Next generation consoles

vtmarik · Post by **vtmarik** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:38 pm

FRSmk3 wrote:If there was anything that had to do with Pinata's for the wii, I would expect to be able to swing the controller at the pinata and kill it. Sounds like a good excuse for a Wario-Ware minigame, though.

Don't be surprised if it's in there. I mean, one of the minigames has you doing squats for god's sake.

Skittlesandmnms · Post by **Skittlesandmnms** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:40 am

vtmarik wrote:
FRSmk3 wrote:If there was anything that had to do with Pinata's for the wii, I would expect to be able to swing the controller at the pinata and kill it. Sounds like a good excuse for a Wario-Ware minigame, though.
Don't be surprised if it's in there. I mean, one of the minigames has you doing squats for god's sake.

although nintendo pwnz... some of the wario stuff is dumb

ps. nice new avatar VT grr and zim are awesome

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 2:30 am

wcaclimbing wrote:i wasnt talking to him only. i was talking to everyone who is like
"ooh! that games graphics are soooooo good. i am going to buy the PS3 just becuase the demo of the game at walmart looked so realistic that i forgot where i was for a few minutes"
edited my earlier post.

Well no, but the ps3 has made the lamest games cool and fun so you know...

I'd rather play that than one with shitty graphics.. I think the wii and ps3 are both going to kick ass and intend on buying both... the xbox however eats loads of shit.

Ham · Post by **Ham** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:10 pm

Did I ever say get the game because it has good graphics and thats it. Like the new gundam game. It may look pretty good but from the reveiws its gotten I now know its just like all the others. It sucks.

vtmarik · Post by **vtmarik** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:13 pm

Ham wrote:Did I ever say get the game because it has good graphics and thats it. Like the new gundam game. It may look pretty good but from the reveiws its gotten I now know its just like all the others. It sucks.

No, but you are slamming the Wii based on its graphical capabilities.

sfhbballnut · Post by **sfhbballnut** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 7:05 pm

And graphiics really don't matter that much

Ham · Post by **Ham** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:18 pm

I never said I dont like the Wii. I just think that theres more to the PS3 than just graphics. I like the Wii I just dont feel its the best Console.

Still better than Xbox bleh.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:22 pm

Ham wrote:I never said I dont like the Wii. I just think that theres more to the PS3 than just graphics. I like the Wii I just dont feel its the best Console.

Still better than Xbox bleh.

1. ps3
2. wii
3. xbox 360

xbox 360=ps2>gamecube<wii<ps3>ps2

vtmarik · Post by **vtmarik** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:30 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:1. ps3
2. wii
3. xbox 360

xbox 360=ps2>gamecube<wii<ps3>ps2

X360 is equal to PS2, which is greater than the gamecube, which is less than the wii which is less than the ps3 which is greater than the ps2

X360=PS2 which may or may not equal the Wii?

Sammy gags · Post by **Sammy gags** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:35 pm

wii is amazing, the only thing is that it has all those arcade Nintendo games, but Madden 07 was amazing with the controllers

Skittlesandmnms · Post by **Skittlesandmnms** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:36 pm

ill have to try that. madden 07 looked sweet but i havent gotten the chance to try it yet

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:29 pm

i have it for the 360. i really like it, but they had to take out a lot of features that were in the regular XBOX version. that's the problem w/ nxt gen, is that they (microsoft, sony) spend too much time worrying about graphics.

but, i must say, they are very pretty graphics

Skittlesandmnms · Post by **Skittlesandmnms** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:34 pm

hehe go Wii. more time on plot. less on graphics.

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 10:37 pm

yes, i really want a wii, but it's not a top priority. the reason i got the 360 was because i wanted sports games, and the Gamecube barely had any, so i went w/ the system i knew would

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 11:02 pm

vtmarik wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:1. ps3
2. wii
3. xbox 360

xbox 360=ps2>gamecube<wii<ps3>ps2
X360 is equal to PS2, which is greater than the gamecube, which is less than the wii which is less than the ps3 which is greater than the ps2

X360=PS2 which may or may not equal the Wii?

I was wondering if someone would catch that...

wii>xbox360

sfhbballnut · Post by **sfhbballnut** » Mon Nov 27, 2006 4:20 pm

no questioning that

FRSmk3 · Post by **FRSmk3** » Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:11 pm

You can tell a lot about a game system beforehand by looking at the history of the company that made it.

Nintendo has been selling many successful consoles, trying to get their fans the best they could offer. Also, this is the only company in the running with a great history in durability. Counting the DS in this, you've seen the innovation they put in their design. It has the potential to be great, or absolutely terrible, depending on how the games are made. Watch out for that.

Microsoft based their entire first system on graphics and Halo. (face it, most of the other games were ports, or reasons for you to spend more money.)

Sony has a decent system, but they seem to be more interested in other entertainment devices, built into the system (DVD, MP3... stuff like that). As for whether or not it will be good for gaming, It seems like a gamble to me.

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:27 pm

each system is for different crowds. 360 is for those who want a middle priced system and fairly good graphics and HALO. PS3 is for those who want an expensive system with awesome graphics and other things, such as a BLu- Ray player. the Wii is for those who want a cheap system with ok graphics and a new way to play video games

sfhbballnut · Post by **sfhbballnut** » Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:28 pm

you forgot good game play, the Wii is all over that

wcaclimbing · Post by **wcaclimbing** » Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:44 pm

and the "its so different its awesome" factor

edmundomcpot · Post by **edmundomcpot** » Mon Nov 27, 2006 6:57 pm

after about a year the wii want bein doing so well because youll have to pay to play games normally..with the classic attachment

+ all ideas to do with original uses for things to do with the wii-mote will be gone by then(maybe 2 years)

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:16 am

P Gizzle wrote:each system is for different crowds. 360 is for those who want a middle priced system and fairly good graphics and HALO. PS3 is for those who want an expensive system with awesome graphics and other things, such as a BLu- Ray player. the Wii is for those who want a cheap system with ok graphics and a new way to play video games

Umm the ps3 has the "new way to play video games"

it has motion sensability too.

shultz · Post by **shultz** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:17 pm

I think ps3 is still tops, wii is cool but iam a sit on my ass and play till i get flat ass syndrome(as my mother puts it) from playing all day.

P Gizzle · Post by **P Gizzle** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:21 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:
P Gizzle wrote:each system is for different crowds. 360 is for those who want a middle priced system and fairly good graphics and HALO. PS3 is for those who want an expensive system with awesome graphics and other things, such as a BLu- Ray player. the Wii is for those who want a cheap system with ok graphics and a new way to play video games

Umm the ps3 has the "new way to play video games"

it has motion sensability too.

yes, but it still has the same controller that's what i meant when i said that.

shultz · Post by **shultz** » Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:27 pm

I've read some post that trash the ps systems for breaking down alot.
well i bought the ps2 when it firts came out, and i still play it to this day.
its very inportant to keep it clean(fan,lens,ect) if you take care if it, it will last.

Next generation consoles

which is best?