rank of cook

Post by **Caymanmew** » Sat May 16, 2009 4:33 pm

i beleave it is not nice have a rank of cook. it is not anice feeling to think you are so low you are not eveing in a army rank. i think the lowest should be cadet.

what do you think?

JoshyBoy · Post by **JoshyBoy** » Sat May 16, 2009 4:37 pm

Wow this is one pointless topic.

Oh well, might as well give my input.

I don't see what the problem is with having the rank of cook. But if your going to get rid of it you might as well throw cadet out as well.

obliterationX · Post by **obliterationX** » Sat May 16, 2009 4:41 pm

To be honest, we need lower than Cook, lol.

JoshyBoy · Post by **JoshyBoy** » Sat May 16, 2009 4:42 pm

obliterationX wrote:To be honest, we need lower than Cook, lol.

What like chambermaid or something?

ManBungalow · Post by **ManBungalow** » Sat May 16, 2009 4:47 pm

JoshyBoy wrote:
obliterationX wrote:To be honest, we need lower than Cook, lol.
What like chambermaid or something?

Conscientious objector ?

JoshyBoy · Post by **JoshyBoy** » Sat May 16, 2009 4:48 pm

Was thinking maybe "Cabin boy"? lol

Oh and they have Cooks in the army caymanmew.

Admit it your just like me. Sitting on CC all the time, getting bored and starting up new topics just to give you something to do

Shatners Bassoon · Post by **Shatners Bassoon** » Sat May 16, 2009 4:51 pm

Rank of cook?

boiled cabbage?

JoshyBoy · Post by **JoshyBoy** » Sat May 16, 2009 4:58 pm

Ok in all fairness if you play CC regularly and your the rank of cook on like a permanent basis then you must be pretty shit (pardon the language lol) and deserve to wear that hat of shame.

Like ObliterationX said we actually need lower... to show up the ridiculously shocking players.

Post by **Caymanmew** » Sat May 16, 2009 5:37 pm

JoshyBoy wrote:Admit it your just like me. Sitting on CC all the time, getting bored and starting up new topics just to give you something to do

ya ok it true but maby caben boy would be a good rank

owenshooter · Post by **owenshooter** » Sat May 16, 2009 5:42 pm

i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0

Woodruff · Post by **Woodruff** » Sat May 16, 2009 5:47 pm

caymanmew wrote:i beleave it is not nice have a rank of cook. it is not anice feeling to think you are so low you are not eveing in a army rank. i think the lowest should be cadet.
what do you think?

In my opinion, "last is last"...what you call it is irrelevant. If someone feels badly because they're at the rank of cook, then they'll feel equally badly when they're at the rank of cadet (if it's the bottom rank).

redhawk92 · Post by **redhawk92** » Sat May 16, 2009 6:06 pm

should be secretary bellow cook

Georgerx7di · Post by **Georgerx7di** » Sat May 16, 2009 7:55 pm

kylegraves1 wrote:should be secretary bellow cook

No, secretaries are usually below the guy in charge. Unless he's really faithful.

The Neon Peon · Post by **The Neon Peon** » Sat May 16, 2009 9:02 pm

owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0

I have never been to cook.

djt5483 · Post by **djt5483** » Sat May 16, 2009 9:09 pm

The Neon Peon wrote:
owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0
I have never been to cook.

ive never been a cook either, i dont think ive ever been below 900

a.sub · Post by **a.sub** » Sat May 16, 2009 9:09 pm

The Neon Peon wrote:
owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0
I have never been to cook.

just point dump to me and u wont ever have to feel that way again

EagleofGreenErth · Post by **EagleofGreenErth** » Sat May 16, 2009 9:10 pm

One has to try hard to get to cook... my 1000+ point dump only got me to lieut!

the.killing.44 · Post by **the.killing.44** » Sat May 16, 2009 9:12 pm

I was cook for ~3 minutes I think. Then I won a speeder.

.44

The Neon Peon · Post by **The Neon Peon** » Sat May 16, 2009 9:18 pm

a.sub wrote:
The Neon Peon wrote:
owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0
I have never been to cook.
just point dump to me and u wont ever have to feel that way again

It might be my goal to get to cook for 3 months now, but I am still planning on trying to do it while doing my best to win every game.

djt5483 · Post by **djt5483** » Sat May 16, 2009 9:19 pm

the only time i was even close, the rank of cook didnt exist. 1v1 didnt exist and speed games didnt exist lol

sully800 · Post by **sully800** » Sat May 16, 2009 11:41 pm

djt5483 wrote:
The Neon Peon wrote:
owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0
I have never been to cook.
ive never been a cook either, i dont think ive ever been below 900

Never been below 1000 and never will be.

djt5483 · Post by **djt5483** » Sun May 17, 2009 4:05 am

sully800 wrote:
djt5483 wrote:
The Neon Peon wrote:
owenshooter wrote:i really thought it was a piece of bread (non premium) or toast (premium), when i first joined... the rank should stay, we've all been there. some of us just can't seem to get out of the loaf...-0
I have never been to cook.
ive never been a cook either, i dont think ive ever been below 900
Never been below 1000 and never will be.

i lost my first 3 games then i started winnin

demonfork · Post by **demonfork** » Sun May 17, 2009 5:08 am

The rank below baker should be jizz mopper

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... z%20mopper

JoshyBoy · Post by **JoshyBoy** » Sun May 17, 2009 5:11 am

demonfork wrote:The rank below baker should be jizz mopper

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... z%20mopper

karelpietertje · Post by **karelpietertje** » Sun May 17, 2009 5:24 am

demonfork wrote:The rank below baker should be jizz mopper

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... z%20mopper

hehe nice one. I dont know if they have Jizz Moppers in the army though

this topic got me thinking though. not in the way it's meant, feeling sorry for the cooks, but wondering if we should have a lower rank.
I think so. when I play a cook, its quite a big difference between a 799 point cook and a 100 point cook. mind, that's 600 points, but relatively it's 800% difference, which means a lot for point distribution after a game.

I say there should be a new rank below 500.
we should have a brainstorming contest how to name it.
first option: replace 'cook' with janitor, and have everybody beneath 500 be a cook.

of course this will raise debate on what is considered lower, a cook or a janitor?

rank of cook

rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook

Re: rank of cook