flexmaster33 wrote:Hi everyone...I've had some complaints about choices for neutral maps and looked into it more closely and thought it was something that should be changed starting with round 2 of the tourney.
When I first selected the maps, I was focusing on mostly geographic maps without a lot of tricks to them or special rules. Since then it has been brought to my attention than some maps are better for 1 vs. 1 based on the territory giveout at the start of a game. Some maps make it much easier for the player going first to get a slight advantage from the drop, and of course, this slight advantage can easily snowball for no other reason that the player was given the first turn.
I've seen the light...maps that start with each player getting 14, 17 or 20 territories give the best chance for both players to have equal armies on their opening turn.
As a result, I've re-evaluated some of the neutral maps in play and replaced them with others that meet the above description.
Here are the changes (they will go into effect for Round 2)
In the South...
The Sweet 16/Elite 8 maps are now Asia and BeNeLux
For the second round...Cairn's Coast replaces Iberia
In the West...
The Sweet 16/Elite 8 maps are now San Francisco and Carribean
In the second round...Hong Kong replaces Africa
In the Midwest...
In the second round...Malta replaces Montreal
In the Northeast...
In the second round...British Isles replaces Tamriel
For the Final Four
the neutral map has changed from San Francisco to North America.
All of these changes are reflected on the newly updated brackets.
I feel like this 2008-09 format is making the championship tournament more of a fair test to decide out 1 vs. 1 champion, and improving this map selection is just another step to making the March Madness bracket that much more fair.
thanks, flex
PS - I'm now keeping a log of maps and starting territories for each one, so that I can refer to it in other tourneys I may organize...since most of mine are 1 vs. 1 events.
I would not complain about maps, but the settings. I got to play 2 flat rate games and I was raped twice by the cards in them.
If you want to make it fair, you would have to make the neutral game in no cards. And make it at least 7 games long. To be frank, if i knew that in the finals i would be playing just 3 games, with 2 of them flat rate, I would not participate in the tournament to start with. You could as well throw a dice to decide a winner
I sound like a sore loser, maybe I am. But the tournament format was so nice in the beginning, and ending was so undefined till the very end and whatever was defined was such a disappointment...