CaptainRex and others [warned]

by **Royal Panda** on Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:59 am

Accused:

CaptainRex
AnalSeepage69
CommanderFox
SeanKitty
JPD2411
F.E.A.R.

+more

The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Comments:

Just look at the walls! I started out by looking at AnalSeepage69 because I'm very suspicious he's a multi (started up about 40 games - inc. freestyles etc. - while still a new recruit), and then saw all these comments on these peoples' various walls. Had put some evidence in the comments here but this post would have ended up being massive. One game I'll point to which seems to be referenced on the walls but not the game chat is 4285578.

There are probably more involved...

by **Hsur** on Wed Feb 25, 2009 11:25 am

Rule #2: No secret diplomacy
Any form of diplomatic discussion between opponents must be posted in the game chat in English or in a language that all opponents understand. Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating assaults. Secret diplomacy can be hard to prove, but if you suspect it you should leave the players in question appropriate ratings. If you feel certain about players engaging in secret diplomacy consider reporting them in the Cheating & Abuse Reports forum by posting a new topic.

They do tell each other what to do on each others walls.
Looks like friends telling each other what to do.

by **F.E.A.R.** on Thu Feb 26, 2009 4:31 pm

Accused:

AnalSeepage69
CaptainRex

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis (possibly)
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):

4285578

Comments:
You can look at their walls where they obviously negotiated the alliance, at which point they attacked in game on the players they had agreed on. They also have been taking their turns almost immediatly after each other so Im not sure if they might be multi's covering for it.

by **demonfork** on Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:18 pm

analseepage is definitely a multi, I called that on the day he/she/it registered, but was to lazy to fill out the form, + I know someone else would eventually do it.

by **king sam** on Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:03 am

F.E.A.R. wrote:Accused:
AnalSeepage69
CaptainRex

The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis (possibly)
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):
4285578

Comments:
You can look at their walls where they obviously negotiated the alliance, at which point they attacked in game on the players they had agreed on. They also have been taking their turns almost immediatly after each other so Im not sure if they might be multi's covering for it.

These 2 are already in an ACTIVE "lawsuit" along with others, it can be found here.

For the exact same reason. Either these players are multi's or conducting secret diplomacy, seeing as the first thread has not been ruled upon yet, they haven't officially been "Warned, or Busted" yet.

King Sam

by **lancehoch** on Fri Feb 27, 2009 11:53 am

I have merged the two threads relating to the same game. Thanks for the link sam.

by **F.E.A.R.** on Fri Feb 27, 2009 5:32 pm

WTF? I report a dude who's obviously cheating so someone turns around, takes my thread and accuses me?

by **Royal Panda** on Fri Feb 27, 2009 6:04 pm

F.E.A.R. wrote:WTF? I report a dude who's obviously cheating so someone turns around, takes my thread and accuses me?

Clean your own act up before accusing others then:

Game 4285578 is the only one you have played (still active) with CommanderFox, and this is on his wall:

did that make it necessary to attack my territories when you dont evn have a bonus urself? by F.E.A.R.
on Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:47 am

all im saying is you charged north with your armies when you didnt evn hav mexico yet, but thx for the compliment anyways by F.E.A.R.
on Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:55 am

Sounds like diplomatic discussions to me...
Yet I see no chat in the game itself!

Though I agree it's nowhere near as bad as CaptainRex who seems to be engaging in Secret Diplomacy daily.

by **F.E.A.R.** on Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:25 pm

diplomatic discussions eh? Well maybe you should have considered what he had been writing on my wall.

I hate this I am going to lose
on Fri Feb 20, 2009 8:07 pm

What I meant is I am going to lose against you
on Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:02 pm

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ALL IM SAYING IS THAT I THINK UR GOOD!
on Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:23 pm

if thats secret diplomacy and making treaties then i'll be damned. No I dont know why he started writing stuff on my wall about losing after round 2 and then suicided into me, but this is ridiculous. He sends me suicide notes and I ask him why he commits suicide and now thats "diplomatic discussions"?

by **F.E.A.R.** on Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:28 pm

Rule #2: No secret diplomacy
Any form of diplomatic discussion between opponents must be posted in the game chat in English or in a language that all opponents understand. Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating assaults.

yeah just took this from the post above to prove my point

by **Royal Panda** on Sat Feb 28, 2009 6:53 am

You're talking to him about the game, effectively telling him to stop doing something. That's diplomatic discussions; why not put it in the game chat? No harm in telling him he's an idiot in front of everyone!

And to prove my point I will also take that post:

F.E.A.R. wrote:Rule #2: No secret diplomacy
Any form of diplomatic discussion between opponents must be posted in the game chat in English or in a language that all opponents understand. Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating assaults.

yeah just took this from the post above to prove my point

If you advise someone to stop suiciding you, then that is going to affect what he does in-game, and the other players haven't had a chance to see that. My advice: don't say anything about an on-going game unless you also post it in the game chat.

by **F.E.A.R.** on Sat Feb 28, 2009 9:52 am

No real point there since it can't affect his play seeing as he had already suicided into me and the next turn we were both near eliminated by an actual secret alliance between analseepage69 and captainrex.

by **Royal Panda** on Sat Feb 28, 2009 2:40 pm

F.E.A.R. wrote:No real point there since it can't affect his play seeing as he had already suicided into me and the next turn we were both near eliminated by an actual secret alliance between analseepage69 and captainrex.

I agree with you, you clearly didn't intend to affect the game; when I accused I was looking for people involved with CaptainRex and so was looking around that game, which you were part of, and you seemed suspicious. You're clearly not involved with these guys though. Just don't talk about on-going games on someone else's wall next time to avoid suspicion!