kchristy1 [busted]

[wood]

Accused: Being Multis

kchristy1 ndrake74



The accused are suspected of: Being Multis

Game number(s):
4848916
4845287
4834662
4610843
4609786
4608938
4534828
4444388
4361348
4196815
4149201
4127146
4046572
3965706
3854433
3786209
3585755
3576462
3498355
3438472
3428303


Comments:

kchristy1 & ndrake74 must be multi. ndrake74 has played 27 of his 29 games with kchrsty. ndrake and kchristy RARELY attack each other, only in final stage of game, and kchristy always plays better and wins. ndrake has only won 1 game of 29, while kchristy wins many games when ndrake is also playing. Additionally, when they play a game together, they almost always sign up for the game right next to each other. Both usernames are first letter first name, then last name with number. Obvious multi.

What's worse, I realized this after starting a game with this multi, but no turns have been played yet. I bet they don't attack each other, lol.

[king sam]

Accused:
kchristy1
ndrake74

The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis

Game number(s):
Game 4848916
Game 4845287
Game 4834662
Game 4610843
Game 4609786
Game 4608938
Game 4534828
Game 4444388
Game 4361348
Game 4196815
Game 4149201
Game 4127146
Game 4046572
Game 3965706
Game 3854433
Game 3786209
Game 3585755
Game 3576462
Game 3498355
Game 3438472
Game 3428303

Links input

[JCKing]

Interesting because most of the games they have played together in are sequential, but looking at it evertime ndrake joins kchristy's games they join one after the other. Looks like they could be friends or siblings possibly, or something of that order.

[wood]

Interesting because most of the games they have played together in are sequential, but looking at it evertime ndrake joins kchristy's games they join one after the other. Looks like they could be friends or siblings possibly, or something of that order.

yeah i considered that at first too. but ndrake74 ALWAYS loses (except once) to kcristy1. They DON'T attack each other unless forced. i think joining together is more of an arguement that they ARE a multi. 1 person joins both accts at same time is more logical than 1 friend joining then telling friend to join and that friend immediately joining too without someone joining in between them. At worst its a multi, at best its secret diplomacy. last time i checked, both of these things are against the rules.

im really surprised that they havent already been reported before this. it seems pretty clear cut to me.

[wood]

I'm adding more evidence for the MULTI-BUSTERS

when kchristy1 plays WITHOUT ndrake74 (16 of 42 games) he won 3 of 16 games = 18.75% win percentage (not so hot)

when kcritsty plays WITH ndrake 74 (26 of 42 games) he won 15 of them = 57.69% win percentage (very good!)

no wonder he plays with his MULTI !!!

ndrake accidentally won 1 of the games he has played for a win percentage of 4%

ban him please

[zeractal]

i have not looked at any of the games but from what you are describing it seems to me they are likely to be siblings more than multi's.
It would explain why they join together as they would both be online at the same time (one wants to join they ask the other first)
It would also explain why one account has won nearly all the games, due to the fact the better of the two is more likely to keep men in reserve while they work together giving them the advantage when its only the two siblings remain, the exception being a game neither team could afford to keep men in reserve, puting the siblings on level pegging. (haven't cheched if this scans with the game).

If this is the case its still secret diplomacy and against the rules but seems more likely than multis to me.

[zeractal]

the game ndrake74 won was one of the first, which on the assumption they are a multi could be because kchristy1 wasn't sure which account to use as primary (kchristy1 games go better so it becomes primary? i am not able to check there score at that time im afraid, so can't support that theory) or they wanted to win more points per game so not put of high ranks by having a really low rank join.

alternativly if they are not a multi
could be evidence that kchristy1 has improved with time and ndrake74 hasn't therfore not multi's
chance game bound to happen if you play a lot of games with someone
kchristy1 might have been used to playing offline so found it harder adapting to subtle differences

could be argued either way but possibly worth a mention

[king achilles]

Busted.

[Bruceswar]

Busted.

Busted with who?

[lancehoch]

kchristy1 and ndrake74 were busted with one another.

[JJ41375]

I was actually on-line and saw KChristy1 winning a game with myself and other players. KChristy did win our game, so I looked back at the log and noticed that the other one (NDrake- I forgot the number) only attacked me and one of the other players.

KChristy appeared to attack everybody, but I am not sure if NDrake was just in the way.

I did notice one strange move by NDrake and another player called on it, which I definately understand. "Petrocelli: ndrake: That's a lot of troops to waste going after australia. Now we are both screwed."

Not sure what any of this means, but thought I would report it in case it wasn't already. Thanks.

JJ