Spankers Corner [TSM]

by **Frop** on Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:02 pm

RiskTycoon wrote:better be careful... the Goons are damn good I tell ya....

They don't look particularly menacing, but I love the mullets.

by **General Mojo** on Mon Sep 08, 2008 1:11 pm

I would have to say....if i were ever in the market for a clan, the monkis would be on the top of my wish list...

just giving props where props are due

by **nesterdude** on Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:34 pm

Frop wrote:
RiskTycoon wrote:better be careful... the Goons are damn good I tell ya....

They don't look particularly menacing, but I love the mullets.

Hey that's me on the left!

by **jiminski** on Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:24 pm

Marv. Why is this not in the Challenge Sub Forum?

by **jiminski** on Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:36 pm

jiminski wrote:Marv. Why is this not in the Challenge Sub Forum?

Monki's have accepted Clan Challenge from The Imperial Dragoons!

jiminski wrote:Marv. Why is this not in the Challenge Sub Forum?

by **jiminski** on Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:45 pm

This is where people challenge us, so it should be in that forum please Marv.

by **MarVal** on Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:33 am

Its been moved, where it should be :-)

Grtz
MarVal

by **jiminski** on Sun Sep 21, 2008 5:46 am

top man!

by **Frop** on Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:24 am

by **jiminski** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:59 am

clan challenge

Sent at: Sat May 10, 2008 11:38 pm
From: hwhrhett
To: jiminski
i know that yall are currently in a challenge with low, however the imperial dragoons would like to issue a challenge for when you guys are done. shoot me a pm back. or hit me up on xxxxxxxxx@hotmail.com.

good luck on your current challenge, although i doubt that it is needed.

Cordial Challenge finally accepted from the Dragoons, post previous battle with LOW.

Monki's v Dragoons Clan Challenge will be as follows:

Based upon Map list at the front of Spankers Corner (with a couple of Quad exceptions being finalised)
Best of 60 Matches

25 dubs
Dragoons (15 Dubs)
Monki Dubs (10 Dubs)

25 Trips
Dragoons (10 trips)
Monkis (15 Trips)

Quads
Dragoons (5 Quads)
Monkis (5 Quads)

by **firstholliday** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:25 pm

yup...

they chickened out Jim...

by **hwhrhett** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:43 pm

firstholliday wrote:yup...

they chickened out Jim...

yes, we chickened out when you guys refused to join games that you didnt like.

by **hulmey** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:45 pm

hwhrhett wrote:
firstholliday wrote:yup...

they chickened out Jim...

yes, we chickened out when you guys refused to join games that you didnt like.

games such as?

by **hwhrhett** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:47 pm

hulmey wrote:
hwhrhett wrote:
firstholliday wrote:yup...

they chickened out Jim...

yes, we chickened out when you guys refused to join games that you didnt like.

games such as?

there is a list on the front page of their thread, which apparantly they are strict to.

edit: the deal breaker here was that they agreed to make exceptions but blatantly refuse to play anything with unlimited forts.

by **jiminski** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:00 pm

hwhrhett wrote:
hulmey wrote:
hwhrhett wrote:
firstholliday wrote:yup...

they chickened out Jim...

yes, we chickened out when you guys refused to join games that you didnt like.

games such as?

there is a list on the front page of their thread, which apparantly they are strict to.

edit: the deal breaker here was that they agreed to make exceptions but blatantly refuse to play anything with unlimited forts.

I can not speak for Lucky who was doing the parley for us.

But i thought that the exceptions were: A Feudal Doubles, and a Conquerman and Pearl Harbour Quad.
And that we were in negotiation on whether the Feudal could be an AOM.

maybe communication has not found quite the same interpretation on both sides.

by **Frop** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:08 pm

Yes, it's true. We admit it. We play normal settings and maps to give us an unfair advantage.

by **hwhrhett** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:15 pm

Frop wrote:Yes, it's true. We admit it. We play normal settings and maps to give us an unfair advantage.

normal is relative tho. since all these maps are a part of cc and many have been here for years, are they not normal?

by **Frop** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 5:21 pm

hwhrhett wrote:
Frop wrote:Yes, it's true. We admit it. We play normal settings and maps to give us an unfair advantage.

normal is relative tho. since all these maps are a part of cc and many have been here for years, are they not normal?

If you cut me, do I not bleed?

Actually I was referring to stuff like the thread on Map Complexity.

by **jiminski** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 6:53 pm

Not sure how we even got into an argument here. All excellent fun for the impartial observer and dissenters i am sure.

Anyway, our maps and settings are on the front page of this very thread.
Please take a look prior to making a challenge. We are trying out some of the more complex gameplay maps and will keep broadening our horizons.

But we play what we play.

by **nesterdude** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:04 pm

Sorry to bring this into your thread, but since you're already talking...
Unlimited forts is a standard in challenges, as Freestyle is a standard NO
It's like saying you can't play classic map.
Sorry, but uhm it is.

by **jiminski** on Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:06 pm

nesterdude wrote:Sorry to bring this into your thread, but since you're already talking...
Unlimited forts is a standard in challenges, as Freestyle is a standard NO
It's like saying you can't play classic map.
Sorry, but uhm it is.

just drop it please Nester. i happy that the challenge is not going forward.