PKeough and Saxitoxin [Cleared]
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
PKeough and Saxitoxin [Cleared]
Accused:
PKeough
Saxitoxin
The accused are suspected of:
Other: In a game I played, both threatened to suicide into whoever attacked them. When I protested at that reasoning, both took action in support of their threats despite my having not attacked.
Game number(s):
Game 5241422
:From the Chat:
2009-07-11 21:18:55 - PKeough: first to try and take me out recieves the remainder of all my forces
2009-07-11 21:19:56 - PatriceB: would that be as an ally? or an enemy?
2009-07-11 21:21:33 - PKeough: first to try and destroy me receives the brunt of the rest of my forces
2009-07-11 21:29:41 - PKeough: i am redirecting all my remaining forces upon the agressor
Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by myself and the other player.
PKeough
Saxitoxin
The accused are suspected of:
Other: In a game I played, both threatened to suicide into whoever attacked them. When I protested at that reasoning, both took action in support of their threats despite my having not attacked.
Game number(s):
Game 5241422
:From the Chat:
2009-07-11 21:18:55 - PKeough: first to try and take me out recieves the remainder of all my forces
2009-07-11 21:19:56 - PatriceB: would that be as an ally? or an enemy?
2009-07-11 21:21:33 - PKeough: first to try and destroy me receives the brunt of the rest of my forces
2009-07-11 21:29:41 - PKeough: i am redirecting all my remaining forces upon the agressor
Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by myself and the other player.
Last edited by PatriceB on Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- the.killing.44
- Posts: 4724
- Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 7:43 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: now tell me what got two gums and knows how to spit rhymes
- Contact:
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
When/if you foed him, it hides his game chat.PatriceB wrote:Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by other players.
2009-07-11 22:29:17 - saxitoxin: In fact, I'll go so far as to say anyone who retaliates against one of my attacks I'll respond by suiciding themself against them.
.44
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
Patrice...did you happen to foe Saxitoxin? You see, when you foe someone, their game-chat is cleared out of your view. It's still THERE...but you can't see it. So if you unfoe him, you'll see it again, I suspect.PatriceB wrote:Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by other players.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
Can't speak for PKeough but I can speak for myself:PatriceB wrote:Accused:
PKeough
Saxitoxin
The accused are suspected of:
Other: In a game I played, both threatened to suicide into whoever attacked them. When I protested at that reasoning, both took action in support of their threats despite my having not attacked.
Game number(s):
Game 5241422
:From the Chat:
2009-07-11 21:18:55 - PKeough: first to try and take me out recieves the remainder of all my forces
2009-07-11 21:19:56 - PatriceB: would that be as an ally? or an enemy?
2009-07-11 21:21:33 - PKeough: first to try and destroy me receives the brunt of the rest of my forces
2009-07-11 21:29:41 - PKeough: i am redirecting all my remaining forces upon the agressor
Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by other players.
(1) I don't have the technical know-how to go back and "edit" chats.
(2) The one potential comment Patrice might take issue with that hasn't been "edited out"
saxitoxin: In fact, I'll go so far as to say anyone who retaliates against one of my attacks I'll respond by suiciding themself against them.
note I did not say I was suiciding myself, I said "suiciding themself against them" - in other words, defeating anyone who tries to suicide against me ... I hope we can use the word "suicide" with an occasional spirit of levity in-game chat without having someone with articles stuck up inside their body cavity taking everything with grim-faced, stone-like seriousness
finally, I won the game so obviously there was no "suicide" going on by me
Last edited by saxitoxin on Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
Yes, I did foe him. Thank you both very much. 
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
BTW - I friended Patrice because I think a foe is a friend you just don't know well enough.PatriceB wrote:Yes, I did foe him. Thank you both very much.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
The real crime here is PatriceB being a sore loser, whining, and generally acting like a gigantic pussy.
I have no further words for the court. The defense rests.
The real crime here is PatriceB being a sore loser, whining, and generally acting like a gigantic pussy.
I have no further words for the court. The defense rests.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
-
Strife
- Posts: 2668
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Now something has kept me here too long.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
It would seem you don't like it from the other side.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
I don't have a problem with it. I am only, as always, concerned about facilitating a proactive and cooperative atmosphere for the mods. Having a bunch of lookey-loos jump in doesn't help jurisprudence.Strife wrote:It would seem you don't like it from the other side.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
You'll find out about jurisprudence soon.
Last edited by saxitoxin on Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
It would appear that you don't understand the various place-settings enough to comment accurately on it.saxitoxin wrote:No problem with it at all. Just don't like it from the other side if it's coming from a mere school marm, uppity as she may be. She needs to learn her place.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
Interesting how you've changed your quote once I quoted it showing you just how bad it looked. Your dishonesty and lying knows no bounds!saxitoxin wrote:I don't have a problem with it. I am only, as always, concerned about facilitating a proactive and cooperative atmosphere for the mods. Having a bunch of lookey-loos jump in doesn't help jurisprudence.Strife wrote:It would seem you don't like it from the other side.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
You'll find out about jurisprudence soon.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
Woodruff, you silly old school marm - Patrice posted it! Woodruff, you tickle my feathers endlessly! Never stop being you! Love ya' Woodsie!Woodruff wrote:I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.

Woodruff At Work
-
Strife
- Posts: 2668
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Now something has kept me here too long.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
Edit: quoted so they can't edit the flame out again.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm - Patrice posted it! Woodruff, you tickle my feathers endlessly! Never stop being you! Love ya' Woodsie!Woodruff wrote:Flaming is not permitted in these forums hypocrite.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!
Woodruff At Work
Last edited by Strife on Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
You're right...she did. It shouldn't have been hard for me to tell, I guess...given that you've started so many ridiculous threads in this forum that I should have realized this non-ridiculous one couldn't possibly have been started by you.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm - Patrice posted it!Woodruff wrote:I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
Of course the only reason you've said this is because it was quoted before you could get rid of it...saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
No.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
Last edited by Woodruff on Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
reported for trollingWoodruff wrote:No.saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
How very ironic.saxitoxin wrote:reported for trollingWoodruff wrote:No.saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
reported for flamingWoodruff wrote:How very ironic.saxitoxin wrote:reported for trollingWoodruff wrote:No.saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
How very laughable.saxitoxin wrote:reported for flamingWoodruff wrote:How very ironic.saxitoxin wrote:reported for trollingWoodruff wrote:No.saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
-
Strife
- Posts: 2668
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 3:24 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Now something has kept me here too long.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
Reported for making me laugh.
It would seem that the troll has taken it's course, much like a hurricane that blew itself out, it is too weak to go on. All ground that it stood on has collapsed and they are now standing on air. The only thing we are slightly guilty of is feeding you, the troll.
It would seem that the troll has taken it's course, much like a hurricane that blew itself out, it is too weak to go on. All ground that it stood on has collapsed and they are now standing on air. The only thing we are slightly guilty of is feeding you, the troll.
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
Get a life Woodruff
Re: PKeough and Saxitoxin
I have no need for two of them, but thanks for the suggestion.PKeough wrote:Get a life Woodruff
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.