Moderator: Cartographers
haha, just if I have future images and detail that I would like near the front but not necessarily in the first post.the.killing.44 wrote:sounds interesting yet very linear — there's a lot of potential, though. May I ask what those are reserved for?
.44
I knew this idea was familiar to me!Incandenza wrote:2. Go with the skyscraper battle concept. I don't know what the licensing issues are with public buildings, but potentially you could turn the 'hills' into stylized versions of actual distinctive skyscrapers (Empire State Building, Petronas Towers, Sears Tower, Bank of China building in Hong Kong, etc.) with the aforementioned stray continents as 'smaller buildings of note', like a Pyramid or the Taj Mahal. The trick will be finding buildings that can be differentiated chromatically as much as possible, so the map isn't a grayscale wasteland.
sailorseal wrote:My big boy banana was out the whole time
AndyDufresne wrote:Forever linked at the hip's-banana! (That sounds strange, don't quote me.)AndyDufresne wrote:Many Happy Bananas to everyone, lets party...with Bananas.
--Andy
sully800 wrote:The gherkin is a great choice because it is so unique. And quite large as well!
I plan on keeping the drawing 2D, but I will layer some of the buildings with the shorter structures in front. So the Great Pyramid would sit in front of the taller sky scrapers.
And yes, I will place the army circles symmetrically, I just clicked quickly on top of the original picture.
Should I have some cut aways of buildings to show the underlying structure? Perhaps something similar to the unfinished view of Freedom Tower would add engineering interest. I'm somewhat worried about placing the army circles directly on the towers though, so I may move them slightly to the outside in the open air.


natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
I didn't realize they actually started it! That's a project I first heard about in 2005, and I thought it was awesome from the moment I saw it but for some reason I thought it was delayed or still on the drawing boards. It might be tough to include all of these proposed or in progress buildings since the final look and heights are not yet determined (or at least known publicly). Maybe I should do one that includes the tallest and most notable completed buildings and then update to include the throngs or ultra sky scrapers currently in the works.
...and maybe still will be?mibi wrote:This reminds me of the greatest map that never was.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:...and maybe still will be?mibi wrote:This reminds me of the greatest map that never was.