Moderator: Tech Team
Kotaro wrote:According to this board, my current rank overall rank is 1198. Didn't know I lost 400 points in the last few seconds..
Woodruff wrote:Just out of curiousity, why does it show some of the players' Relative Rank as 0.000?
Bruceswar wrote:The missing logs cannot be fixed
31 missing logs
Kotaro wrote:Bruceswar wrote:The missing logs cannot be fixed31 missing logs
Fail
Kotaro wrote:Enter: the trolls.
Where's the rest of BpB? Are they all out planning their next "we're going to quit" thread? Or maybe they're out making a ban-worth new signature?
Go troll another thread. Or better yet, go right a few good paragraphs for the ConquerClub news. Or all your "masterful" pieces of writing, going to be based off of gossip girls?
Kotaro wrote:Bruceswar wrote:The missing logs cannot be fixed31 missing logs
Fail
yeti_c wrote:Kotaro - You are the one trolling this thread.
Chip - Perhaps you could save the number of missing logs on the Scoreboards too... so that people know how accurate others scores are.
Love the idea of an MVP...
Perhaps Chip you might write yourself a version of map rank that you can set going every week or so - that reads the top (say) 1000 players - then map ranks them through to the scoreboard automagically! (I don't know whether your schedule could accomodate this - or Lacks servers - I guess during a low point in server usage would be good!)
C.
chipv wrote:You can sort the scoreboards by the other columns now.
(Games played, Game won, win %, relative rank).
chipv wrote:Ok I guess I can put up some more map scoreboards - any recommendations?
I'll probably put up a few shortly when I get some idea which ones you want.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:chipv wrote:You can sort the scoreboards by the other columns now.
(Games played, Game won, win %, relative rank).
games played- thats me
games won- thats me
win %- most likely me
not much reason for me to sort ?
chipv wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:chipv wrote:You can sort the scoreboards by the other columns now.
(Games played, Game won, win %, relative rank).
games played- thats me
games won- thats me
win %- most likely me
not much reason for me to sort ?
No, there's not much use for you if no medals are involved.
Other people may want to see a listing (the world doesn't revolve around JR24) and in actual fact you're not top of all 42 scoreboards.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:chipv wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:chipv wrote:You can sort the scoreboards by the other columns now.
(Games played, Game won, win %, relative rank).
games played- thats me
games won- thats me
win %- most likely me
not much reason for me to sort ?
No, there's not much use for you if no medals are involved.
Other people may want to see a listing (the world doesn't revolve around JR24) and in actual fact you're not top of all 42 scoreboards.
What ? You better take that back ! All scoreboards? I will have to work on that. Perhaps Blitz should have top 5 players listed in the top 10 of the scoreboards ? I know it would make my day brighter !
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:chipv wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:chipv wrote:You can sort the scoreboards by the other columns now.
(Games played, Game won, win %, relative rank).
games played- thats me
games won- thats me
win %- most likely me
not much reason for me to sort ?
No, there's not much use for you if no medals are involved.
Other people may want to see a listing (the world doesn't revolve around JR24) and in actual fact you're not top of all 42 scoreboards.
What ? You better take that back ! All scoreboards? I will have to work on that. Perhaps Blitz should have top 5 players listed in the top 10 of the scoreboards ? I know it would make my day brighter !
lancehoch wrote:chip, is there any way to write a script so that I only have to click the Maprank button once and all my scoreboard results will be updated?
lancehoch wrote:chip, is there any way to write a script so that I only have to click the Maprank button once and all my scoreboard results will be updated?
chipv wrote:It is difficult. I did look into doing this, but didn't have the time.
It would be embedded into the current code so it won't take longer, just do more adding up. A lot more.
It will have to wait, I will get round to it when I have a significant amount of time available.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users