Moderator: Community Team
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
There would have been but dear old Brooksie couldn't spell itPedronicus wrote:there should of been an option for voting for: 'understanding irony'
I agree, spelling mistakes are annoying.oVo wrote:Speeling could be improved, but all things considered the sentiment is rarely difficult to decypher, and even though your/you're and there/their/they're is constantly butchered it's not something that will ever knock the world off of it's axis.
jonesthecurl wrote:I went for "debating", cos I'm heartily sick of watching the same arguments go round and around repeatedly.
I don't much mind if people get heated or insulting, but repeating yourself is dull.
Another thing I don't like is when people keep saying the same thing.
Over and over.
And repeating themselves.
Until you think "Give it a rest! I got the point already!".
I mean, how lame is that? (repeating yourself I mean).
Here are the main points of the news again:
I voted "debating".
I hate people repeating themselves.
oVo wrote:Speeling could be improved, but all things considered the sentiment is rarely difficult to decypher, and even though your/you're and there/their/they're is constantly butchered it's not something that will ever knock the world off of it's axis.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
It is a close tie, but I rather think manners is included in debate. If you have to insult someone, you generally don't have much of a real point.Frigidus wrote:I was torn between manners and debate, but I had to go with the one I care about.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.

TheProwler wrote:Debating.
Has anyone here ever changed his opinion on any issue? It happens all too infrequently.
If you enter a debate without keeping an open mind and being willing to listen to the other side, the debate will suffer. As will you.
Most people here don't seem to realize, or are not able to admit, that their opponents in a debate might have more or different knowledge on a subject. It is this lack of respect for others that really hurts this forum. It is why debates often don't progress and they end up getting personal. It is very frustrating when one makes a valid point, but the other party totally ignores it, or disregards it due to not giving enough effort to understand its meaning and relevance. And with this frustration come anger and things get personal.
This statement has been approved by The Department of Redundancy Dept.jonesthecurl wrote:I went for "debating", cos I'm heartily sick of watching the same arguments go round and around repeatedly.
I don't much mind if people get heated or insulting, but repeating yourself is dull.
Another thing I don't like is when people keep saying the same thing.
Over and over.
And repeating themselves.
Until you think "Give it a rest! I got the point already!".
I mean, how lame is that? (repeating yourself I mean).
Here are the main points of the news again:
I voted "debating".
I hate people repeating themselves.
Not really the point.jonesthecurl wrote:Prowler, your post was interesting.
But long.
I would like to extract the most pertinent point from it.
All you people who post incessantly in thread after thread-
When was the last time you changed your mind because of something another CCer said?
If "never" what is the point of posting?
if "today" how firm were your beliefs?
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
Pedronicus wrote:there should of been an option for voting for: 'understanding irony'

Hi meggy!btownmeggy wrote:Manners.
Duh.