Moderator: Community Team
samuelc812 wrote:We have decided on a Fortnightly Newsletter, but this may change as the Newsletter Develops
samuelc812 wrote:Title: Interesting Thread Reporter
Job Description/Requirements: A Forum Regular who has a general grasp on ALL of the main forums. This person would be required to Report any interesting discussions around the site that the larger CC community would find interesting, and give a brief overview. This includes but is not limited to Announcements, Debates, Heated Discussions, Competitions etc.
The overall aim of the Interesting Thread Reporter is to communicate intresting or important topics currently circulating CC.
samuelc812 wrote:Bumped
Night Strike wrote:samuelc812 wrote:Bumped
No need to do that. Stickified!
Are you going to be the Editor-in-Chief?
Kotaro wrote:Also, what positions are open? All or just some? And would you need editing help, for grammar and spelling checks?
Kotaro wrote:Also, what positions are open? All or just some? And would you need editing help, for grammar and spelling checks?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:Kotaro wrote:Also, what positions are open? All or just some? And would you need editing help, for grammar and spelling checks?
Yeah, that's a good point. I don't know if I have time to write an article every 2 weeks, but I can be an editor and read them over for spelling and grammar errors.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:I think you meant "grammatical errors".
Right about now they are "considering" your offer .
Don't call them; they'll call you.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:TheProwler wrote:I think you meant "grammatical errors".
Right about now they are "considering" your offer .
Don't call them; they'll call you.
I used a noun to modify another noun. It's called a noun adjunct.
Take your ignorance to Flame Wars, please.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
TheProwler wrote:I think I'm going to go.
This place isn't nearly as friendly as I thought it would be.
Kotaro wrote:TheProwler wrote:I think I'm going to go.
This place isn't nearly as friendly as I thought it would be.
*Utters a quick prayer to Owenshooter, thanking him*
I believe at least 1 editor would be nice, Sammy-boy. The reason for this is, A) Spell Checking does not solve everything, and B) Through experience, I've noticed that some writers use words that seem right, when they aren't to other people. It's not the difference between whether or not the word is right, it's what they think is proper usage. Take That last little tif between John and Prowler; Prowler think he's right, John think he's right, and technically, they both can be right, but which word usage is better and more fluent for a paper?
Just a suggestion.
samuelc812 wrote:john9blue - gimil and i have thought a lot about this and we have already decided to let the reporters do their own checking of spelling and grammatical errors Thankyou for your interest however
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
owenshooter wrote:
first, thanks for thanking me... i appreciate it...
secondly, if you are going to blast people on grammar, spell checking, writing and usage. you should learn the difference between think and thinks. as in, "john THINKS he's right", not "john THNK he's right"... good luck with that... and stick around prowler, this isn't such a bad place. i enjoy browsing it, and it seems like it is going to be a cool thing once it gets going. they have some great ideas. and believe it or not, they have ONE EDITOR!!!-0
Kotaro wrote:TheProwler wrote:I think I'm going to go.
This place isn't nearly as friendly as I thought it would be.
*Utters a quick prayer to God, thanking him*
I believe at least 1 editor would be nice, Sammy-boy. The reason for this is, A) Spell Checking does not solve everything, and B) Through experience, I've noticed that some writers use words that seem right, when they aren't to other people. It's not the difference between whether or not the word is right, it's what they think is proper usage. Take That last little tif between John and Prowler; Prowler think he's right, John think he's right, and technically, they both can be right, but which word usage is better and more fluent for a paper?
Just a suggestion.
samuelc812 wrote:Owen, explain to me what would be wrong with one thorough editor
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Users browsing this forum: No registered users