--Andy
Moderator: Cartographers
my deepest apologies if I was the cause of any more holdups for the 'NEW' mapsAndyDufresne wrote:Repassed.
--Andy

give me five minuteslackattack wrote:The xml link is no good anymore
But why can't they just keep it up? Weird if you ask me, unless it takes up memory or something.edbeard wrote:I think you need a download every [insert length of time] for it to stay up.
ok here it is from sendspace..."A file becomes inactive if it has not been downloaded at least once during a 14 day period"

They have a premium service... if you pay you get to keep files up indefinitely.Gilligan wrote:But why can't they just keep it up? Weird if you ask me, unless it takes up memory or something.edbeard wrote:I think you need a download every [insert length of time] for it to stay up.
ok here it is from sendspace..."A file becomes inactive if it has not been downloaded at least once during a 14 day period"

ssshhhh. I've noticed a couple other things too but these are very minor and I don't think they'll cause trouble. Plus, since Telvannia is the only one who can really fix these things (he has the original files), it's a bit of a hassle to fix it.Gilligan wrote:There is a missing . in D.A. in the Objective part on top
Nah, they won't cause trouble. I'm just nit pickyedbeard wrote:ssshhhh. I've noticed a couple other things too but these are very minor and I don't think they'll cause trouble. Plus, since Telvannia is the only one who can really fix these things (he has the original files), it's a bit of a hassle to fix it.Gilligan wrote:There is a missing . in D.A. in the Objective part on top
maybe at a later date.


i agree it appears some areas are darker and it makes the territory names difficult to read..t.e.c wrote:this looks like an interesting map, but the graphics are horrible. it looks as though it's out of focus or something..