Conquer Club

[GO] HQ / Capital Game Type

Have any bright ideas? Share and discuss them with the community

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

And don't forget to search for previously suggested ideas first!

[GO] HQ / Capital Game Type

Postby Mauddib28 on Tue Jan 24, 2006 3:21 pm

Ok well Paco, JDV4, MightyMax, and I have been thinking and well, ok actually it was more like just Paco and I but still, the point is we thought wouldn't it be awsome if we could have a risk game where each person had a capital that they placed in one of their countries. The capital would by default have a defensive army (a.k.a. can not attack) of 10. Then like if your capital was captured you could revolt and try to take it back. Also like if you take over a capital the army to who that capital belongs to becomes subservient to you. We still havn't figured out all the bugs in it, but we tried it before wtih 5 players and it went pretty well.

Ideas?
Hatered?
Love?
Stupid?
Don't Care?

Tell us what you think of the idea
User avatar
Private 1st Class Mauddib28
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:21 pm
Location: My Seceret Underground Base

Postby dagreatbroomhead on Tue Jan 24, 2006 3:45 pm

its kind of like the subset game in the directions of risk, where you have to defend, except when you take their capital, you ake everything, troops and all.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class dagreatbroomhead
 
Posts: 453
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 5:02 pm
Location: Maine

Postby JDV4 on Wed Jan 25, 2006 8:43 am

ok Mauddib, first I want to say that the last time we tried that, you all cheated on me, so it didn't go that well. I don know if the Capital thing would work online, cause capitals makes the game shorter and rolling the dice does take long.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class JDV4
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:29 pm

Postby waldo on Wed Jan 25, 2006 12:52 pm

look at dominategame.com there is a nice version of capitals
New Recruit waldo
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:10 pm

Postby Pedronicus on Thu Jan 26, 2006 3:59 pm

Just getting to grips with how this works :oops:
Major Pedronicus
 
Posts: 2080
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:42 pm
Location: Busy not shitting you....

Postby Mauddib28 on Thu Jan 26, 2006 8:41 pm

JDV4 wrote:ok Mauddib, first I want to say that the last time we tried that, you all cheated on me, so it didn't go that well. I don know if the Capital thing would work online, cause capitals makes the game shorter and rolling the dice does take long.


Ok first off we didn't cheat you, we just didn't have the rules set correctly. So THERE! *nahhh* :P
User avatar
Private 1st Class Mauddib28
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 9:21 pm
Location: My Seceret Underground Base

Postby Asterios on Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:14 pm

Capitals would be cool, but if your capital falls you should be out of the game. No "revolt", no taking your capital back because then it's really nothing but a country that you can't attack from.

Also: a capital should have the ability to defend with three dice even when it doesn't have three strength. That'd be a cool little feature to hammer home how defensive it is.
Private Asterios
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:42 pm

HQ Option (Capital Game Type)

Postby john33 on Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:00 pm

this was in the original risk and i was surprised when i didnt see it in here. for those who dont understand here is how i could work

1.on the first turn a player can choose a territory to be their "base"
2.the goal of the game would be to protect your base while destroying the other players bases.
3.the other players dont know your base.
(this rule i think can be altered) once you capture an oppents base you get all of his territorys or they could just become neutral

feel free to give input.
Cadet john33
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:48 pm

Postby AndyDufresne on Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:19 pm

'More Game Types' is currently on Lack's To-Do list. Please check the Suggestions Box before posting.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Postby Kenny_Smooth on Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:30 pm

I think this would be awesome. anyone else agree?


.
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight. It's the size of the fight in the dog." -Knute Rockne

"It is better to know an ugly truth then to suspect a beautiful lie." -Joshua B. Odisher
User avatar
Private Kenny_Smooth
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:00 pm
Location: Southern Michigan

Postby AK_iceman on Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:43 pm

I think it has been rejected already. Stop dragging up super old posts please.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class AK_iceman
 
Posts: 5704
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm

Postby hawkeye on Fri Aug 04, 2006 8:44 pm

awwwwwwww but it looks fun
Cook hawkeye
 
Posts: 2663
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:19 am
Location: RAGGLE FRAGGLE!!!

