Additional Rating "Explanations"

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
Kapad
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:31 am
Location: Argentina

Additional Rating "Explanations"

Post by Kapad »

I want to suggest a few ratings comments that I wish I could use...

1. "Lucky" (Sometimes you lose to a total idiot due to about three odds defying rolls) I usually mark the down on gamesmanship because they displayed no real skill, just fantasy dice.

2. "Ratings Wrecker" for those few you play where they give nobody a decent rating.

3. "Asshole" no explanation necessary
User avatar
AndyDufresne
Posts: 24919
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo
Contact:

Re: Additional Rating "Explanations"

Post by AndyDufresne »

Moved to Suggestions.


--Andy
User avatar
e_i_pi
Posts: 1775
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:19 pm
Location: Corruption Capital of the world
Contact:

Re: Additional Rating "Explanations"

Post by e_i_pi »

4. "Wadwhacker" - Someone who jerks off in the Top 5 threads

5. "Coconut nose" - Forum goer who brown noses the mods so much that their nose now resembles a coconut due to its hue, and the hairs stuck to it

6. "Wrongman douchereg" - A player who insists that you're the strongest player in the game, and that you must be destroyed, when you hold 1 territory, he holds 2, and the other guy has a +38 bonus
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Additional Rating "Explanations"

Post by MeDeFe »

I suggest a popup whenever anyone wants to rate someone else. In all caps, size 200. Fullscreen. Text roughly as follows.

"3 stars is meant to be the average rating, not every player can be outstanding and deserve 5 stars. Unless the player you're about to rate absolutely blew your mind away with their pure awesomeness don't give them 5 stars in any category."
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Thezzaruz
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: OTF most of the time.
Contact:

Re: Additional Rating "Explanations"

Post by Thezzaruz »

MeDeFe wrote:I suggest a popup whenever anyone wants to rate someone else. In all caps, size 200. Fullscreen. Text roughly as follows.

"3 stars is meant to be the average rating, not every player can be outstanding and deserve 5 stars. Unless the player you're about to rate absolutely blew your mind away with their pure awesomeness don't give them 5 stars in any category."
Whole heartedly seconded.
User avatar
Supermarioluigi
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: uhh...over there

Re: Additional Rating "Explanations"

Post by Supermarioluigi »

MeDeFe wrote:I suggest a popup whenever anyone wants to rate someone else. In all caps, size 200. Fullscreen. Text roughly as follows.

"3 stars is meant to be the average rating, not every player can be outstanding and deserve 5 stars. Unless the player you're about to rate absolutely blew your mind away with their pure awesomeness don't give them 5 stars in any category."

But then most ratings will have to retroactively readjusted accordingly, and I'm sure that no one wants to do that.

(Personally, I've left over 700 ratings, and there's no way you can get me to go back and change them all; and teamCC certainly doesn't have time to fix it either)
Image
Achieved August 27, 2009
User avatar
KraphtOne
Posts: 944
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 7:33 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Additional Rating "Explanations"

Post by KraphtOne »

Every Time I Rate Someone I Look For The "Idiot" Tag But Its Still Not There...
ws1
Posts: 114
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:05 am
Location: Chicago, New York, Detroit and its all on the same street

Re: Additional Rating "Explanations"

Post by ws1 »

I like e_i_pi's #6 carefull consideration should be given to that one.
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”