This is worth repeating.Ruben Cassar wrote:Is a small version of the maps available by any chance?
On a small map the army shadows are more cluttered and that might be a factor worth considering as well when deciding what are the right army shadow.
Moderator: Cartographers
This is worth repeating.Ruben Cassar wrote:Is a small version of the maps available by any chance?
On a small map the army shadows are more cluttered and that might be a factor worth considering as well when deciding what are the right army shadow.
In the last couple of days you have really come across as an arrogant arse, you certainly are not doing much for the reputation of the foundry. Lack can you please comment on the possibility of also retaining the old map, it would seemingly cut a lot of opposition at a stroke.yeti_c wrote:I find it Ironic that White 60 (new classic) is beating Black 60 (old classic)...
Therefore any and all posts I made about the people who hated the new map being in the minority - were all fully justified... I will accept apologies now.
C.
he is pretty right, white beats black (no i'm not a racist, lol i just ment the votes for the army circles), and since black 60% is the old version (AFAIK) and white 60% is the new versionwicked wrote:yeti_c wrote:I find it Ironic that White 60 (new classic) is beating Black 60 (old classic)...
Therefore any and all posts I made about the people who hated the new map being in the minority - were all fully justified... I will accept apologies now.
C.you could only infer that if those were the only two choices.
The irony of course is that I don't make Maps... I just write XML for Mapmakers.joecoolfrog wrote:In the last couple of days you have really come across as an arrogant arse, you certainly are not doing much for the reputation of the foundry. Lack can you please comment on the possibility of also retaining the old map, it would seemingly cut a lot of opposition at a stroke.yeti_c wrote:I find it Ironic that White 60 (new classic) is beating Black 60 (old classic)...
Therefore any and all posts I made about the people who hated the new map being in the minority - were all fully justified... I will accept apologies now.
C.

yes, what was it before?Etoh wrote:That's a good point: why is there not the option to keep the map the way it was?
yeti_c wrote:The irony of course is that I don't make Maps... I just write XML for Mapmakers.joecoolfrog wrote:In the last couple of days you have really come across as an arrogant arse, you certainly are not doing much for the reputation of the foundry. Lack can you please comment on the possibility of also retaining the old map, it would seemingly cut a lot of opposition at a stroke.yeti_c wrote:I find it Ironic that White 60 (new classic) is beating Black 60 (old classic)...
Therefore any and all posts I made about the people who hated the new map being in the minority - were all fully justified... I will accept apologies now.
C.
C.
It's called Classic because it copies the classic game board. We can do what we want with the graphic.sarascara wrote:It's called Classic for a reason. Keep it the way it was.
So are you telling me that now you can't even remember what your beloved classic map used to look like?jiminski wrote: But 'No shadows' (surely that is the original map?) is beating the combined 50% + 60% White vote (i think the first Re-touch ended with 55.5% or something close so i added them together.)
