Auto Foe for Multi's

[yeti_c]

Concise description:

• If someone on your foe list is busted with another multi - then the multi automatically gets added to your foe list.

This will improve the following aspects of the site:

• Prevent multi's you already Foe from playing you again.

[jiminski]

good idea.... don't the multi's get banned though....

[Jeff Hardy]

good idea.... don't the multi's get banned though....

they can buy back their account...
i assume thats what this is about

[lt.pie]

good idea.... don't the multi's get banned though....

and shouldn't they be unable to complete there games ? this (finish off your games and move along )crap is a weak stance by the admin among other things like (buy back in for cheaters) and no score reset with a complimentary medal reset too!

[jiminski]

good idea.... don't the multi's get banned though....

they can buy back their account...
i assume thats what this is about

i see .. it is in case you do not have the first made account on your foe.

sensible

[PLAYER57832]

I like it.

I doubt we will ever solve the full issue, but every bit helps.

[yeti_c]

I like it.

I doubt we will ever solve the full issue, but every bit helps.

Coupled with the "can't join foed players games" feature - It would help too.

C.

[PLAYER57832]

I still like the label cheaters idea (maybe because I posted it ).

but I like these ideas, also.

[Thezzaruz]

good idea.... don't the multi's get banned though....

and shouldn't they be unable to complete there games ? this (finish off your games and move along )crap is a weak stance by the admin among other things like (buy back in for cheaters) and no score reset with a complimentary medal reset too!

In general I agree with you but allowing them to finish of started games is probably the easiest thing to do as having them deadbeat or being pulled completely would upset the games they are in quite much. Have no problem with them being purged from existence as soon as any games are finished though.


To the OP, good idea.

[Jeff Hardy]

good idea.... don't the multi's get banned though....

and shouldn't they be unable to complete there games ? this (finish off your games and move along )crap is a weak stance by the admin among other things like (buy back in for cheaters) and no score reset with a complimentary medal reset too!

In general I agree with you but allowing them to finish of started games is probably the easiest thing to do as having them deadbeat or being pulled completely would upset the games they are in quite much. Have no problem with them being purged from existence as soon as any games are finished though.


To the OP, good idea.

but if you let them play they often suicide the person who reported them or win the game and gain points (=other players lose points)

[Ditocoaf]

I like the idea, but could you please, please remove the apostrophe from the title?

[yeti_c]

I like the idea, but could you please, please remove the apostrophe from the title?

No...

"Multi" is short for "Multiple Account" - and therefore the ' is showing the abbreviation.

C.

[KoE_Sirius]

I still like the label cheaters idea (maybe because I posted it ).

but I like these ideas, also.

I don't think all multis are cheats.
I do think this is a good idea,but the only way they can do this is to use an IP address to block a multi.So those sharing a PC in a college etc will also be excluded I presume.
If I am wrong then its a brilliant idea.

[Timminz]

I like it.

I doubt we will ever solve the full issue, but every bit helps.

Coupled with the "can't join foed players games" feature - It would help too.

C.

Best double-suggestion ever! Both of these things should be implemented immediately.

[Ditocoaf]

I like the idea, but could you please, please remove the apostrophe from the title?

No...

"Multi" is short for "Multiple Account" - and therefore the ' is showing the abbreviation.

C.

Multi is generally a slang word, not a contraction, though. We don't say that so-and-so is a Multi'. We say they're a multi.

But then again I'm not sure about that. As long as this isn't just another mistake of apostrophe in a plural, I'm okay. I didn't think you'd be the sort to do that.