Postby Kenny_Smooth on Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:00 pm

yeah, it does look fun. maybe if we had enough support we could get it to happen.


.
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight. It's the size of the fight in the dog." -Knute Rockne

"It is better to know an ugly truth then to suspect a beautiful lie." -Joshua B. Odisher
User avatar
Private Kenny_Smooth
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:00 pm
Location: Southern Michigan

Postby autoload on Fri Aug 04, 2006 9:57 pm

Very nice with the 6 month bump!
User avatar
Major autoload
 
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:37 am

Postby wcaclimbing on Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:26 pm

doesnt this belong in suggestions?
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class wcaclimbing
 
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.

Postby Kenny_Smooth on Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:46 pm

umm, i dont know. Ask one of the mods.


.
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight. It's the size of the fight in the dog." -Knute Rockne

"It is better to know an ugly truth then to suspect a beautiful lie." -Joshua B. Odisher
User avatar
Private Kenny_Smooth
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:00 pm
Location: Southern Michigan

Postby reverend_kyle on Sat Aug 05, 2006 3:31 am

cough landgrab cough.
User avatar
Sergeant reverend_kyle
 
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club

Postby DavSav on Sat Aug 05, 2006 8:52 am

Could be fun. I would play
Wrong? You mean like........morally?
Luck is rewarded in the short term, skill is rewarded in the long term
User avatar
Captain DavSav
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 12:08 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Postby MeDeFe on Sat Aug 05, 2006 1:54 pm

one word: option, maybe
ok that's two words but you get the idea.

And I didn't actually bother reading every post, but in case it's still not clear. In a game with capitals you do NOT lose all your armies if you lose your capital. You only lose all your armies on the continent where your capital is.
Armies on other continents remain under your control.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Suggestion: Head Quarters Option

Postby TimTheEnchanter on Sun Dec 10, 2006 10:23 am

At the beginning of the game you have to pick one of your countries that will become your Head Quarters.
Other players will not know where your HQ is located.

When an enemy conquers your HQ you lose and s/he will take all your countries :P
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class TimTheEnchanter
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: South of Caerbannog

Postby KomradeKloininov on Sun Dec 10, 2006 11:56 am

It would be very difficult in the beginning to defend your capital when your areas are spread out. I don't like it because of that. If you made it for only 3 or 4 people it might work though.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class KomradeKloininov
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 10:29 pm
Location: The Great White North

bases

Postby db007 on Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:04 am

I thought a couple of days ago:idea:: Wouldn't it be a good idea to create a new game type, one with bases.
Let's explain, first I want to say that it wasn't my idea.
the game is just like the normal game, BUT at the beginning of each game, everyone gets 1 or 2 random chosen bases.
now the aim of the game is different, you have to conquer the bases of your opponents.
If you're the only one with bases left, you'va won the game!

It looks like a good idea to me but... It's hard to make the game type
Cook db007
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:28 am
Location: Vlissingen, Zeeland

gd

Postby spinwizard on Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:08 am

sounds good
User avatar
Private 1st Class spinwizard
 
Posts: 5016
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 9:52 am

Postby yeti_c on Fri Jan 05, 2007 11:42 am

In the board game of Risk : 2040 (or whatever) I believe this concept is in.

C.
User avatar
Lieutenant yeti_c
 
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am

Suggestion: Capitols

Postby IronE.GLE on Tue Feb 06, 2007 3:40 pm

Capitol Risk anyone?

Each player designates their base country prior to the start of the first move of the game and you get 2 additional armies on that country.

Defensive bonus of +1 to the smallest dice thrown.

Players are still in the game if they lose their own capitol.

To win, a player must aquire all but one enemy capitols plus hold your own capitol.

All capitol games should be played with escalating bonuses to keep games moving.


Thoughts? Additional suggested rules for this game type are welcome as I'm sure I'm not the only one who has played this game type.
There is no luck, only preparation and execution.

Alliances are for the weak, whimpering masses looking for someone to hold their hand through the storm.
User avatar
Lieutenant IronE.GLE
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:11 pm
Location: Kansas

Next

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron