Moderator: Community Team

Whoah whoah whoah. The bible mentions Unicorns after the flood? Does this mean Shel Silverstein isn't Noah? Either way it sounds to me like God (whoever he/they maybe) created Unicorns because the Bible/Irish Rovers song says so right? I like that, it all seems to fit well, sucks for Silverstein admittedly as he has been significantly downgraded from Ark Captain to Chief Author of Inspiring Irish Folk Ditties but I feel like he was just muscling in on the action anyway so maybe he deserves it.tzor wrote:Obviously (if you believe in a literal interpertation of the Bible) Noah put the unicorns in the ark because they continued to exist long after the flood. Mind you medieval explorers really weren't all that accurate in their descriptions and it is currently believed that they were describing rhinos in Africa. This evolved to the heraldic unicorn which of course never existed.
No people do. And these reports all postdate even the writing of Genesis by a significant amount. That's why you always see pictures of two girrafes in most Ark illustrations even though the bible doesn't mention them before, during or after the flood.Bertros Bertros wrote:Whoah whoah whoah. The bible mentions Unicorns after the flood?

So following that to its logical conculsion we can assume that all living creatures reported to exist after the writing of Genesis we're by definition in the Ark regardless of whether they are in the illustrations of the Ark or not (which leads to an interesting side query - who does Ark Illustrations, is it the same guys who draw pictures in court cause your not allowed to take photos of guilty people? They kind of have the same soft focus style about them, but I digress). So this means not only did God create unicorns but also the flying spaghetti monster. Bearing all that in mind its kind of a shame that teapots are inanimate, unless of course you like tea, in which case an orbitting teapot would be a ditinct disavantage whether you are a milk first person or not.tzor wrote:No people do. And these reports all postdate even the writing of Genesis by a significant amount.
Man... someday I'm gonna get that Big-Foot good.Bertros Bertros wrote:So following that to its logical conculsion we can assume that all living creatures reported to exist after the writing of Genesis we're by definition in the Ark regardless of whether they are in the illustrations of the Ark or not
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
AAFitz wrote:There will always be cheaters, abusive players, terrible players, and worse. But we have every right to crush them.
End the Flame Wars.MeDeFe wrote:This is a forum on the internet, what do you expect?
Now you're just being corny.nmhunate wrote:Well, you all are wrong. In fact there are no unicorns, but at the time of the flood they were alicorns, flying unicorns. Since Noah didn't have to carry flying creatures on the arc, unicorns lived. However, shortly after the flood, the majority of the alicorns lost their wings and became unicorns and were hunted to extinction for their valuable horn.

Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Nate, you are feeding a trool because it's impossible to be that stupid.MR. Nate wrote:with the understanding that it's quite possible I'm feeding a troll, I will point out that there is no biblical evidence for unicorns. If they existed at the time of the flood they were on the ark, but I have yet to see any evidence for the existance of unicorns.
Oh, yes...they exist! Meet Lancelot the Unicorn!MR. Nate wrote:with the understanding that it's quite possible I'm feeding a troll, I will point out that there is no biblical evidence for unicorns. If they existed at the time of the flood they were on the ark, but I have yet to see any evidence for the existance of unicorns.


Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

So how big was this ark and how long did it take to build.....was Noah an engineer ?Gregrios wrote:Nate, you are feeding a trool because it's impossible to be that stupid.MR. Nate wrote:with the understanding that it's quite possible I'm feeding a troll, I will point out that there is no biblical evidence for unicorns. If they existed at the time of the flood they were on the ark, but I have yet to see any evidence for the existance of unicorns.
All he's doing is patrinizing God and the Bible. Don't buy into it.
Your video clip fails because they couldn't hold the camera still if their lives depended on it.2dimes wrote:Go jump in a pool in maui DaGip, I fast posted the unicorn and mine's a video clip.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.