fat peple pay more on publc trnsport? SWEET SUGAR DUMPLINGS!

greenoaks · Post by **greenoaks** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 7:45 am

MeDeFe wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
radiojake wrote:
brooksieb wrote:also i think fat people should not have children..... what about the spread of fat diseases
I also think that you should not be able to have children so you can't pass on your 'fucking stupid' disease - as such...

people in glass houses....
Does this even make any sense? I mean, you know, brooksie uses internet shorthand and so forth, but at least his prose retains grammatical integrity and a degree of syntax in it's structure, but his particular grammatical oddity almost reminds me of miss teen South Carolina.
To me it looks perfectly correct, it's not something one would write an a scientific essay, but I don't see anything grammatically fundamentally wrong with radiojake's statement. Surely you're well-read enough to know that saying about glass houses and stones and recognize the first half of it.

i get it, radiojake has a problem with humour.

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 7:52 am

MeDeFe wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
radiojake wrote:
brooksieb wrote:also i think fat people should not have children..... what about the spread of fat diseases
I also think that you should not be able to have children so you can't pass on your 'fucking stupid' disease - as such...

people in glass houses....
Does this even make any sense? I mean, you know, brooksie uses internet shorthand and so forth, but at least his prose retains grammatical integrity and a degree of syntax in it's structure, but his particular grammatical oddity almost reminds me of miss teen South Carolina.
To me it looks perfectly correct, it's not something one would write an a scientific essay, but I don't see anything grammatically fundamentally wrong with radiojake's statement. Surely you're well-read enough to know that saying about glass houses and stones and recognize the first half of it.

It's the "as such" that got me, really.

Pedronicus · Post by **Pedronicus** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:03 am

greenoaks wrote:fat people should all live on the moon where they won't notice they're fat.

When did America change its name to the moon?

JOHNNYROCKET24 · Post by **JOHNNYROCKET24** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:09 am

Pedronicus wrote:
greenoaks wrote:fat people should all live on the moon where they won't notice they're fat.
When did America change its name to the moon?

good thing the sun never sets on the british empire

Nickbaldwin · Post by **Nickbaldwin** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:16 am

And JR once again misses out on the making sense award.

william18 · Post by **william18** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 9:43 am

Oh no it's sunday.

brooksieb · Post by **brooksieb** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 5:02 pm

william18 wrote:Oh no it's sunday.

yup it makes no difference to me i have five days work five days off work 12 hour shifts so i don't care about sundays

william18 · Post by **william18** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:15 pm

brooksieb wrote:
william18 wrote:Oh no it's sunday.
yup it makes no difference to me i have five days work five days off work 12 hour shifts so i don't care about sundays

look a Nickbaldwins avatar.

comic boy · Post by **comic boy** » Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:33 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:
radiojake wrote:
brooksieb wrote:also i think fat people should not have children..... what about the spread of fat diseases
I also think that you should not be able to have children so you can't pass on your 'fucking stupid' disease - as such...

people in glass houses....
Does this even make any sense? I mean, you know, brooksie uses internet shorthand and so forth, but at least his prose retains grammatical integrity and a degree of syntax in it's structure, but his particular grammatical oddity almost reminds me of miss teen South Carolina.

Sadly it's not internet shorthand

radiojake · Post by **radiojake** » Mon Mar 10, 2008 5:46 am

greenoaks wrote: i get it, radiojake has a problem with humour.

Only the UnIntelleegent kind that seems to manifest in massive amounts amoungest the population of the CC boards.

Otherwise, I think I have a good sense of humour. Despite the rumours of my hate-mongering, grudge-bearing self, I actaually tend to laugh a lot around the home.

Especially when I'm high.

greenoaks · Post by **greenoaks** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:50 am

brooksieb wrote:i just thought i'd say it..... sorry for my fat brothers and sisters out there....

EHH FATTY BOOM BOOM!!........SWEET SUGAR DUMPLINGS!!!!!!.....

I VOTE YES YES AND YES FAT PEOPLE ARE KILLING DA WORLD!

and killing people by squishing them

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/boy-cr ... 36890.html

bellaraphon · Post by **bellaraphon** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:09 am

just cos this is about fat people:

In the united states US$56 billion is spent on weight loss products. Don't you think 56 billion dollars could be spent on something more worthwhile, like helping reduce poverty, ie. helping people put on fat instead of taking it off.

Nickbaldwin · Post by **Nickbaldwin** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:33 am

Fat fucks.

brooksieb · Post by **brooksieb** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:37 pm

bellaraphon wrote:just cos this is about fat people:

In the united states US$56 billion is spent on weight loss products. Don't you think 56 billion dollars could be spent on something more worthwhile, like helping reduce poverty, ie. helping people put on fat instead of taking it off.

Over here surgery is free, so if ur fat you get a easyway out. And did you know more people are fat then they are thin in the world.

Snorri1234 · Post by **Snorri1234** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:38 pm

brooksieb wrote:
bellaraphon wrote:just cos this is about fat people:

In the united states US$56 billion is spent on weight loss products. Don't you think 56 billion dollars could be spent on something more worthwhile, like helping reduce poverty, ie. helping people put on fat instead of taking it off.
Over here surgery is free, so if ur fat you get a easyway out. And did you know more people are fat then they are thin in the world.

Liposuction is free?

brooksieb · Post by **brooksieb** » Sun Mar 23, 2008 12:58 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:
brooksieb wrote:
bellaraphon wrote:just cos this is about fat people:

In the united states US$56 billion is spent on weight loss products. Don't you think 56 billion dollars could be spent on something more worthwhile, like helping reduce poverty, ie. helping people put on fat instead of taking it off.
Over here surgery is free, so if ur fat you get a easyway out. And did you know more people are fat then they are thin in the world.
Liposuction is free?

Yeah if they think you're in need of it, it is free.

fat peple pay more on publc trnsport? SWEET SUGAR DUMPLINGS!

should they

Re: fat peple pay more on publc trnsport? SWEET SUGAR DUMPLI