negative replies

The Collection · Post by **The Collection** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:53 am

wounder how many negative replies I can get? I wanna beat the highest record on this site.

Mongoose · Post by **Mongoose** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:54 am

Why would you want to do that? Do you enjoy being a dick?

The Collection · Post by **The Collection** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:00 am

Mongoose wrote:Why would you want to do that? Do you enjoy being a dick?

nah, I just figured trying to be the best player would be hard because very one wants that. I decided trying to be the worst is much more easier.

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:03 am

You are certainly well on your way with your wierdo hacking theories.

Flickflack · Post by **Flickflack** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:19 am

Perhaps it's reverse psychology. Since he's a) paranoid and b) convinced that everyone's a 1337 h4xx0r, maybe he's hoping someone with hack him to have the highest score.

I'm on to you!

kclborat · Post by **kclborat** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:39 am

the worst player is benji. not in terms of feedback, just points

Jamie · Post by **Jamie** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:15 am

Dugcarr has 20 negatives. Anybody with more?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:17 am

if we could give FB for being an ass in the forums, Jaime would have the most.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:27 am

wicked wrote:if we could give FB for being an ass in the forums, Jaime would have the most.

although I'll admit, he is a good doubles partner.

Jamie · Post by **Jamie** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:39 am

wicked wrote:if we could give FB for being an ass in the forums, Jaime would have the most.

The biggest ass in the forums would be The collection. How many threads has he left accusing high ranked players of hacking the system to achieve their ranks.

mandalorian2298 · Post by **mandalorian2298** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:15 pm

Jamie wrote:
wicked wrote:if we could give FB for being an ass in the forums, Jaime would have the most.
The biggest ass in the forums would be The collection. How many threads has he left accusing high ranked players of hacking the system to achieve their ranks.

But he only has 20 posts. Not really a contender for the crown, not yet, but the potential is definatly there.

Although he hasn't used the word hacking in his two last posts.

AK_iceman · Post by **AK_iceman** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:19 pm

Jamie wrote:
wicked wrote:if we could give FB for being an ass in the forums, Jaime would have the most.
The biggest ass in the forums would be The collection. How many threads has he left accusing high ranked players of hacking the system to achieve their ranks.

He only has 20 posts of stupid nonsense, you have over 200 of racist, sexist, elitist crap that pisses off a lot more people.
Maybe we should add a poll to find out for sure who people dislike the most?

Jamie · Post by **Jamie** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:20 pm

AK_iceman wrote:
Jamie wrote:
wicked wrote:if we could give FB for being an ass in the forums, Jaime would have the most.
The biggest ass in the forums would be The collection. How many threads has he left accusing high ranked players of hacking the system to achieve their ranks.
He only has 20 posts of stupid nonsense, you have over 200 of racist, sexist, elitist crap that pisses off a lot more people.
Maybe we should add a poll to find out for sure who people dislike the most?

Yes, all 200 are that way, I'm sure. Which of my post have been sexist??

benjij · Post by **benjij** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:04 pm

kclborat wrote:the worst player is benji. not in terms of feedback, just points

lol

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 10:32 pm

so collection, do you want us to give you negative feedback?

The Collection · Post by **The Collection** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 12:45 am

Jamie wrote:he biggest ass in the forums would be The collection..

and don't you forget it!

wcaclimbing wrote:so collection, do you want us to give you negative feedback?

that would be nice, but I rather earn it.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:12 am

Collection has been officially warned not to abuse the feedback system by fishing for negatives. All his feedback left to date, and the corresponding retaliatory feedbacks, have been deleted. I'll continue to monitor him, but please let me know if he leaves any unfair/unjust feedback. Do not retaliate with a negative of your own, just PM me. Thanks.