autoload's 12 Player Mafia Game #1 --- End --- Town wins!

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:59 pm

Think about how your win condition is stated, and then think about why it is stated that way, and then think about how much my serial killer theory makes sense

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:00 pm

wow, I'm sold. I was wondering about the two methods of death as well. Nice writing Auto!

So why did Sen say RK was the vigilante, and not the doc?

And where do we go from here?

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:01 pm

Well, I could make a big case including lots of quotes and explaining, or you could just trust my hunch.

Houssam is the serial killer.

Vote Houssamthegreat

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:02 pm

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:02 pm

Can someone re-read and see if anyone brought up the serial killer previous to this in such a way that makes them look guilty?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:04 pm

ok fast-posted there. uhh, I'm going to need more evidence than just your word. not that I dont' agree with your theories, but I don't follow anyone blindly in this game!

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:04 pm

Do I have to go back and prove it to you

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:05 pm

Machiavelli wrote:I now believe that the deputy(Fircoal) and the mafia cop (Senfive) could talk.

That is why Fircoal was killed, because the mafia knew that he was a cop.

Replay of the first night

Senfive investigated RK to see if his doc claim was true. Auto told Senfive that RK was the doc.

Fircoal investigated someone (we really cant tell who), and reported the results to Senfive. Senfive realized that Fircoal was a cop.

Senfive shares this with the rest of the mafia, and so they kill Fircoal.

The serial killer is the one who killed MB.

The next day we lynched Senfive

Replay of Night two

Option A

The serial killer and the mafia both killed Rev.

Option B

The serial killer tried to kill rev, because of Rev's claim.

And the mafia tried to kill me, because of how sure I was of Sen's guilt.

Rev protected me.

errrr.... what??

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:06 pm

what do YOU think?

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:06 pm

Fine, I understand.

If you want to look for your self though, check out those pages where Houssam is trying to find out what Rev was implying.

There is more but I dont remember where it was atm.

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:07 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:I now believe that the deputy(Fircoal) and the mafia cop (Senfive) could talk.

That is why Fircoal was killed, because the mafia knew that he was a cop.

Replay of the first night

Senfive investigated RK to see if his doc claim was true. Auto told Senfive that RK was the doc.

Fircoal investigated someone (we really cant tell who), and reported the results to Senfive. Senfive realized that Fircoal was a cop.

Senfive shares this with the rest of the mafia, and so they kill Fircoal.

The serial killer is the one who killed MB.

The next day we lynched Senfive

Replay of Night two

Option A

The serial killer and the mafia both killed Rev.

Option B

The serial killer tried to kill rev, because of Rev's claim.

And the mafia tried to kill me, because of how sure I was of Sen's guilt.

Rev protected me.

errrr.... what??

Dont deny it, you will only make yourself look guiltier

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:08 pm

Houssam, If I hadnt accused you of being the serial killer, you do agree that there is a serial killer correct?

Think carefully before you answer, but answer quickly too.

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:10 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
autoload wrote:Examining his body the town found that he was both shot in the head and slit across the throat.
QFE

I thought we were not meant to read too much into the details. no?

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:11 pm

Machiavelli wrote:Houssam, If I hadnt accused you of being the serial killer, you do agree that there is a serial killer correct?

Think carefully before you answer, but answer quickly too.

I actually missed the fact that you accused me of being the serial killer. I posted as soon as I read the whole deputy was talking to the mafia cop scenario.

now that i know you are accusing me, I don't like you that much anymore!!

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:11 pm

So is thta a no? You dont think there is a serial killer?

Answer quickly now.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:12 pm

That's in Andy's games Houssam. Auto never stated that condition.

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:13 pm

Machiavelli wrote:Well, I could make a big case including lots of quotes and explaining, or you could just trust my hunch.

Houssam is the serial killer.

Vote Houssamthegreat

oh THERE it is.
What have I done again? Why not you being the serial killer? and if I were, why did I not get rid of you last night since you had already said you were going on that trail?

Clearly a retaliatory but also on the merits of the case FOS Mac...

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:14 pm

Machiavelli wrote:So is thta a no? You dont think there is a serial killer?

Answer quickly now.

I think there clearly is either a serial killer or a vigilante. It's just not me. either!

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:16 pm

Think about your win condition, does it not imply that there is a 2nd anti-town party?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:17 pm

So does a serial killer win when everyone else is dead?

H, I think it's clear by the townie win condition that there's a serial killer, not a vigilante. A vigilante would give the town too much power, game wouldn't be balanced.

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:18 pm

Machiavelli wrote:Think about your win condition, does it not imply that there is a 2nd anti-town party?

right. now that you mention this it's kinda obvious. this is why the reference is not to eliminate mafia which it typically would be - that's why senfive tripped - makes a whole lot of sense now. sort of like wearing glasses for the first time.

I am off for an hour - so if I am delayed responding you will know.

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:19 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote: Why not you being the serial killer? and if I were, why did I not get rid of you last night since you had already said you were going on that trail?

What trail are you reffering to?

And as for why you didnt kill me, you were happy getting the doctor

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:21 pm

Wicked, Houssam is anti-town, and from the way he interacted with Senfive, I highly doubt he is mafia.

If I bet my life on the fact will that get your vote? I am fully willing to bet my life that Houssam is anti-town.

Incandenza · Post by **Incandenza** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:21 pm

Okay, Mach, the serial killer thing is good...

And I get why the mafia would kill RK

And I get why the serial killer would kill RK

But you're going to have to do better than 'I've got a hunch that houssam is the serial killer'...

I'll be around intermittently.... work beckons

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:25 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
HoussamTheGreat wrote: Why not you being the serial killer? and if I were, why did I not get rid of you last night since you had already said you were going on that trail?

What trail are you reffering to?

And as for why you didnt kill me, you were happy getting the doctor

Do the serial killer and mafia communicate? If your theory about the double killing is corect, then clearly the don't. If they don't then the only info that he had was rk being the vig, which on the face of it makes this a strange killing for him. Am I missing something?