*NSFW* Soft Pokeporn! *NSFW*

pimpdave · Post by **pimpdave** » Sat May 09, 2009 8:14 pm

mod edit

Lucarilover240 · Post by **Lucarilover240** » Sat May 09, 2009 8:23 pm

pimpdave wrote:mod edit

F*ck, I knew that would attract him...

sheepofdumb · Post by **sheepofdumb** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:19 am

EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:I was intrigued by the title, thinking this thread would be some little joke. I just skimmed over the thread, and I have a few comments, and one question.

Some of the artwork here is of surprising quality to me, which makes me think that these people take this stuff seriously, and it is my opinion that anything that a group as large as "yiffers" takes seriously should be considered a respected opinion, and should be treated as such. If some people enjoy looking at these pics, let them. Who is harmed by this niche in the furry subculture?

If an opinion is worth respecting, it is deserving of a well reasoned counter-argument, not a bunch of pictures of projectile vomiting, and a few dozen slurs being thrown around.

And, how many people here, excluding yiffers, actually find the projectile vomiting more offensive than the "yiffy" pics? I do.

This is just the soft stuff. There is much more disturbing things in the fandom. But there's a lot of quality to that stuff. Just go in knowing that furries aren't just sex starved perverts who get off to animals. There's a lot of respectable furs. Lawyers, doctors, you name it. They also make a lot of creative, clean, quality art. Lucari got sort of a counter-argument in me chewing him out for giving furs a bad light. So I think we are good there.

Lucarilover240 · Post by **Lucarilover240** » Sun May 10, 2009 9:08 am

sheepofdumb wrote:
This is just the soft stuff. There is much more disturbing things in the fandom. But there's a lot of quality to that stuff. Just go in knowing that furries aren't just sex starved perverts who get off to animals. There's a lot of respectable furs. Lawyers, doctors, you name it. They also make a lot of creative, clean, quality art. Lucari got sort of a counter-argument in me chewing him out for giving furs a bad light. So I think we are good there.

Yeah, we're good. You have my respect.

e_i_pi · Post by **e_i_pi** » Sun May 10, 2009 10:47 am

dcowboys055 · Post by **dcowboys055** » Sun May 10, 2009 11:30 am

Eww, wtf

jonesthecurl · Post by **jonesthecurl** » Sun May 10, 2009 1:14 pm

THAT'S DITHPICCABUL.

jonesthecurl · Post by **jonesthecurl** » Sun May 10, 2009 1:15 pm

Though for once Bugs doesn't have to ask "what's 'up' ". He knows what's up, he put it there.

EvilPurpleMonkey · Post by **EvilPurpleMonkey** » Sun May 10, 2009 1:25 pm

Someone gouge out my eys, and ban that SOB. Bleeding trolls.

EvilPurpleMonkey · Post by **EvilPurpleMonkey** » Sun May 10, 2009 1:26 pm

Thread Locking in T-Minus...

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Sun May 10, 2009 3:22 pm

It's gayporn with Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck.

I can hardly believe it.

EvilPurpleMonkey · Post by **EvilPurpleMonkey** » Sun May 10, 2009 3:24 pm

WHERE ARE THE MODS!
Really, that obviously violates forum rules.

...Maybe all the mods are too afraid to come in here...

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Sun May 10, 2009 3:26 pm

EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:WHERE ARE THE MODS!
Really, that obviously violates forum rules.

...Maybe all the mods are too afraid to come in here...

Well, it's not "real" the way a photography or photoshop is so it might not really violate the rules, but someone will probably be banned anyway.

EvilPurpleMonkey · Post by **EvilPurpleMonkey** » Sun May 10, 2009 3:29 pm

MeDeFe wrote:
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:WHERE ARE THE MODS!
Really, that obviously violates forum rules.

...Maybe all the mods are too afraid to come in here...
Well, it's not "real" the way a photography or photoship is so it might not really violate the rules, but someone will probably be banned anyway.

...Really? Is that a loophole?

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Sun May 10, 2009 3:30 pm

EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:
MeDeFe wrote:
EvilPurpleMonkey wrote:WHERE ARE THE MODS!
Really, that obviously violates forum rules.

...Maybe all the mods are too afraid to come in here...
Well, it's not "real" the way a photography or photoshop is so it might not really violate the rules, but someone will probably be banned anyway.
...Really? Is that a loophole?

If it is it won't be one for much longer.

EvilPurpleMonkey · Post by **EvilPurpleMonkey** » Sun May 10, 2009 3:32 pm

From the community Guidelines

Nudity and sexual material are not allowed.

Any images or textual descriptions of sexual activity or nudity - nipples, areola, genitals, anuses etc - whether intended as artistic, erotic, pornographic or otherwise are not allowed.
This includes content posted here and links to other sites. Posting NSFW - "Not Suitable For Work" - does not make it ok for posting.
If it is ambiguous, we'll ask you to remove it anyway, so "It's a guy's nipple" isn't going to fly. You're just trying to be annoying at that point.
Posting a painting from the 13th century with exposed nipples to claim that we're evil dictators when we ask you to remove it is also just being annoying, and you're probably just being a troll at that point.

ANY images. Any. It is not a loophole.

john9blue · Post by **john9blue** » Sun May 10, 2009 3:36 pm

!

Coming on 5 hours that's been up. Are the mods busy jerking off or what?

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun May 10, 2009 5:08 pm

I think it's gone now, and I missed it...

Lucarilover240 · Post by **Lucarilover240** » Sun May 10, 2009 5:45 pm

I think I missed it too, and based on the various comments, I think I'm glad I did.

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Sun May 10, 2009 5:47 pm

Saw it.

john9blue · Post by **john9blue** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:35 pm

Serbia wrote:Saw it.

Saved it. Kidding.

Lucarilover240 · Post by **Lucarilover240** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:37 pm

john9blue wrote:
Serbia wrote:Saw it.
Saved it. Kidding.

You truly are at home here aren't y- Oh, wait, didn't see the "kidding", sorry.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:45 pm

john9blue wrote:
Serbia wrote:Saw it.
Saved it. Kidding.

Really? I would have... Just so I could freak the shit out of other people. I have a lot of images for that purpose.

Lucarilover240 · Post by **Lucarilover240** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:46 pm

hecter wrote:
john9blue wrote:
Serbia wrote:Saw it.
Saved it. Kidding.
Really? I would have... Just so I could freak the shit out of other people. I have a lot of images for that purpose.

(strengthens thread defenses)

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun May 10, 2009 7:50 pm

Lucarilover240 wrote:
hecter wrote:
john9blue wrote:
Serbia wrote:Saw it.
Saved it. Kidding.
Really? I would have... Just so I could freak the shit out of other people. I have a lot of images for that purpose.
(strengthens thread defenses)

*thinks about putting up "The Garfield" picture (it's much worse than it sounds)*

NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

What is your opinion on furry?

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW

Re: NSFW Soft Pokeporn! NSFW