just wondering, but what would qualify as a "Large Team" tournament?
Just wondering if my Foundry Update Special fits that bill.
1/2 players on cairnswk side, 1/2 players on WidowMakers Side, but they only play members of the opposite team, and when the sides are uneven (do to one side winning more games) players get by's so they will never play eachother until one side is completely whipped out.
HoF clarification
Moderator: Tournament Directors
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- Natewolfman
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:37 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: omaha, NE
Re: HoF clarification
I think it does. As long as there's a 'large team'.
I was curious though if it would still be considered a large team if only one person wins.
I was curious though if it would still be considered a large team if only one person wins.

- Natewolfman
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:37 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: omaha, NE
Re: HoF clarification
I duno, its kind of a grey area... like, the conquerer of conquer club tournament, 5 player teams play togeather in quads, doubles, triples, singles, but at the end when a group is found winner, they play eachother to find the true winner, but im sure that would be large teamGilligan wrote:I think it does. As long as there's a 'large team'.
I was curious though if it would still be considered a large team if only one person wins.
Re: HoF clarification
That's what went through my mind last night in the update.Natewolfman wrote:I duno, its kind of a grey area... like, the conquerer of conquer club tournament, 5 player teams play togeather in quads, doubles, triples, singles, but at the end when a group is found winner, they play eachother to find the true winner, but im sure that would be large teamGilligan wrote:I think it does. As long as there's a 'large team'.
I was curious though if it would still be considered a large team if only one person wins.

- Night Strike
- Posts: 8509
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: HoF clarification
I moved this here b/c of gilligan's slip-up comment in the post above this.
Anywho, Nate, I think that 5 person team one would count as Large Team.
Anywho, Nate, I think that 5 person team one would count as Large Team.
- Natewolfman
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:37 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: omaha, NE
Re: HoF clarification
i would guess until they announce us, aye?Gilligan wrote:Slip-Up? That part was confidential?![]()
though that may not be so bad since its general knowledge that gilligan was helping with HoF before this was done with us
- Night Strike
- Posts: 8509
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: HoF clarification
Technically, all the public knows is that Gilligan added the URLs for OP. I'm going to try to put together an announcement within the week.
- Natewolfman
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:37 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: omaha, NE
Re: HoF clarification
cool, thanks NS, I know we are causeing some more work then helping at this momentNight Strike wrote:Technically, all the public knows is that Gilligan added the URLs for OP. I'm going to try to put together an announcement within the week.
Re: HoF clarification
Got that right!Natewolfman wrote:cool, thanks NS, I know we are causeing some more work then helping at this momentNight Strike wrote:Technically, all the public knows is that Gilligan added the URLs for OP. I'm going to try to put together an announcement within the week.but some time and we will pick it up and the three of us (gozar, gilligan and myself) will be a well oiled machine


