Moderator: Cartographers
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
cairnswk wrote:gimil and edbeard....just two things i wish to comment on...
1.some of the arrows look lesser quality that others and aren't totally consistent both sides, is this because you have them transparent?
I'm not really sure but they look fine to me and gimil too. Done and Done.
2. is it possible to see the maps for reference to centering using the 88s please.
well this is a FF thing but they are centered. see links below if anyone wishes to look
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:The only problem I see is at1 is out of place edbeard.
gimil wrote:
edbeard wrote:If that doesn't satisfy everything I don't know what will. Good job, Gimil!
http://www.sendspace.com/file/uffstt
if oak could host that again, it fixes the starting neutral and the new coordinate for AT1 on the small map.
apologies for the image quality. I just posted to paint and did it really quick
edbeard wrote:cairnswk wrote:gimil and edbeard....just two things i wish to comment on...
1.some of the arrows look lesser quality that others and aren't totally consistent both sides, is this because you have them transparent?
I'm not really sure but they look fine to me and gimil too. Done and Done.
2. is it possible to see the maps for reference to centering using the 88s please.
well this is a FF thing but they are centered. see links below if anyone wishes to look
xml
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/7/30/2026929/las.xml
small (note that one circle here was moved but in my updated xml ( http://www.sendspace.com/file/uffstt ) it is centered. just needs hosting from someone kind.
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c64/G ... eaS-15.png
large
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c64/G ... eaL-15.png
edbeard wrote:I keep assuming gimil fixed that.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Riazor wrote:Quick question,
Is it possible to have the same army number show up twice on the map? Im asking this because of the territories on both sides of the map (that go around the globe). I dont know whether that would solve some (if there are any) confusion issues, but perhaps its some food for thought, not only for this map.
Sorry for being slightly offtopic here
gimil wrote:edbeard wrote:I keep assuming gimil fixed that.
Never assume I will do anything
yeti_c wrote:gimil wrote:edbeard wrote:I keep assuming gimil fixed that.
Never assume I will do anything
Especially when it is to do with spelling?!
C.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:
Cheers killing, you won a cookie!
cena-rules wrote:great map. The only thing I dont really like is that antarctica seems a bit blocky. I think if you made the borders wavy then Im fine, looks wicked
gimil wrote:Cheers killing, you won a cookie!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users