Conquer Club

the [No Form]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]

the [No Form]

Postby McArthur2 on Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:42 pm

by

PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!
Re: Game #

[b]The accused are suspected of:
[x]
[b]Game number(s):[]
Last edited by McArthur2 on Fri Jun 13, 2008 8:22 am, edited 4 times in total.
Colonel McArthur2
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 12:59 am

Re: therealbaron & lardingd

Postby SirSebstar on Tue Jun 03, 2008 2:08 pm

I don't think they are multies.(even though you did not claim them to be)
First of they are from different countries.

Second it's an no cards game, in which the only good strategy is to go for a small bonus, or do not move at all.

thirdly, they never ever played another game together. meaning, they had no reason to trust eachother from the getgo and gamechat is not really buzzing between the both of them.
Frankly, I think you brought a little suspusion and nothing of substance to the table.

Sorry, but I do not agree with your assesment
Image
User avatar
Major SirSebstar
 
Posts: 6969
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:51 am
Location: SirSebstar is BACK. Highscore: Colonel Score: 2919 21/03/2011

Re: therealbaron & lardingd

Postby lardingd on Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:02 pm

you know when it's your turn and you don't move but write in the chat like you did, it's no surprise you went to accuse me of cheating.

Think about it a little, you have all but 1 territory in the americas, if blue hits me in aulstralia, it paves the way for you to win with almost no issue, my thoughts is he didn't like it, and moved to keep a chance of winning, leaving 1s there as a sign of trust against you.

Your accusation just seems to read "they were supposed to bash each other but didn't, not fair"

I don't cheat and the accusation pisses me off
Sergeant lardingd
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:19 pm

Re: therealbaron & lardingd

Postby McArthur2 on Tue Jun 03, 2008 5:36 pm

The issue is not that Blue moved now. It is that you and he built up armies in Australia during the rest of the game obviously knowing that you would not attack each other. Why did you continue to deploy in Australia when the real baron had overwhelming numbers in Indonesia? You knew he would not attack you.
Colonel McArthur2
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 12:59 am

Re: therealbaron & lardingd

Postby lardingd on Tue Jun 03, 2008 6:32 pm

Because it seemed clear to me at the time he was waiting for an overwhelming majority since once he had a gap of 8 he still didn't attack, and he also didn't do anything to help whenever I tried to stop you from expanding, so I went screw it, I'll just keep deploying there too.
Sergeant lardingd
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 12:19 pm

Re: therealbaron & lardingd

Postby SirSebstar on Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:35 am

and in a no cards game thats a valid tactic
do a chicken run and you will see what i mean
User avatar
Major SirSebstar
 
Posts: 6969
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:51 am
Location: SirSebstar is BACK. Highscore: Colonel Score: 2919 21/03/2011

Re: the [No Form]

Postby lancehoch on Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:01 pm

This thread has not had the form filled out for over 5 months. Because of this, it was becoming clutter at the bottom of the C&A forum. It has been moved to the Closed Reports forum. If you would like to have this looked at, please fill out the form and it will be returned to the main C&A forum.
Sergeant lancehoch
 
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm


Return to Closed C&A Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users