reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
ronsizzle
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:30 pm
Gender: Male

reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by ronsizzle »

ronc8649

i have been on here for close to three years. i have already served my month long suspension. i think the next step is 6 months. it is either that or out of the door. i realize i have mad mistakes on cc when it comes to flaming other members.

my heart is good, and just. is there some sort of way to work off the level i am at. can i somehow get back to square 1? can i pay 25 dollars to get back? this isnt going to encourage flaming or anything like that. but it will make me feel as if im not walking on eggshells constantly.

i know others feel the way i do. i have helped countless people on cc with finding add ons/plug ins, and other areas as well.

there are a bunch of us since flame wars was deleted that were mad, and felt betrayed. that is what triggered most of the anger from the fellows in fw.

this is a serious thread! please take it as that.


thanks
ron
User avatar
jefjef
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by jefjef »

Belongs in SUGGS..... Posting in wrong forum isn't gonna help......

Perhaps a probation like solution could be available. Like a year after any disciplinary action without any more could be credited. An earned credit per say.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
#1_stunna
Posts: 1126
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:31 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Muleshoe

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by #1_stunna »

I <3 ron, i dont care what anybody says about you i still <3 you
User avatar
lord voldemort
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Gender: Male
Location: Launceston, Australia
Contact:

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by lord voldemort »

Moving this over to suggs and bugs. Stunna stay on topic.
As for the suggestion.....I always wondered why people who didn't show significant change over a period of time had their next level reduced.
Image
User avatar
#1_stunna
Posts: 1126
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:31 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Muleshoe

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by #1_stunna »

sorry lovo

ronc i agree with you, but maybe limit your activity in the forums

idk, just suggestion since this is the suggestions and bugs reports
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3075
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by PLAYER57832 »

There is a whole thread on this --something like "6 month ban instead of perma ban". Was active for a few weeks. I would look for it, but its time for me to head out.

Do a search, though and you should find it.

The short answer was that most people wanted some kind of "rollback", but admin said it would be too difficult to implement.
Last edited by PLAYER57832 on Thu Oct 08, 2009 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ronsizzle
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by ronsizzle »

#1_stunna wrote:sorry lovo

ronc i agree with you, but maybe limit your activity in the forums

idk, just suggestion since this is the suggestions and bugs reports

lord voldemort, thank you. i have often wondered that too.

i have never doubted the love that THE NUMBA ONE STUNNA has for me though.
Last edited by ronsizzle on Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
#1_stunna
Posts: 1126
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:31 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Muleshoe

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by #1_stunna »

ronc8649 wrote:
#1_stunna wrote:sorry lovo

ronc i agree with you, but maybe limit your activity in the forums

idk, just suggestion since this is the suggestions and bugs reports

lord voldemort, thank you. i have often wondered that too.

i have never doubted the love that 44 has for me though.
44? :-s

me confused
ronsizzle
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by ronsizzle »

PLAYER57832 wrote:There is a whole thread on this --something like "6 month ban instead of perma ban". Was active for a few weeks. I would look for it, but its time for me to head out.

Do a search, though and you should find it.

The short answer was that most people wanted some kind of "rollback", but admin said it would be too difficult to implement.

that was something different player57832.

sometimes, things seem to be the same. but truly not.

i was drunk earlier, then i took a couple pills, now i smoked a little herb.

i thought they were all the same buzz. but now since having this convo with you, i realize i feel entirely different with each substance i abuse. i dont want a six month ban instead of perma ban. i do think some people needed to be banned 4 life. not everyone of course. but some.

but i also think that some people deserve a break. and maybe probation.

this entire new set of "community guidelines" kind of fucked the community.

damnit, i am sick of going back and fixing my errors with spelling, and the uncoordinated fingers, and opposable thumbs. i think i spelled that wrong. not cuz i am wasted. but cuz i dont quite know how to spell it.

i will finish this tomorrow when my left hand is typing in synchronization with my right hand.

if this needs mod edited, then by all means, please.

but i have worked too long on this not to post it.
User avatar
jefjef
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by jefjef »

Ronc your are a god %*&* *((&)().

This site is by far &*&()8() with you on it.

If you can post 2000 more times without a %*(&^ then I think the ladder should have a step added to it. And every 2000 times after that then another rung.

I completely agree with this sugg.

The buzzes are different.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
ronsizzle
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by ronsizzle »

jefjef wrote:Ronc your are a god %*&* *((&)().

This site is by far &*&()8() with you on it.

If you can post 2000 more times without a %*(&^ then I think the ladder should have a step added to it. And every 2000 times after that then another rung.

I completely agree with this sugg.

The buzzes are different.

what does this all mean? i left my captain crunch decoder ring in the car. when i have it on me, i never need it, but when i need it, i dont have it.

does that make sense? if it doesnt? could someone with my pword touch this up for me, or a mod edit please to make me look more intelligent.

thanks
ron
User avatar
the.killing.44
Posts: 4724
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes
Contact:

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by the.killing.44 »

Epic.
ronsizzle
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: reducing bans, and the ladder of the guidelines

Post by ronsizzle »

the.killing.44 wrote:Epic.

44! you are like georgia.

you are always on my mind.
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”