Moderator: Cartographers
If you mean South Australia and Victoria, I agree.Hoff wrote:west australia and south australia look very similar in color...

What consitutes a medium continent? As far as I'm concerned, there's 2 large, 3 medium and 1 small. I could attempt to take one from another state and add it to New South Wales, making one with 6.Marvaddin wrote:If you mean South Australia and Victoria, I agree.Hoff wrote:west australia and south australia look very similar in color...
I know why South Australia is given a higher bonus. But dont you think, again, the Victoria area is too strong? 4 minor continents and 2 big ones, no much interesting from begginning. So Victoria can waste 2 of those other small continents... and taking S Australia, 9 countries, 3 borders only, bonus of 6!![]()
Only to mention, I still feel the lack of a medium cont.

No I think Victoria is fine, victoria is green. While west and south australia are both a yellowish color. One slightly more orange then the other. I think fiddling around with the shading should make the difference more noticable. Or ifyou can fix it, maybe move the colors around so that they arent next to each other.Marvaddin wrote:If you mean South Australia and Victoria, I agree.Hoff wrote:west australia and south australia look very similar in color...
ttocs wrote:Two things I don't like two much are;
Alice Springs, it makes it too easy to seize the map and its continent, mabye divide the springs into two, then increase the bonus of the northern territory, or just decrease the bonus of western australia by one.
Queensland should either be a bonus of four, have a territory added, or separate Brisbane and Western Downs, because they are to easy to get, esspecially when they are together.
I'm very restricted here by the natural borders in place, but how about removing Hobart from Victoria and making it a continent (the state of Tasmania) all by itself with a bonus of 1? No bonus at all? It's the only way I can think of to reduce the power of Victoria. I dont' know, opinions?Marvaddin wrote:I know why South Australia is given a higher bonus. But dont you think, again, the Victoria area is too strong? 4 minor continents and 2 big ones, no much interesting from begginning. So Victoria can waste 2 of those other small continents... and taking S Australia, 9 countries, 3 borders only, bonus of 6! Shocked

I was trying to reflect the climate of the land and mix in a bit of state colours.gavin_sidhu wrote:did you mean to put similar coloured continents next to each other, or was that more at random? If it was random, maybe swap the continent colours to fix peoples confustion.

Sorry, I don't understand your comments. The mountains block any attack route between Adelaide and Broken Hill. Adelaide cannot attack Western Downs.cowshrptrn wrote:It hink you have WAAY too many boundaries in this map. I suggest shortening the mountains so it only blocks Western Downs- Adelaide and allows for adelaide-broken hill.
I agree with the comments about the clutter, but I can't do much with it that would make any difference. If I give it a different name, it might help. My suggestions would be Eureka or Bendigo, nothing else in that region is short enough to fit.Marvaddin wrote:The region with Mt Gambier, Adelaide, Grampians and Melbourne is a bit crowded... for example, Grampians looks like Mt. Gambier name, at 1st sight. Maybe you can change some borders, to add more room to some territories. Coober Pedy has many wasted space you could use to give Adelaide, and so make Mt Gambier bigger, etc.
If you dislike the way of the old splitted map, why are continents borders giving them aspect of puzzle pieces? And maybe you can reduce the aura around Australia Wink