Rule change
Moderator: Community Team
- Georgerx7di
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm
- Gender: Male
Rule change
I suggest that the rule on deadbeating be changed to allow players to intentionally deadbeat team games if it is in an effort to help their team win. There is nothing cheap about this. If it were allowed then both teams would have the option to use it. A tactic is not cheap or unfair if both teams have an equal chance to employ that tactic.
This would give one more option to players. The objective of game play should be to give the maxim amount of options to players so that they can use their skills to defeat their opponent. The more options open to players, the more the game is decided by skill, and the less it is decided by dice and drop.
Final comment. Saying that this is unfair is akin to saying that taking a bonus is unfair. Both players can play for the bonus. Who makes the better choices, wins more often. This just gives players one more choice.
I don't want to belabor this point, but before people post in return that this is unfair, they should consider what unfair means. If both players have the option to do something, then it is, by definition, fair.
Final, final comment. This would affect a limited number of maps, and would not totally change the game. Also, for those who think it won't work, then they should support this rule change and reap the benefits of bad play from those of us who try it out (if the rule is changed).
This would give one more option to players. The objective of game play should be to give the maxim amount of options to players so that they can use their skills to defeat their opponent. The more options open to players, the more the game is decided by skill, and the less it is decided by dice and drop.
Final comment. Saying that this is unfair is akin to saying that taking a bonus is unfair. Both players can play for the bonus. Who makes the better choices, wins more often. This just gives players one more choice.
I don't want to belabor this point, but before people post in return that this is unfair, they should consider what unfair means. If both players have the option to do something, then it is, by definition, fair.
Final, final comment. This would affect a limited number of maps, and would not totally change the game. Also, for those who think it won't work, then they should support this rule change and reap the benefits of bad play from those of us who try it out (if the rule is changed).
Re: Rule change
i think this is an awful idea.
sorry.
sorry.
- haggispittjr
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:25 pm
- Location: montreal, quebec, canada
Re: Rule change
i dont see whats stopping you from doing that now.
- Georgerx7di
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Rule change
It's against the ruleshaggispittjr wrote:i dont see whats stopping you from doing that now.
- haggispittjr
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:25 pm
- Location: montreal, quebec, canada
Re: Rule change
there might be arguements that stem from that, kind of a "i meant to deadbeat thing", iunno. not to mention people who do it offton will have there % of turns taken decrease rapidly. im not for this idea, less change the better in this case i think.
- AndyDufresne
- Posts: 24919
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
- Contact:
Re: Rule change
Deliberately delaying games I don't think is something we can to encourage.
--Andy
--Andy
- Georgerx7di
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Rule change
If we're talking about fake time games, people have to wait a day or two for their turn anyway. If you have 10 games going, you probably won't notice. Plus, again this will only be advantageous on a few maps if any.AndyDufresne wrote:Deliberately delaying games I don't think is something we can to encourage.
--Andy
Re: Rule change
For those who like to deadbeat turns please put a "deadbeat" skip turn command button so we that like to play don't have to wait 24hours.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Re: Rule change
well it's not an option playing risk. i know that this is not risk, per se but still...
had i been wise, i would have seen that her simplicity cost her a fortune
- Georgerx7di
- Posts: 2277
- Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 7:11 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: Rule change
It is if you're playing with dishonest people, and you take too long in the bathroomkhazalid wrote:well it's not an option playing risk. i know that this is not risk, per se but still...
Re: Rule change
Georgerx7di wrote:It is if you're playing with dishonest people, and you take too long in the bathroomkhazalid wrote:well it's not an option playing risk. i know that this is not risk, per se but still...
please refer to my avy!
deadbeating is terrible.
- Kalano Sanchin
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:23 am
- Gender: Male
Re: Rule change
I love this idea. It would indeed add new strategy into team games.
- haggispittjr
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:25 pm
- Location: montreal, quebec, canada
Re: Rule change
not me, but alot of people will get pretty pissed off having to wait for a person to deadbeat. especialy freemiums