Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
krusher wrote:Be sure before you accuse someone!
Accused:
xxtig12683xx
ktess920
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Game number(s):
Game 3284968
Comments:
They have openly admitted to being brothers, although this alone is not enough to evidence convince that they are guilty of secret alliance it should make every one unease to play brothers in a standard freestyle (as every one tends to let friends or family member win rather then other players)
When I learned that they were brothers I was unease but still I played on. what gave them away was in round 11 I set up to kill ktess920, and xxtig12683xx was blocking me with a few troops in middle east, I asked him to move and he instead deployed more troops on middle east to block me from killing his brother. After his brother (ktess) auto attacked me with his remaining troops thus weakening me and weakening him self so that xxtig could kill his brother and get his cards instead of me or silent sailor.
The bottom line is they blocked for each other and gave away cards to each other when it was apparent that one of them was going to be eliminated. this is a typical secret diplomacy tactic for one player to suicide into the others and let his friend or in this case his brother eliminate him and take his cards, giving the "cheater" a obvious advantage over every one.
This is not their first game that they have played together, they are routinely playing doubles and standard games with each other (22 games in total) in my opinion they should at least be blocked from playing each other since they are family members and the urge to help each other is so obvious even if they don't openly help each other I'm sure that they would much rather having one of them win then both of them lose which is what happened in this game. The only reason why they lost is because i had enough troops to weaken both of them thus giving the 4th player (silent sailor) the advantage over them.
Game: 3284968
2008-09-17 17:56:07 - krusher: how do you know his name?
2008-09-17 17:56:20 - xxtig12683xx: hes my brother
2008-09-17 17:56:44 - krusher: thats nice... and when were you gona tell us this?
2008-09-17 17:56:59 - xxtig12683xx: we dont have to tell you were brothers
2008-09-17 17:57:35 - ktess920: yeah f*ck that bullshit
king achilles wrote:Just for the record, I checked if they are multis and they are not. For a secret diplomacy, I can only note this report for the meantime. Since they have been openly exposed in this report as being brothers, people can judge for themselves if they are having a secret alliance in any of their current games they are in together. Blocking them based on this game alone and for being brothers is not enough. We need more games with strong evidence of suspicious moves other than this.
xxtig12683xx wrote:king achilles wrote:Just for the record, I checked if they are multis and they are not. For a secret diplomacy, I can only note this report for the meantime. Since they have been openly exposed in this report as being brothers, people can judge for themselves if they are having a secret alliance in any of their current games they are in together. Blocking them based on this game alone and for being brothers is not enough. We need more games with strong evidence of suspicious moves other than this.
nothing suspicious even took place...i out played that poor sap krusher and he was pissed![]()
thanks though, appreciate the swift response![]()
whump and narki thanks for the comments, your opinions really carried water.
-tig
krusher wrote:xxtig12683xx wrote:king achilles wrote:Just for the record, I checked if they are multis and they are not. For a secret diplomacy, I can only note this report for the meantime. Since they have been openly exposed in this report as being brothers, people can judge for themselves if they are having a secret alliance in any of their current games they are in together. Blocking them based on this game alone and for being brothers is not enough. We need more games with strong evidence of suspicious moves other than this.
nothing suspicious even took place...i out played that poor sap krusher and he was pissed![]()
thanks though, appreciate the swift response![]()
whump and narki thanks for the comments, your opinions really carried water.
-tig
He didn't clear you... and instead of bashing people why don't you just reply with your "side" of the story instead of trying to put down the people accusing you with immature name calling like "sap"..... the abscence of evidence is not the same as the evidence of abscence, its just a matter of time before more people realize what you are doign and come forward. as for me I have a life and don't have time to go look up your other games so I will only give testemonial to the game we played together but I'm sure there are more shady games that you are involved in with your brother, its only a matter of time buddy, so make your rude jokes while you can but we both know your cheating habits iwill catch up to you one of these days.
hiddendragon wrote:Tess, you dirty rotten cheat they got you this time MUHAHAhaha!!!! j/k, anyone who knows tess knows he wants to win I have never seen him do anything cheap to do so and as his rank proves he doesn't win all the time...Tess is scrappy and wouldn't sacrifice a game to his own dieing mother...I do hope he starts sacrificing them to me because I'm sick of the bastard stealing my points...I'd be the freaking conquerer if it weren't for dirty bastards like Tess...krusher, I've not known you as a gripper and am certain that it may have felt as if the brothers were dumping on you but I know tess wouldn't throw a game so his brother could win...I would believe him making a secret alliance to beat his brother but not the other way around...Tess, even though I doubt you cheating I still think your an ugly bastard...
wrestler1ump wrote:xxxtigxxx just sent me a PM saying he was sure he wouldn't be caught.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users