A backstabber on the other team of a 2v2? when the other team won?

by **max is gr8** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:05 pm

Doesn't that show a somewhat twisted view of the world? Backstabbing can only apply if they attacked their own team member

by **the.killing.44** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 2:07 pm

max is gr8 wrote:Doesn't that show a somewhat twisted view of the world?

what?

by **vodean** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:07 pm

Tess Tickles wrote:Yes, you can start out quick and then go slow. Yes, that is my opinion.

You wouldn't tag them both at the same time. Only 1 star ratings? no one does that. you're defense would not hold up in court.

by **Tess Tickles** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 3:10 pm

Probably because courts could care less about this. As you can see I did tag them both at the same time.

by **TheForgivenOne** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:49 pm

Explain to me how JOHNNYROCKET24 deserved a "Complainer" Tag when he didn't say one thing in the chats.
Same to mr.papageorgio

And how do these Major's deserve 1 for Gameplay, yet they beat you, and are a FAR better rank then you?

And one last question, do you even know what Deadbeat means? It means that when you are about to lose, you don't play anymore turns. So how do players that BEAT you, deserve a Deadbeat tag?

by **Tess Tickles** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 7:53 pm

He didn't actually have to say anything. It was all in the tone of his gameplay. It had complainer written all over it. I just happen to be very sensitive to these things. I can pick up on them.

by **TheForgivenOne** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 8:21 pm

Tess Tickles wrote:He didn't actually have to say anything. It was all in the tone of his gameplay. It had complainer written all over it. I just happen to be very sensitive to these things. I can pick up on them.

That only answered one of my questions. And a very....whats the word i'm looking for? Terrible response.

So how did the Major's you verse deserve a 1 for Gameplay? Yet they beat you. And how did Any of those players that beat you deserve a Deadbeat tag?

by **Tess Tickles** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 8:23 pm

They dead beat me. So I found it an appropriate tag.

by **wolfpack0530** on Fri Dec 04, 2009 8:34 pm

Tess, you sarcasm is not being wasted!! I find your responses to be hilarious. you surely do enjoy the devil's advocate role dont you!! Of course, most of those posting in this thread are being completely serious, and you are enjoying every second of it arent you!!

While i find your rating's abuse to be atrocious, i think that you are just doing it to stir the pot, and you are getting all the attention you want from it. I hope the fun you are having is worth it, because a very mild punishment is coming your way. I hope you can handle it!!