why is that Yeti.. is it a territory description problem or positional?yeti_c wrote:FWIW - as stated in other threads around here - this won't work properly anyway.
C.
classic map solution
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Re: classic map solution
Re: classic map solution
Any XML you may find won't be processed by the server - so the army images - will always come out of the server with the correct XML.jiminski wrote:why is that Yeti.. is it a territory description problem or positional?yeti_c wrote:FWIW - as stated in other threads around here - this won't work properly anyway.
C.
Thus your army counts will be in the wrong place.
The Territoty descriptions in drop downs and log *could* be overriden with the correct code.
You *could* create your own army counts using the XML that you have - but they will look ugly. (and of course you will need to remove the current army counts)...
BOB won't be picking up the correct XML - so that won't work. (and I'm not changing it)
Also - the way I see it - if you do all of this stuff - and Hasbro (or whoever has attacked the site with lawyers) see it - then they are more likely to attempt to shut CC down - which in my eyes is a bad thing... - So in summary - I would leave well alone.
C.

Highest score : 2297
-
Jeff Hardy
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 10:22 am
- Location: Matt Hardy's account, you can play against me there
Re: classic map solution
i dont get it...yeti_c wrote:Any XML you may find won't be processed by the server - so the army images - will always come out of the server with the correct XML.jiminski wrote:why is that Yeti.. is it a territory description problem or positional?yeti_c wrote:FWIW - as stated in other threads around here - this won't work properly anyway.
C.
Thus your army counts will be in the wrong place.
The Territoty descriptions in drop downs and log *could* be overriden with the correct code.
You *could* create your own army counts using the XML that you have - but they will look ugly. (and of course you will need to remove the current army counts)...
BOB won't be picking up the correct XML - so that won't work. (and I'm not changing it)
Also - the way I see it - if you do all of this stuff - and Hasbro (or whoever has attacked the site with lawyers) see it - then they are more likely to attempt to shut CC down - which in my eyes is a bad thing... - So in summary - I would leave well alone.
C.
wouldnt this just be like an image thats goes over classic shapes?
you wouldnt have to change the whereabouts of the territs
Re: classic map solution
I am more concerned for the moment with the fact that you think it is not possible... really, honestly?yeti_c wrote:Any XML you may find won't be processed by the server - so the army images - will always come out of the server with the correct XML.jiminski wrote:why is that Yeti.. is it a territory description problem or positional?yeti_c wrote:FWIW - as stated in other threads around here - this won't work properly anyway.
C.
Thus your army counts will be in the wrong place.
The Territoty descriptions in drop downs and log *could* be overriden with the correct code.
You *could* create your own army counts using the XML that you have - but they will look ugly. (and of course you will need to remove the current army counts)...
BOB won't be picking up the correct XML - so that won't work. (and I'm not changing it)
Also - the way I see it - if you do all of this stuff - and Hasbro (or whoever has attacked the site with lawyers) see it - then they are more likely to attempt to shut CC down - which in my eyes is a bad thing... - So in summary - I would leave well alone.
C.
And I can't see that there is a problem with site and legal culpability. That would be like holding the internet provider accountable for P2P streaming.
Anyway let's end this endeavour to be sure.
- hammocksleeper
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 4:11 pm
Re: classic map solution
How do you know someone attacked the site with lawyers? Did lack tell you this?yeti_c wrote:Also - the way I see it - if you do all of this stuff - and Hasbro (or whoever has attacked the site with lawyers)
Re: classic map solution
I know nothing - It is merely an assumption...hammocksleeper wrote:How do you know someone attacked the site with lawyers? Did lack tell you this?yeti_c wrote:Also - the way I see it - if you do all of this stuff - and Hasbro (or whoever has attacked the site with lawyers)
C.

Highest score : 2297
Re: classic map solution
If someone actually makes this script I want to be on the mailing list 
- Stephan Wayne
- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 6:20 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: EAST TN
Re: classic map solution
send me a copy to
the new classic sucks
the new classic sucks
