I think you might have stretched the metaphor a little too far.got tonkaed wrote:the troubling thing is, by the time one goes to collect the ball, you realize you are staring at an entire lawn of balls, all made at half cost and rated higher by focus groups because of their adaptability in design and performance.Neoteny wrote:Particularly after intentionally throwing the ball over the fence in the first place.got tonkaed wrote:While i understand the appeal and even think they argue rather consistently from within the framework, i question how anyone can really believe taking ones ball and going home is an appropriate way to deal with the current world system.
Liberalism for Britain is a no!
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
-
Snorri1234
- Posts: 3438
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
- Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
- Contact:
Re: Liberalism for Britain is a no!
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."
Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
-
brianrogers
- Posts: 0
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 7:16 am
Re: Liberalism for Britain is a no!
Hear the man out!brianrogers wrote:Balls.
-
MeDeFe
- Posts: 7831
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
- Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.
Re: Liberalism for Britain is a no!
He's talking ballshit.Frigidus wrote:Hear the man out!brianrogers wrote:Balls.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.