Moderator: Cartographers
Maybe it would be easier to just do this like the medals: Idea, Graphics, xml
WidowMakers wrote:I have a question.
Right now there are 4 categories per map: Idea, Gameplay, Graphics, xml
What if both cartos helped on GP or I. Would they both get teh tag for it?
I mean for 8 Thoughts, Coleman came up with the Idea based off of a board game he saw before. But we both worked on GP. So do we both get the 8 Thoughts: GP or just one of us. I am sure that this will come up from many more maps.
Maybe it would be easier to just do this like the medals: Idea, Graphics, xml
Especially since many people work on GP no one can actually be credited with all of it.
So for 8 Thoughts
Coleman gets: Idea, XML
WidowMakers: GFX.
Thoughts?
by the.killing.44 Ā» Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:14 am
I can work on this after I get out of the car driving for 4-5 hours (if it's not done by then) from VT back to NYC ā¦ kill me now.
But I'll make a list fer ya, qwert. I'll leave it to you to organize it
.44
by edbeard Ā» Sun Jan 04, 2009 1:30 am
problem with going by medals is that they can only give 2 per map unless it's a revamp of classic in which case they have no problem giving more medals for some unknown reason. since we're not bound by the medal [s]idiocy[/s] bureaucracy we should just put out each map based on what actually happened
people are very correct when they say there are four categories: idea, gameplay, graphics, xml
for each map just figure out who did what and in some cases there will be two or more people per section.
for example...
Operation Drug War
idea: edbeard
gameplay: edbeard
graphics: telvannia
xml: edbeard, zimmah
or
Feudal War (this is a guess)
idea: gimil, dim?
gameplay: gimil
graphics: gimil
xml: yeti_c
once you've figured out what happened on each map you can then go through and do the people individually
qwert wrote:Also Idea is change with Draft,we can not put all names-for examle, if you look on that way,we can have 4 people involved in development of map.
First can create whole idea,second can create Graphica,third Gameplay and fourt XMl.
Then everybody need to get credit for that. One person can easy Developed Idea,Gameplay and Graphic,and second can help with XML.
So? If you look at the example I gave a few pages back, the list is sorted by mapmaker, then for each map he's contributed to, it lists what contributions were made. So if Person A did graphics on map 1 and gameplay and graphics on map 2, it would look like:
Person 1
Map 1: Graphics
Map 2: Gameplay and Graphics
qwert wrote:So? If you look at the example I gave a few pages back, the list is sorted by mapmaker, then for each map he's contributed to, it lists what contributions were made. So if Person A did graphics on map 1 and gameplay and graphics on map 2, it would look like:
Person 1
Map 1: Graphics
Map 2: Gameplay and Graphics
These is ok, when you have people who recognise by medals. but i can not add some Map Maker who dont have any map quenched.
I can add these name in Prime Developer list only.
qwert wrote:Well i can add other names,but only in Prime Developer,i can not create Some Map Maker who only have idea,and dont do nothing else-example
-Gimil
Graphic,Gameplay Developer of
1.Feudal War(idea by Dim)
Ofcourse XML going to Yeti_c Letter
Or we can create complex example;
-Gimil
Graphic,Gameplay Developer of
1.Feudal War(idea by Dim,xml by Yeti_c)
-Yeti_c
Xml Developer of
1.Feudal War(gameplay and graphic by Gimil,idea by Dim)
-Dim
Idea Developer of
1.Feudal War(graphic and gameplay by Gimil,xml by Yeti_c)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now these work when all 3 is map maker,but if someon only create idea,then he only can mention in Graphic and XML developer list.
I don't follow what you're saying. Each map can only have 2 people who get medals, but more than 2 people can work. Going off the medals list is not the best way to create your list. What you should do is what Cairns said - look at each map and see whose names are on the map itself, and use those. If you look at the Holy Roman Empire map, for example, Pamoa and Unit_2 got the medal, but Pamoa, Unit_2, and Greyhawke are all listed as developers on the map itself. Using your system, greyhawke would not get the credit he deserves.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
chipv wrote:Bad Speler Idea: Iberia , Arctic ,
Bad Speler Gameplay: Iberia , Arctic ,
Bad Speler Graphics: Iberia , Arctic ,
Bad Speler XML: Iberia , Arctic ,
Balsiefen Idea: Scotland ,
Balsiefen Gameplay: Scotland ,
Balsiefen Graphics:
Balsiefen XML: Scotland
.
.
.
[spoiler=Bad Speler]
Idea: Iberia , Arctic ,
Gameplay: Iberia , Arctic ,
Graphics: Iberia , Arctic ,
XML: Iberia , Arctic ,
[/spoiler][spoiler=Balsiefen]
Idea: Scotland ,
Gameplay: Scotland ,
Graphics:
XML: Scotland
[/spoiler]
Because 6 people worked on it for 14+ hours over night in several shifts to finish it.qwert wrote:When i start Map Maker Index i realy dont think that i will find these thing, for mine point of view Bad thing. Andy say only 2 people can get medal for create map,its ok.
But when i look Classic Art map,i realy can not find things what put these map in first place for developmental dificulty, these map is very simple graphic and gameplay is same like in old Classic.
Well Moderator and CA know best why these map have 5 medal contribution.
WidowMakers wrote:Because 5 people worked on it for 14+ hours over night in several shifts to finish it.
Well 6 thenMrBenn wrote:WidowMakers wrote:Because 5 people worked on it for 14+ hours over night in several shifts to finish it.
I thought there were 6...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users